Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 803–817 | Cite as

The use of hatchery technology for the conservation of Pacific and Atlantic salmon

  • Desmond J. Maynard
  • Joan G. Trial


Hatchery technology has been employed for the conservation of Pacific (Oncorhynchus spp.) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) for over 140 years. The initial societal paradigm was that nature is inefficient and hatcheries could be used to conserve stocks that were over utilized or suffering habitat degradation. Although these early hatcheries failed to meet their conservation objectives, they succeeded in developing the spawning-to-swimup fry culture technology used today. In the 1930s the paradigm shifted to artificial and natural production being equally effective and led to the closure of Federal hatcheries in areas with intact freshwater habitat. Hatcheries were maintained to mitigate for habitat loss from hydropower development. With the development of cost effective smolt production technology by 1960, the paradigm returned to nature being inefficient and ushered in the massive conservation utilization production of Pacific salmon that continues to this day. The early 1990s saw another paradigm shift with nature’s inefficiency recognized as being the foundation for evolution to maintain the fitness of salmon in their natural environment. This shift gave rise to a focus for hatchery technology to preserve stocks in their native habitats. Using hatcheries for preservation–conservation has become the norm for Atlantic salmon in the USA and Atlantic Canada and for Pacific salmon stocks listed under the Endangered Species Act in the USA or as species at risk in Canada.


Salmon Oncorhynchus Salmo salar Conservation Hatchery 


  1. Allendorf FW, Waples RS (1996) Conservation and genetics of salmonid fishes. In: Harick JL, Avise JC (eds) Conservation genetics: case histories from nature. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 238–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argue AW, Hilborn R, Peterman RM, Staley JM, Walters CJ (1983) Strait of Georgia Chinook and coho fishery. Can Bull Fish Aquat Sci No 211. Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum ET (1997) Maine Atlantic salmon: a national treasure. Atlantic Salmon Unlimited, HermonGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg II (1968) History of Washington State Department of Fisheries, 1890–1967. State of Washington Department of Fisheries, OlympiaGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowlby HD, Gibson AJF (2011) Reduction in fitness limits the useful duration of supplementary rearing in an endangered salmon population. Ecol Appl 21:3032–3048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brannon EL, Currens KP, Goodman D, Lichatowich JA, McConnaha WE, Riddell BE, Williams RN (1999) Review of artificial production of anadromous and resident fish in the Columbia river basin, Part I: a scientific basis for Columbia river production programs. Northwest Power Planning Council, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  7. Busack CA, Currens KP (1995) Genetic risks and hazards in hatchery operations: fundamental concepts and issues. In: Schramm HL Jr, Piper RG (eds) Uses and effects of cultured fishes in aquatic ecosystems: symposium 15. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 71–80Google Scholar
  8. Campton DE (1995) Genetic effects of hatchery fish on wild populations of Pacific salmon and steelhead: what do we really know? In: Schramm HL Jr, Piper RG (eds) Uses and effects of cultured fishes in aquatic ecosystems: symposium 15. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 337–353Google Scholar
  9. Campton DE (1998) Genetic effects of hatcheries on wild populations of Pacific salmon and steelhead: overview of fact and speculation. In: Kinsel W, Brannon E (eds) Proceeding of Columbia river anadromous rehabilitation and passage symposium. University of Idaho Aquaculture Research Institute, Moscow, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  10. Carr JW, Whoriskey F, O’Reilly P (2004) Efficacy of releasing captive reared broodstock into an imperiled wild Atlantic salmon population as a recovery strategy. J Fish Biol 65:38–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CBFWA (1990) Review of the history, development, and management of anadromous fish production facilities in the Columbia river basin. Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  12. Chaput G (2012) Overview of the status of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in the North Atlantic and trends in marine mortality. ICES J Mar Sci 69(9):1538–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark GH (1929) Sacramento-San Joaquin salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) fishery of California. Fish Bull No 17. California Division of Fish and Game, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  14. Cobb JN (1930) Pacific salmon fisheries Doc No 1092 Bureau of Fisheries. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Colligan MA, Kocik JF, Kimball DC, Marancik G, McKeon JF, Nickerson PR (1999) Status review of anadromous Atlantic salmon in the United States. National Marine Fisheries Service/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Joint Publication, Gloucester, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook R, MacDonald J, Irvine JR (2008) Canadian enhanced salmonid production during 1978–2007 (1977–2006 brood years). NPAFC Doc. No. 1109Google Scholar
