Advertisement

Innovative graphene microbial platforms for domestic wastewater treatment

  • Hanaa M. Hegab
  • Ahmed ElMekawy
  • Ben van den Akker
  • Milena Ginic-Markovic
  • Christopher Saint
  • Gayle Newcombe
  • Deepak Pant
review paper

Abstract

Supplying clean water to fulfill human requirements is one of this century’s priorities. Global water resources are barely aligned with the rising demand, which is further aggravated by rising population, climate change and water quality problems. Consequently, there is a persistent need for innovative technologies to valorize unconventional water resources such as domestic wastewater. Graphene holds promising prospects in developing domestic wastewater treatment to qualitatively enhance treatment efficiency and quantitatively increase water supply. This review highlights the existing wastewater treatment processes along with their challenges according to South Australian wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) which are representative of many modern WWTPs. The discussion will also cover the current and potential applications of graphene for domestic wastewater treatment, as well as obstacles and research priorities required for commercialization.

Keywords

Domestic wastewater Graphene Sludge Microbial platforms Wastewater treatment plant 

References

  1. Akamatsu K, Yoshida Y, Suzaki T et al (2012) Development of a membrane–carbon cloth assembly for submerged membrane bioreactors to apply an intermittent electric field for fouling suppression. Sep Purif Technol 88:202–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arcila JS, Buitrón G (2016) Microalgae-bacteria aggregates: effect of the hydraulic retention time on the municipal wastewater treatment, biomass settleability and methane potential. J Chem Technol Biotechnol n/a-n/a.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4901 Google Scholar
  3. Baawain MS, Al-Omairi A, Choudri BS (2014) Characterization of domestic wastewater treatment in Oman from three different regions and current implications of treated effluents. Environ Monit Assess 186:2701–2716.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3572-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahadır EB, Sezgintürk MK (2016) Applications of graphene in electrochemical sensing and biosensing. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 76:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2015.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bani-Melhem K, Elektorowicz M (2010) Development of a novel submerged membrane electro-bioreactor (SMEBR): performance for fouling reduction. Environ Sci Technol 44:3298–3304.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es902145g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell KY, Wells MJM, Traexler KA et al (2011) Emerging pollutants. Water Environ Res 83:1906–1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benami M, Gross A, Herzberg M et al (2013) Assessment of pathogenic bacteria in treated graywater and irrigated soils. Sci Total Environ 458:298–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett A (2015) Developments in desalination and water reuse. Filtr Sep 52:28–33Google Scholar
  9. Blanky M, Rodríguez-Martínez S, Halpern M, Friedler E (2015) Legionella pneumophila: from potable water to treated greywater; quantification and removal during treatment. Sci Total Environ 533:557–565.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolotin KI (2014) Graphene. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradder P, Ling SK, Wang S, Liu S (2011) Dye adsorption on layered graphite oxide. J Chem Eng Data 56:138–141.  https://doi.org/10.1021/je101049g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Butler E, Hung Y-T, Suleiman Al Ahmad M et al (2015) Oxidation pond for municipal wastewater treatment. Appl Water Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0285-z Google Scholar
  13. Cai W, Liu W, Han J, Wang A (2016) Enhanced hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cell with 3D self-assembly nickel foam-graphene cathode. Biosens Bioelectron 80:118–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chandra V, Kim KS (2011) Highly selective adsorption of Hg2+ by a polypyrrole-reduced graphene oxide composite. Chem Commun (Camb) 47:3942–3944.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc00005e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chandra V, Park J, Chun Y et al (2010) Water-dispersible magnetite-reduced graphene oxide composites for arsenic removal. ACS Nano 4:3979–3986.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1008897 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen Y, Jiang W, Liang DT, Tay JH (2008) Biodegradation and kinetics of aerobic granules under high organic loading rates in sequencing batch reactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79:301–308.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1421-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Choi C, Cui Y (2012) Recovery of silver from wastewater coupled with power generation using a microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol 107:522–525.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cieślik BM, Namieśnik J, Konieczka P (2015) Review of sewage sludge management: standards, regulations and analytical methods. J Clean Prod 90:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Craciun MF, Russo S, Yamamoto M, Tarucha S (2011) Tuneable electronic properties in graphene. Nano Today 6:42–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2010.