International Review of Education

, Volume 64, Issue 1, pp 65–84 | Cite as

Widening higher education participation in rural communities in England: An anchor institution model

Original Paper

Abstract

Against a United Kingdom policy background of attempts to widen higher education participation in a socially inclusive direction, this article analyses theory, policy and practice to understand why past efforts have had limited success and to propose an alternative: an “anchor institution” model. A university and a private training provider were the principal partners in this venture, known as the South-West Partnership (pseudonym); the model was developed by them to meet the particular needs of mature female students who want and/or need to study part-time in a rural, coastal and isolated area of south-west England. While the concept of “anchor institutions” has previously been used in government social policy, and in higher education to promote knowledge transfer, it has not yet been adopted as a method for widening participation. The research study presented in this article investigated the effectiveness of the model in widening higher education participation in the context of the South-West Partnership. The study was conducted within an interpretivist theoretical framework. It accessed student voices to illustrate the character of education required to widen participation in vocational higher education by mature female students in rural communities, through semi-structured qualitative interviews on a range of topics identified from relevant theoretical literature, and by drawing on the research team’s professional knowledge and experience. These topics included student aspirations and career destinations, motivations, access, learning experiences, and peer and tutor support. It is hoped the findings will inform the future development of adult vocational higher education provision in rural areas, where opportunities have been limited, and encourage further application of the anchor institution model for widening participation elsewhere.

Keywords

higher education widening participation lifelong learning access rural anchor institutions 

Résumé

Élargir la participation des communautés rurales anglaises à l’enseignement supérieur : le modèle d’institution d’ancrage – Sur fond d’une politique menée par le Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord visant à élargir la participation à l’enseignement supérieur dans un esprit d’inclusion sociale, cet article en analyse la théorie, les politiques et les pratiques afférentes, dans le but de cerner les raisons pour lesquelles les efforts déployés ont rencontré un succès limité, et de proposer une alternative : un modèle « d’institution d’ancrage ». Une université et un organisme privé de formation étaient les principaux partenaires de cette initiative connue sous le nom de Partenariat Sud-Ouest (pseudonyme). Ils ont élaboré ce modèle pour répondre aux besoins spécifiques de femmes adultes souhaitant et/ou devant suivre des études à temps partiel dans une région rurale, côtière ou isolée du Sud-Ouest de l’Angleterre. Si le concept « d’institution d’ancrage » a été auparavant utilisé dans des politiques sociales publiques ainsi que dans l’enseignement supérieur en vue de promouvoir le transfert des connaissances, il n’a pas encore été adopté en tant que méthode censée élargir la participation. L’étude de recherche présentée ici examine l’efficacité du modèle à élargir la participation à l’enseignement supérieur dans le contexte du Partenariat Sud-Ouest. Elle a été menée dans un cadre d’interprétation théorique. Elle fait entendre les opinions des étudiantes en vue d’illustrer le caractère requis de la formation pour élargir la participation à l’enseignement professionnel supérieur des femmes adultes dans les communautés rurales – ce à travers des interviews qualitatives semi-structurées sur une série de thèmes tirés de la littérature théorique afférente, ainsi que les connaissances et expériences professionnelles de l’équipe de recherche. Parmi ces thèmes figurent les aspirations, intentions et motivations des étudiantes, leur accès à la formation, leurs expériences d’apprentissage, enfin le soutien de la part des pairs et des tuteurs. L’auteur espère que les résultats de cette étude éclaireront le développement futur de l’enseignement professionnel supérieur des adultes dans les régions rurales caractérisées par des opportunités limitées, et encourageront l’extension du modèle de l’institution d’ancrage dans l’optique d’élargir la participation en d’autres lieux.