  17. Davis B, Allee B, Amend D, Bachen B, Davidson B, Gharrett T, Marshall S, Wertheimer A (1985) FRED special report Alaska. Department of Fish and Game, JuneauGoogle Scholar
  18. de Mestral LG, O’Reilly PT, Jones R, Flanagan J, Herbinger CM (2013) Preliminary assessment of the environmental and selective effects of a captive breeding and rearing programme for endangered Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Fish Manag Ecol 20:75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Department of Fisheries and Oceans web based Commercial Fisheries Landings (2012). Accessed 7 Feb 2012
  20. Dodson JJ, Gibson RJ, Cunjak RA, Friedland KD, de Leaniz CG, Gross MR, Roy S (1998) Elements in the development of conservation plans for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55(S1):312–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunfield RW (1985) The Atlantic salmon in the history of North America. Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 80Google Scholar
  22. Elson PF (1957) The role of hatcheries in assuring maritime stocks of Atlantic salmon. Can Fish Cult 21:25–32Google Scholar
  23. Elson PF (1959) Developing effective use of hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Canada. ICES J Mar Sci 148:69–71Google Scholar
  24. ENRI (2001) Evaluating Alaska’s ocean-ranching salmon hatcheries: biologic and management issues. University of Alaska Environment and Natural Resources Institute, AnchorageGoogle Scholar
  25. Fay CA, Bartron M, Craig S, Hecht A, Pruden J, Saunders R, Sheehan T, and Trial J (2006) Status review for anadromous Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in the United States. National Marine Fisheries Service/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Joint Publication, Gloucester, Massachusetts, p 294. Accessed 20 Feb 2013
  26. Flagg TA, Nash CE (1999) A conceptual framework for conservation hatchery strategies for Pacific salmonids. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-38Google Scholar
  27. Flagg TA, Waknitz FW, Maynard DJ, Milner GB, Mahnken CVW (1995) The effect of hatcheries on native coho salmon populations in the lower Columbia river. In: Schramm HL Jr, Piper RG (eds) Uses and effects of cultured fishes in aquatic ecosystems: symposium 15. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 366–375Google Scholar
  28. Flagg TA, Berejikian BA, Colt JE, Dickhoff WW, Harrell LW, Maynard DJ, Nash CE, Strom MS, Iwamoto RN, Mahnken CVW (2000a) Ecological and behavioral impacts of artificial production strategies on the abundance of wild salmon populations. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-41Google Scholar
  29. Flagg TA, Maynard DJ, Mahnken CVW (2000b) Conservation hatcheries. In: Stickney RR (ed) Encyclopedia of aquaculture. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 174–177Google Scholar
  30. Flagg TA, Mahnken CVW, Iwamoto RN (2004) Conservation hatchery protocols for Pacific salmon. In: Nickum MJ, Mazik PM, Nickum JG, MacKinlay DD (eds) Propagated fish in resource management symposium 44. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 603–619Google Scholar
  31. Forester RE (1936) Sockeye salmon propagation in British Columbia. Biol Board Canada Bull No 53Google Scholar
  32. Gibson AJF, Jones RA, Bowlby HD (2009) Equilibrium analyses of a population’s response to recovery activities: a case study with Atlantic salmon. N Am J Fish Manag 29:958–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hard J (2002) Genetic risks of hatchery salmon production to wild salmon. In: Orr C, Gallugher P, Penikett J (eds) Hatcheries and the protection of wild salmon. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, pp 72–85Google Scholar
  34. Hard JJ, Jones Jr RP, Delarm MR, Waples RS (1992) Pacific salmon and artificial propagation under the Endangered Species Act. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-2Google Scholar
  35. Harry J, Gale R, Hendee J (1969) Conservation: an upper-middle class social movement. J Leis Res 1:246–254Google Scholar
  36. Heard WR (1998) Do hatchery salmon affect the North Pacific Ocean ecosystem. NPAFC Bull 1:405–408Google Scholar