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dai H, Yang H, Liu X et al (2016) Electrochemical evaluation of nano-Mg(OH)2/graphene as a catalyst for hydrogen evolution in microbial electrolysis cell. Fuel 174:251–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de-Bashan LE, Bashan Y (2010) Immobilized microalgae for removing pollutants: review of practical aspects. Bioresour Technol 101:1611–1627.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Demirbas A (2009) Agricultural based activated carbons for the removal of dyes from aqueous solutions: a review. J Hazard Mater 167:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DeNicola E, Aburizaiza OS, Siddique A et al (2015) Climate change and water scarcity: the case of Saudi Arabia. Ann Glob Heal 81:342–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ElMekawy A, Hegab HM, Dominguez-Benetton X, Pant D (2013) Internal resistance of microfluidic microbial fuel cell: challenges and potential opportunities. Bioresour Technol 142:672–682.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.05.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ElMekawy A, Hegab HM, Vanbroekhoven K, Pant D (2014) Techno-productive potential of photosynthetic microbial fuel cells through different configurations. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 39:617–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ElMekawy A, Hegab HM, Mohanakrishna G et al (2016) Technological advances in CO2 conversion electro-biorefinery: a step toward commercialization. Bioresour Technol 215:357–370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ElMekawy A, Hegab HM, Losic D et al (2017) Applications of Graphene in microbial fuel cells: the gap between promise and reality. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:1389–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eroglu E, Smith SM, Raston CL (2015) Application of various immobilization techniques for algal bioprocesses. In: Moheimani NR, McHenry MP, de Boer K, Bahri PA (eds) Biomass and biofuels from microalgae. Springer, Cham, pp 19–44Google Scholar
  29. Feng L, Yan Y, Chen Y, Wang L (2011) Nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes as efficient and durable metal-free cathodic catalysts for oxygen reduction in microbial fuel cells. Energy Environ Sci 4:1892–1899.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01153g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gao W, Majumder M, Alemany LB et al (2011) Engineered graphite oxide materials for application in water purification. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:1821–1826.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am200300u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geim AK, Novoselov KS (2007) The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 6:183–191.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1849 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goyal M, Bhagat M, Dhawan R (2009) Removal of mercury from water by fixed bed activated carbon columns. J Hazard Mater 171:1009–1015.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gu H, Yu Y, Liu X et al (2012) Layer-by-layer self-assembly of functionalized graphene nanoplates for glucose sensing in vivo integrated with on-line microdialysis system. Biosens Bioelectron 32:118–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2011.11.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gupta SS, Sreeprasad TS, Maliyekkal SM et al (2012) Graphene from sugar and its application in water purification. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:4156–4163.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am300889u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gutiérrez-Padilla MGD, Bielefeldt A, Ovtchinnikov S et al (2010) Biogenic sulfuric acid attack on different types of commercially produced concrete sewer pipes. Cem Concr Res 40:293–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. He X, Iasmin M, Dean LO et al (2011) Evidence for fat, oil, and grease (FOG) deposit formation mechanisms in Sewer lines. Environ Sci Technol 45:4385–4391.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es2001997 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hegab HM, Zou L (2015) Graphene oxide-assisted membranes: fabrication and potential applications in desalination and water purification. J Membr Sci 484:95–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hegab HM, ElMekawy A, Barclay TG et al (2015) Fine-tuning the surface of forward osmosis membranes via grafting graphene oxide: performance patterns and biofouling propensity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:18004–18016.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b04818 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hegab HM, ElMekawy A, Barclay TG et al (2016a) Effective in-situ chemical surface modification of forward osmosis membranes with polydopamine-induced graphene oxide for biofouling mitigation. Desalination 385:126–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hegab HM, ElMekawy A, Barclay TG et al (2016b) Single-step assembly of multifunctional poly(tannic acid)-graphene Oxide coating to reduce biofouling of forward Osmosis membranes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:17519–17528.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b03719 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hegab HM, ElMekawy A, Zou L et al (2016c) The controversial antibacterial activity of graphene-based materials. Carbon 105:362–376.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hou J, Liu Z, Zhang P (2013) A new method for fabrication of graphene/polyaniline nanocomplex modified microbial fuel cell anodes. J Power Sour 224:139–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Imamoglu M, Tekir O (2008) Removal of copper (II) and lead (II) ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption on activated carbon from a new precursor hazelnut husks. Desalination 228:108–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kampschreur MJ, Temmink H, Kleerebezem R et al (2009) Nitrous oxide emission during wastewater treatment. Water Res 43:4093–4103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Krishnan S, Weinman CJ, Ober CK (2008) Advances in polymers for anti-biofouling surfaces. J Mater Chem 18:3405.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b801491d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321:385–388.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157996 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lee J, Chae H-R, Won YJ et al (2013) Graphene oxide nanoplatelets composite membrane with hydrophilic and antifouling properties for wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci 448:223–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.08.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Leenaerts O, Partoens B, Peeters FM (2008) Graphene: a perfect nanoballoon. Appl Phys Lett 93:193107.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3021413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Li XY, Yang SF (2007) Influence of loosely bound extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on the flocculation, sedimentation and dewaterability of activated sludge. Water Res 41:1022–1030.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.06.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Li J, Guo S, Zhai Y, Wang E (2009) Nafion–graphene nanocomposite film as enhanced sensing platform for ultrasensitive determination of cadmium. Electrochem Commun 11:1085–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Li N, Liu L, Yang F (2014) Highly conductive graphene/PANi-phytic acid modified cathodic filter membrane and its antifouling property in EMBR in neutral conditions. Desalination 338:10–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.01.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Liu Y, Rafailovich MH, Malal R et al (2009) Engineering of bio-hybrid materials by electrospinning polymer-microbe fibers. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:14201–14206.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903238106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Liu C, Alwarappan S, Chen Z et al (2010a) Membraneless enzymatic biofuel cells based on graphene nanosheets. Biosens Bioelectron 25:1829–1833.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2009.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Liu CX, Zhang DR, He Y et al (2010b) Modification of membrane surface for anti-biofouling performance: effect of anti-adhesion and anti-bacteria approaches. J Membr Sci 346:121–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Liu J, Qiao Y, Guo CX et al (2012) Graphene/carbon cloth anode for high-performance mediatorless microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 114:275–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Liu L, Zhao F, Liu J, Yang F (2013a) Preparation of highly conductive cathodic membrane with graphene (oxide)/PPy and the membrane antifouling property in filtrating yeast suspensions in EMBR. J Membr Sci 437:99–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.02.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Liu M, Duan Y, Li H (2013b) Effect of modified sludge on the rheological properties and co-slurry mechanism of petroleum coke–sludge slurry. Powder Technol 243:18–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2013.03.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lv W, Li Z, Deng Y et al (2016) Graphene-based materials for electrochemical energy storage devices: opportunities and challenges. Energy Storage Mater 2:107–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2015.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McAllister MJ, Li J-L, Adamson DH et al (2007) Single sheet functionalized graphene by oxidation and thermal expansion of graphite. Chem Mater 19:4396–4404.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0630800 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mishra AK, Ramaprabhu S (2011) Functionalized graphene sheets for arsenic removal and desalination of sea water. Desalination 282:39–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mohanty N, Berry V (2008) Graphene-based single-bacterium resolution biodevice and DNA transistor: interfacing graphene derivatives with nanoscale and microscale biocomponents. Nano Lett 8:4469–4476.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl802412n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Moradi S, Azizian S (2016) Preparation of nanostructured carbon covered sand for removal of methyl violet from water. J Mol Liq 219:909–913.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.03.075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV et al (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306:666–669.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP et al (2007) Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  65. Poornima Parvathi V, Umadevi M, Bhaviya Raj R (2015) Improved waste water treatment by bio-synthesized graphene sand composite. J Environ Manage 162:299–305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pumera M (2009) Electrochemistry of graphene: new horizons for sensing and energy storage. Chem Rec 9:211–223.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.200900008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ruiz ON, Fernando KAS, Wang B et al (2011) Graphene oxide: a nonspecific enhancer of cellular growth. ACS Nano 5:8100–8107.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn202699t CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Siddiqi A, Anadon LD (2011) The water–energy nexus in Middle East and North Africa. Energy Policy 39:4529–4540.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Soylak M, Unsal YE, Yilmaz E, Tuzen M (2011) Determination of rhodamine B in soft drink, waste water and lipstick samples after solid phase extraction. Food Chem Toxicol 49:1796–1799.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.04.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sreeprasad TS, Maliyekkal SM, Lisha KP, Pradeep T (2011) Reduced graphene oxide-metal/metal oxide composites: facile synthesis and application in water purification. J Hazard Mater 186:921–931.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GHB et al (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442:282–286.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04969 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sun Y, Chen Z, Wu G et al (2016) Characteristics of water quality of municipal wastewater treatment plants in China: implications for resources utilization and management. J Clean Prod 131:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. van Loosdrecht M, Seah H, Wah YL, Cao Y (2014) The next 100 years. In: Jenkins D, Wanner J (eds) Activated sludge – 100 years and counting. IWA Publishing, London, p 407Google Scholar
  74. Varela AR, Manaia CM (2013) Human health implications of clinically relevant bacteria in wastewater habitats. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:3550–3569.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1594-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang X, Zhi L, Müllen K (2008) Transparent, conductive graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett 8:323–327.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl072838r CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang C, Feng C, Gao Y et al (2011a) Preparation of a graphene-based magnetic nanocomposite for the removal of an organic dye from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 173:92–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.07.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wang H, Wu Z, Plaseied A et al (2011b) Carbon nanotube modified air-cathodes for electricity production in microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources 196:7465–7469.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wang R, Liu J, Yu Y et al (2011c) The slurrying properties of coal water slurries containing raw sewage sludge. Energy Fuels 25:747–752.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef101409h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wang Y, Zhao C, Sun D et al (2013) A graphene/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) hybrid as an anode for high-performance microbial fuel cells. ChemPlusChem 78:823–829.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.201300102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wang J, Li Q, Qi R et al (2014) Sludge bulking impact on relevant bacterial populations in a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant. Process Biochem 49:2258–2265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2014.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang Q, Huang L, Yu H et al (2015) Assessment of five different cathode materials for Co(II) reduction with simultaneous hydrogen evolution in microbial electrolysis cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:184–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Xiao H, Ma X, Liu K (2010) Co-combustion kinetics of sewage sludge with coal and coal gangue under different atmospheres. Energy Convers Manag 51:1976–1980.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.02.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yang S, Luo S, Liu C, Wei W (2012) Direct synthesis of graphene–chitosan composite and its application as an enzymeless methyl parathion sensor. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 96:75–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zabihi M, Ahmadpour A, Asl AH (2009) Removal of mercury from water by carbonaceous sorbents derived from walnut shell. J Hazard Mater 167:230–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zhang Y, Mo G, Li X et al (2011) A graphene modified anode to improve the performance of microbial fuel cells. J Power Sour 196:5402–5407.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.02.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zhao C, Xu X, Chen J et al (2014) Highly effective antifouling performance of PVDF/graphene oxide composite membrane in membrane bioreactor (MBR) system. Desalination 340:59–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.02.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zinadini S, Vatanpour V, Zinatizadeh AA et al (2015) Preparation and characterization of antifouling graphene oxide/polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane: application in MBR for dairy wastewater treatment. J Water Process Eng 7:280–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.School of Chemical EngineeringThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  3. 3.Australian Water Quality Centre (AWQC) – South Australian Water Corporation (SA Water)AdelaideAustralia
  4. 4.Future Industries InstituteUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  5. 5.Natural and Built Environments Research CentreUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  6. 6.Separation and Conversion TechnologiesVITO - Flemish Institute for Technological ResearchMolBelgium

Personalised recommendations