References

  1. Allan, E., Iverson, S., & Ropers-Huilman, R. (Eds.). (2009). Reconstructing policy in higher education: Feminist poststructural perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, T. (2016). Universities as anchor institutions [online blogpost]. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). Retrieved 6 October 2016 from http://blog.hefce.ac.uk/2015/03/16/universities-as-anchor-institutions/.
  3. AITF (Anchor Institutions Task Force) (2016). Anchor Institutions Task Force Literature review. New York, NY: AITF Marga [online resource]. Retrieved 3 February 2016 from https://www.margain.com/initiatives/aitf
  4. Armstrong, D., & Cairnduff, A. (2012). Inclusion in higher education: Issues in university-school partnership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(9), 917–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avis, J., & Orr, K. (2016). HE in FE: Vocationalism, class and social justice. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 21(1–2), 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BIS (Department for Business Innovation and Skills) (2011). Higher education: Students at the heart of the system. Cm 8122. Norwich: The Stationery Office (TSO). Retrieved 24 October 2017 from http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/pdfs/2011-white-paper-higher-ed.pdf.
  7. BIS (2013). The benefits of higher education participation for individuals and society. BIS Research Paper No. 146. London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills. Retrieved 24 October 2017 from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/254101/bis-13-1268-benefits-of-higher-education-participation-the-quadrants.pdf.
  8. BIS (2015a). On target for a higher skilled workforce. Press release [online]. Retrieved 17 October 2016 from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/on-target-for-a-higher-skilled-workforce.
  9. BIS (2015b). Participation rates in higher education: Academic years 2006/2007–2013/2014 (provisional) [online resource]. Retrieved 16 October 2016 from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/458034/HEIPR_PUBLICATION_2013-14.pdf.
  10. BIS (2016a). Success as a knowledge economy: Teaching excellence, social mobility & student choice. White paper. Cm 9258. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Retrieved 24 October 2016 from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/higher-education-success-as-a-knowledge-economy-white-paper.
  11. BIS (2016b). Higher education and research Bill [online resource]. Retrieved 16 October 2016 from http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2016-17/highereducationandresearch.html.
  12. Bottery, M. (2001). Globalisation and the UK competition state: No room for transformational leadership in education? School Leadership and Management, 21(2), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (2001). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  15. Bourdieu, P. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Brooks, R. (2012). Student-parents and higher education: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Education Policy, 27(3), 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Busher, H., James, N., & Piela, A. (2015). “I always wanted to do second chance learning”: Identities and experiences of tutors on Access to Higher Education courses. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 20(2), 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cabinet Office (2017). Policy area: Community and society [online resource]. Retrieved 11 May 2017 from https://www.gov.uk/government/topics/community-and-society.
  19. CoE (Council of Europe) (2017). Higher education and research statement [Online]. Retrieved 16 May 2017 from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/highereducation/CompletedActivities/Access_EN.asp.
  20. Craft, A. (2010). The assessment of quality risks in collaborative provision. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(1), 25–29.Google Scholar
  21. Crozier, G., & Reay, D. (2011). Capital accumulation: Working class students learning how to learn in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(2), 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2015). Promoting university students’ metacognitive regulation through peer learning: The potential of reciprocal peer tutoring. Higher Education, 70(3), 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DfE (Department for Education) (2016). Postgraduate loans [online resource]. Retrieved 16 October 2016 from https://www.gov.uk/postgraduate-loan/overview.
  24. DfES (Department for Education and Skills) (2003). The future of higher education. Cm 5735. Norwich: The Stationery Office (TSO). Retrieved 24 October 2017 from http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/pdfs/2003-white-paper-higher-ed.pdf.
  25. Dhillon, J. (2005). The rhetoric and reality of partnership working. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 29(3), 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elliott, G. (2016). Challenging assumptions about values, interests and power in further and higher education partnerships. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(2), 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fleming, M., & Grace, D. (2014). Increasing participation of rural and regional students in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(5), 483–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foskett, N. (2002). Marketing imperative or cultural challenge: Embedding widening participation in the further education sector. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 7(1), 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gale, T. (2015). Widening and expanding participation in Australian higher education: In the absence of sociological imagination. The Australian Educational Researcher, 42(2), 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gibney, E. (2013). Concentration of UK universities v population distribution. Times Higher Education, 8 August [online article]. Retrieved 16 October 2016 from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/concentration-of-uk-universities-v-population-distribution/2006284.article.
  31. Gorard, S., & Selwyn, N. (1999). Switching on the learning society? – Questioning the role of technology in widening participation in lifelong learning. Journal of Education Policy, 14(5), 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gov UK (Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) (2011). Building the big society. Conservative–Liberal Democrat Government statement [online resource]. Retrieved 17 October 2016 from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/78979/building-big-society_0.pdf.
  33. Gray, F. (2002). Landscapes of learning: Lifelong learning in rural communities. National Institute of Adult and Continuing Education (NIACE): Leicester.Google Scholar
  34. Harrison, N., Waller, R., & Last, K. (2015). The evaluation of widening participation activities in higher education: A survey of institutional leaders in England. Assessing Impact and Measuring Success (AIMS) project Working Paper 1: June 2015 Bristol: University of the West of England (UWE). Retrieved 12 May 2017 from http://www2.uwe.ac.uk/faculties/CAHE/Documents/Research/BRILLE/Report%201%20-%20Institutional%20Survey%20-%20June%202015.pdf.
  35. HEA (Higher Education Academy) (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change. Final report from the What Works? Student Retention and Success programme. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation. Retrieved 2 November 2016 from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/what_works_final_report.pdf.
  36. HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England) (2013). Trends in young participation in higher Education. Bristol: HEFCE. Retrieved 24 October 2017 from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2013/201328/HEFCE_2013_28.pdf.