  37. Hindar K, Ryman N, Utter F (1991) Genetic effects of cultured fish on natural fish populations. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:945–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kocik JF, Brown RW (2002) From game fish to tame fish Atlantic salmon in North America, 1798 to 1998. In: Jones ML, Taylor WW, Lynch KD (eds) Sustaining North American salmon: perspectives across regions and discipline. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 3–31Google Scholar
  39. Leitritz E (1961) A history of California’s fish hatcheries 1870–1960. Fish Bull No 150. California Department of Fish and Game, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  40. Leitritz E, Lewis RC (1980) Trout and salmon culture (hatchery methods). Fish Bull No 164. California Department of Fish and Game, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  41. Lichatowich J (1999) Salmon without rivers: a history of the Pacific salmon crisis. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  42. Marshall TL, Farmer GJ, Cutting RE (1994) Atlantic salmon initiatives in Scottia-Fundy Region, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. In: Proceedings of the New England Atlantic salmon management conference on a hard look at some tough issues, New England: Salmon Association, pp 116–123Google Scholar
  43. Maynard DJ, Flagg TA, McAuley WC, Frost DA, Kluver B, Wastel M, Colt J, Dickhoff WW (2012) Fish culture technology and practices for captive broodstock rearing of ESA-listed salmon stocks. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-117Google Scholar
  44. McClure MM, Carlson SM, Beechie TJ, Pess GR, Jorgensen JC, Sogard SM, Sultan SE, Holzer BM, Travis J, Sanderson BL, Power ME, Carmichael RW (2008) Evolutionary consequences of habitat loss for Pacific anadromous salmonids. Evol Appl 1:300–318PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCrimmon H (1965) The beginnings of salmon culture in Canada. Can Geogr J 1965:3–11Google Scholar
  46. McDonald J (1981) The stock concept and its application of British Columbia fisheries. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:1657–1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Meister AL (1984) The marine migrations of tagged Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) of USA origin. ICES Doc CM 27Google Scholar
  48. Miller AS, Sheehan TF, Renkawitz MD, Meister AL, Miller TJ (2012) Revisiting the marine migration of US Atlantic salmon using historical Carlin tag data. ICES J Mar Sci 69:1609–1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mobrand L, Barr J, Blankenship L, Campton D, Eveyln T, Flagg T, Mahnken C (2005) Hatchery reform in Washington State: principles and emerging issues. Fisheries 3(6):11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moring JR (1986) Stocking anadromous species to restore or enhance fisheries. In: Stroud RH (ed) Fish culture in fisheries management: proceedings of a symposium on the role of fish culture in fisheries management. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 59–74Google Scholar
  51. Moring JR (2000) The creation of the first public salmon hatchery in the United States. Fisheries 25:6–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moring JR, Marancik J, Griffiths F (1995) Changes in stocking strategies for Atlantic salmon restoration and rehabilitation in Maine, 1871–1993. Am Fish Soc Symp 15:38–46Google Scholar
  53. Naish KA, Taylor JE III, Levin PS, Quinn TP, Winton J, Huppert D, Hilborn R (2008) An evaluation of the effects of conservation and fishery enhancement hatcheries on wild populations of salmon. Adv Mar Biol 53:61–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nehlsen W, Williams JE, Lichatowich JA (1991) Pacific salmon at the crossroads: stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries 16:4–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Noakes DJ, Beamish RJ, Sweeting R, King J (2000) Changing the balance: interactions between hatchery and wild Pacific coho salmon in the presence of regime shifts. NPAFC Bull 2:155–163Google Scholar
  56. O’Connell MF, Dempson JB, Mullins CC, Reddin DG, Bourgeois CE, Porter TR, Cochrance NM, Caines D (2003) Status of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) stocks of insular Newfoundland (SFAs 3-14A). Res Doc 2003/105. Accessed 7 Feb 2013
