Autonomy, Liberalism, and Anti-Perfectionism
John Christman has recently objected to substantive conceptions of autonomy on the grounds that they introduce unwanted perfectionism into political thinking. I defend substantive conceptions of autonomy against Christman’s critique on two fronts. First, I defend substantive conceptions of autonomy against the charge that their utilisation in political theory would result in the inappropriate exclusion from democratic respect of individuals in oppressive relations. Second, I defend substantive conceptions of autonomy from the charge that they fail the ‘endorsement constraint’, i.e. that incorporating a substantive conception of autonomy into the concept of the person at the heart of a political theory would be alienating for citizens.
KeywordsAutonomy Liberalism Perfectionism Christman
I would like to thanktwo anonymous referees for this journal, as well as participants in the Workshop on Gender and Philosophy at MIT, and the Mentoring Project at UMass, for helpful feedback on earlier drafts.
- Bratman, Michael. 2000. Reflection, planning, and temporally extended agency. The Philosophical Review 109: 35–61.Google Scholar
- Christman, John. 1991. Autonomy and personal history. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21: 1–24.Google Scholar
- Kristinsson, Sigurdur. 2000. The limits of neutrality: Toward a weakly substantive account of autonomy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30: 257–286.Google Scholar
- Mackenzie, Catriona, and Natalie Stoljar. 2000. Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on automony, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Meyers, Diana Tietjens. 1989. Self, society, and personal choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
- Rawls, John. 2005. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Raz, Joseph. 1986. The morality of freedom. New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Stoljar, Natalie. 2000. Autonomy and the feminist intuition. In Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self, ed. Catriona Mackenzie, and Natalie Stoljar, 94–111. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wolf, Susan. 1993. Freedom within reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar