Notes
I do not know whether the problem is obsolete after the launch of CERN’s Large Hadron Collider in September 2008 (Page references to these books are in the text next to either ‘WCS’ or ‘N’).
Sunstein has an important chapter on future generations, which endorses a principle of Intergenerational Neutrality and explores its relation to discounting the future. There is no space to discuss this here.
Sunstein does not go into how much extra weight should be given to the worst off, but this is tricky and not really to the point of his discussion. Norman Daniels describes this, in the context of health, as an ‘unsolved rationing problem’ (Daniels 2008).
The authors do not say exactly what the default is for organ retrieval from the dead in the US, but their argument strongly implies that organs are not taken unless the dead people had consented. But this is not so. When people have not made their wishes known, the family are asked, and if they agree, retrieval may go ahead (Price 2000).
References
Crockett, R., T.M. Wilkinson, and T.M. Marteau. 2008. Social patterning of screening uptake and the impact of facilitating informed choice: Psychological and ethical analyses. Health Care Analysis 16: 17–30.
Norman, Daniels. 2008. Just health. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Price, David. 2000. Legal and ethical aspects of organ transplantation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Sagoff, Mark. 1988. The economy of the earth. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Schelling, Thomas. 1984. Choice and consequence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 2002. Rationality and freedom. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
The Economist. 2008. Bagehot, July 26: 63.
Wilkinson, T.M. 2003. Against Dworkin’s endorsement constraint. Utilitas 15: 175–193.
Wodehouse, P.G. 1981. Right ho Jeeves, reprinted in Life with Jeeves. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Acknowledgement
My thanks to an anonymous referee.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilkinson, T.M. Reason, Paternalism, and Disaster. Res Publica 15, 203–211 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-008-9078-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-008-9078-7