  57. O’Reilly P, Doyle R (2007) Live gene banking of endangered populations of Atlantic salmon. In: Verspoor E, Stradmeyer L, Nielsen JL (eds) The Atlantic salmon: genetics, conservation and management. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 425–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Paquet PJ, Flagg T, Appleby A, Barr J, Blankenship L, Campton D, Delarm M, Evelyn T, Fast D, Gislason J, Kline P, Maynard D, Mobrand L, Nandor G, Seidel P, Smith S (2011) Hatcheries, conservation, and sustainable fisheries—achieving multiple goals: results of the Hatchery Scientific Review Group’s Columbia river basin review. Fisheries 36:547–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Peek JM (1986) A review of wildlife management. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  60. Pennell W, Barton BA (1996) Principles of salmonid culture. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  61. Peterman RM, Holt CA, Rutherford MR (2012) The need for international cooperation to reduce competition among salmon for a common pool of prey resources in the North Pacific Ocean. NPAFC Tech Rep 8:99–101Google Scholar
  62. Piper RG, McElwain IB, Orme LE, McCraren JP, Fowler LG, Leonard LR (1982) Fish hatchery management. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  63. Power G (1973) Salmon management-myths and magic. In: proceedings of the international symposium on the Atlantic salmon: management, biology and survival of the species, International Atlantic Salmon Foundation, Spec Pub 4:20–22Google Scholar
  64. Rich WH (1920) Early history and seaward migration of Chinook salmon in the Columbia and Sacramento Rivers. US Bur Fish Bull 37:1–73Google Scholar
  65. Rich WH (1922) A statistical analysis of the results of the artificial propagation of Chinook salmon. Unpublished Manuscript, Manuscript Library, Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  66. Ritter JA (1997) The contribution of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) enhancement to a sustainable resource. ICES J Mar Sci 54:1177–1187Google Scholar
  67. Roppel P (1982) Alaska salmon hatcheries, 1891–1959. National Marine Fisheries Service, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  68. Ruggerone GT, Zimmermann M, Myers KW, Nielsen JL, Rogers DE (2003) Competition between Asian pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and Alaskan sockeye salmon (O. nerka) in the North Pacific Ocean. Fish Oceanogr 12:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schalk RF (1986) Estimating salmon and steelhead usage in the Columbia Basin before 1850: the anthropological perspective. Northwest Environ J 2:22–23Google Scholar
  70. Taylor JE (1999) Making salmon an environmental history of the Northwest fisheries crisis. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  71. United States Atlantic Salmon Assessment Committee (USASAC) (2012) Annual Report of the U.S. Atlantic Salmon Assessment Committee. Report No 24—2011 Activities. Accessed 12 Feb 2013
  72. Vreeland RR (1989) Evaluation of the contribution of fall Chinook salmon reared at Columbia river hatcheries to the Pacific salmon fisheries. Report No. DOE/BP-39638-4, Bonneville Power Administration, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  73. Wahle RJ, Vreeland RR (1978) Bioeconomic contribution to Columbia River hatchery fall Chinook salmon, 1961 and 1964 broods, to the Pacific salmon fisheries. Fish Bull 76:179–208Google Scholar
  74. Wahle RJ, Vreeland RR, Lander RH (1974) Bioeconomic contribution of Columbia River hatchery coho salmon, 1965 and 1966 broods, to the Pacific salmon fisheries. Fish Bull 72:139–169Google Scholar
  75. Waples RS (1991) Genetic interactions between hatchery and wild salmonids: lessons from the Pacific Northwest. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:124–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Waples RS (1995) Genetic effects of stock transfers of fish. In: Philipp D (ed) Protection of aquatic biodiversity: proceeding of the World Fisheries Congress, Theme 3. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, pp 51–69Google Scholar
  77. Wedemeyer GA (2001) Fish hatchery management. American Fisheries Society, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  78. White HCA (1924) A quantitative determination of the number of survivors from the planting 5,000 trout fry in each of two streams. Contrib Can Biol Fish 2:135–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wood EM (1953) A century of American fish culture, 1853–1953. Prog Fish Cult 15:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wood A (2002) The history, goals and direction of the Salmonid Enhancement Program (SEP) in British Columbia. In: Orr C, Gallugher P, Penikett J (eds) Hatcheries and the protection of wild salmon. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, pp 5–9Google Scholar
  81. Wright S (1981) Contemporary Pacific salmon fisheries management. N Am J Fish Manag 1:29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Resource Utilization and Technology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries ServiceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationManchesterUSA
  2. 2.Division of Sea-run Fisheries and HabitatMaine Department of Marine ResourcesBangorUSA

Personalised recommendations