  37. HEFCE (2014). Higher education in England 2014: Analysis of latest shifts and trends. Bristol: HEFCE. Retrieved 11 May 2017 from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/analysis/HEinEngland/HEENG/heeng14/.
  38. HEFCE (2015). Student mobility [online resource]. Retrieved 6 October 2016 from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/analysis/maps/student/.
  39. HEFCE (2017). National student survey [online resource]. Retrieved 12 May 2017 from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/lt/nss/.
  40. HEFCE & OFFA (Higher Education Funding Council for England and the Office for Fair Access) (2014). National strategy for access and student success in higher education. BIS/14/516. London: London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Retrieved 24 October 2017 from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/299689/bis-14-516-national-strategy-for-access-and-student-success.pdf.
  41. Hillman, N. (Ed.) (2015). It’s the finance, stupid! The decline of part-time higher education and what to do about it. Oxford: (Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI). Retrieved 17 October 2016 from http://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/part-time_web.pdf.
  42. Hinton-Smith, T. (2016). Negotiating the risk of debt-financed higher education: The experience of lone parent students. British Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. HoC (House of Commons) (2009). Banking crisis: Dealing with the failure of the UK banks. HC 416. London: House of Commons: Treasury Committee Retrieved 16 October 2016 from https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmtreasy/416/416.pdf.
  44. Holford, J. (2016). The misuses of sustainability: Adult education, citizenship and the dead hand of neoliberalism. International Review of Education, 62(5), 541–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. IU (IntoUniversity) (2016). Rural aspiration: Access to higher education in rural, coastal and dispersed communities. London: IntoUniversity. Retrieved 5 October 2016 from http://intouniversity.org/sites/all/files/userfiles/files/IntoUniversity%20Rural%20Aspiration%20Report%202015.pdf.
  46. Kadi-Hanifi, K., & Elliott, G. (2016). Appraising and reconfiguring HE in FE through research and critical perspective. Editorial to a special issue on Higher Education in Further Education. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 21(1–2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  47. Lea, M., & Jones, S. (2011). Digital literacies in higher education: Exploring textual and technological practice. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Llamos, J., & Ramos-Sanchez, L. (2013). Role of peer support on intragroup marginalization for Latino undergraduates. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 41(3), 158–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McGivney, V. (1999). Returning women: Their training and employment choices and needs. National Institute of Adult and Continuing Education (NIACE): Leicester.Google Scholar
  50. McLellan, J., Pettigrew, R., & Sperlinger, T. (2016). Remaking the elite university: An experiment in widening participation in the UK. Power and Education, 8(1), 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marandet, E., & Wainwright, E. (2010). Invisible experiences: Understanding the choices and needs of university students with dependent children. British Educational Research Journal, 36(5), 787–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marx, K. (1981 [1894]). Capital: A critique of political economy. Vol. 3. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  53. Mojab, S. (2009). Turning work and lifelong learning inside out: A Marxist-feminist attempt. In L. Cooper & S. Walters (Eds.), Learning/work: Turning work and lifelong learning inside out (pp. 4–15). Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
  54. Murray, N., & Klinger, C. (2012). Dimensions of conflict: Reflections on the higher education experience from an access education perspective. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 31(2), 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2017). Enhancing higher education system performance: Why we are doing this work now [webpage]. Retrieved 14 May 2017 from http://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/enhancing-higher-education-system-performance-why-we-are-doing-this-work-now.htm.
  56. Orr, D., & Hovdhaugen, E. (2014). “Second chance” routes into higher education: Sweden, Norway and Germany compared. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 33(1), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Osborne, M., Marks, A., & Turner, E. (2004). Becoming a mature student: How adult applicants weigh the advantages and disadvantages of higher education. Higher Education, 48(3), 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Oxford Economics (2014). Macroeconomic influences on the demand for part-time higher education in the UK. Report to HEFCE. Oxford: Oxford Economics. Retrieved 20 October 2014 from www.oxfordeconomics.com/publication/open/249712.
  59. Parry, G., Callender, C., Scott, P., & Temple, P. (2012). Understanding higher education in further education colleges. BIS Research Paper Number 69. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Retrieved 24 October 2017 from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/14785/1/12-905-understanding-higher-education-in-further-education-colleges.
  60. Scott, G. (2010). Delivering higher education within further education in England: Issues, tensions and opportunities. Management in Education, 24(3), 98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smallbone, D., Kitching, J., Blackburn, R., & Mosavi, S. (2015). Anchor institutions and small firms in the UK: A review of the literature on anchor institutions and their role in developing management and leadership skills in small firms. Wath-upon-Dearne: UK Commission for Employment and Skills (UKCES). Retrieved 6 October 2016 from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/414390/Anchor_institutions_and_small_firms.pdf.
  62. Tight, M. (2012). Widening participation: A post-war scorecard. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(3), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tummons, J., Fournier, C., Kits, O., & MacLeod, A. (2015). Teaching without a blackboard and chalk: Conflicting attitudes towards using ICTs in higher education teaching and learning. Higher education Research and Development, 35(4), 829–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. UCAS (Universities and Colleges Admissions Service). (2014). End of cycle report 2014. Cheltenham: UCAS.Google Scholar
  65. Webber, L. (2014). Accessing HE for non-traditional students: “Outside of my position”. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 19(1), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilkins, W., & Burke, P. (2015). Widening participation in higher education: The role of professional and social class identities and commitments. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(3), 434–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Willetts, D. (2014). Contribution of UK universities to national and local economic growth. Speech delivered by Universities and Science Minister David Willetts on 3 April to the Universities UK (UUK) conference. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Retrieved 17 October 2016 from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/contribution-of-uk-universities-to-national-and-local-economic-growth.
  68. Wilson, T. (2012). A review of business-university collaboration. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Retrieved 17 October 2016 from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/32383/12-610-wilson-review-business-university-collaboration.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature, and UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WorcesterWorcesterUK

Personalised recommendations