Evaluation of soluble microbial products (SMP) on membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) at the fractional and overall level: a review

  • Yahui Shi
  • Jinhui Huang
  • Guangming Zeng
  • Yanling Gu
  • Yi Hu
  • Bi Tang
  • Jianxin Zhou
  • Ying Yang
  • Lixiu Shi
Reviews
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

Membrane fouling by soluble microbial products (SMP) remains one of the limitations for widespread applications of membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems. Over the past two decades, the characteristics and behaviors of SMP have attracted much attention, and efforts have been dedicated to clarify their role in membrane fouling in MBRs. However, to date, there are only few reviews directly relating this area, and the objective of previous reviews is to concentrate on SMP and their implications in biological treatment systems and their effluents. This brief review relating only to SMP-caused membrane fouling evaluation at the fractional level (SMP key components, sub-fractions and hydrophilic and hydrophobic fractions) and at the overall level (SMP overall roles, characteristics and factors) is presented, which could greatly help researchers and engineers to better understand SMP actual contribution to membrane fouling and adopt effective measures to avoid SMP-caused fouling in MBRs.

Keywords

Soluble microbial products (SMP) Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) Membrane fouling Fractionation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51578222, 51178172, 51521006, 51308076 and 51378190), the Project of Chinese Ministry of Education (113049A), and the Research Found for the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT-13R17).

References

  1. Arabi S, Nakhla G (2008) Impact of protein/carbohydrate ratio in the feed wastewater on the membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors. J Membr Sci 324:142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arabi S, Nakhla G (2010) Impact of molecular weight distribution of soluble microbial products on fouling in membrane bioreactors. Sep Purif Technol 73:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azami H, Sarrafzadeh MH, Mehrnia MR (2012) Soluble microbial products (SMPs) release in activated sludge systems: a review. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng 9:30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babatsouli P, Palogos I, Michalodimitraki E, Costa C, Kalogerakis N (2015) Evaluation of a MBR pilot treating industrial wastewater with a high COD/N ratio. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 90:26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bani-Melhem K, Al-Qodah Z, Al-Shannag M, Qasaimeh A, Rasool Qtaishat M, Alkasrawi M (2015) On the performance of real grey water treatment using a submerged membrane bioreactor system. J Membr Sci 476:40–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boero VJ, Bowers AR Jr, Eckenfelder WWE (1996) Molecular weight distribution of soluble microbial products in biological systems. Water Sci Technol 34:241–248Google Scholar
  7. Chang S (2011) Application of submerged hollow fiber membrane in membrane bioreactors: filtration principles, operation, and membrane fouling. Desalination 283:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Defang M, Yingjie M, Chufan X, Baoyu G, Yan W (2015) Fractionation, characterization and C-, N-disinfection byproduct formation of soluble microbial products in MBR processes. Biores Technol 198:380–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeQin R, LinGuo L, WeiDian Z, Yong S (2014) A mini review of soluble microbial products in the membrane bioreactor systems. Appl Mech Mater 641–642:361–364Google Scholar
  10. Ding Y, Tian Y, Li Z, Wang H, Chen L (2013a) Interaction energy evaluation of the role of solution chemistry and organic foulant composition on polysaccharide fouling of microfiltration membrane bioreactors. Chem Eng Sci 104:1028–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ding Y, Tian Y, Li Z, Wang H, Chen L (2013b) Microfiltration (MF) membrane fouling potential evaluation of protein with different ion strengths and divalent cations based on extended DLVO theory. Desalination 331:62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dong B, Jiang SY (2009) Characteristics and behaviors of soluble microbial products in sequencing batch membrane bioreactors at various sludge retention times. Desalination 243:240–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drews A (2010) Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors—characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures. J Membr Sci 363:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drews A, Vocks M, Iversen V, Lesjean B, Kraume M (2006) Influence of unsteady membrane bioreactor operation on EPS formation and filtration resistance. Desalination 192:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drews A, Vocks M, Bracklow U, Iversen V, Kraume M (2008) Does fouling in MBRs depend on SMP? Desalination 231:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duan L, Song Y, Yu H, Xia S, Hermanowicz SW (2014) The effect of solids retention times on the characterization of extracellular polymeric substances and soluble microbial products in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Biores Technol 163:395–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duan L, Tian Z, Song Y, Jiang W, Tian Y, Li S (2015) Influence of solids retention time on membrane fouling: characterization of extracellular polymeric substances and soluble microbial products. Biofouling 31:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evenblij H, Geilvoet S, van der Graaf J, van der Roest HF (2005) Filtration characterisation for assessing MBR performance: three cases compared. Desalination 178:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feng S, Zhang N, Liu H, Du X, Liu Y, Lin H (2012) The effect of COD/N ratio on process performance and membrane fouling in a submerged bioreactor. Desalination 285:232–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gao WJ, Qu X, Leung KT, Liao BQ (2012) Influence of temperature and temperature shock on sludge properties, cake layer structure, and membrane fouling in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci 421–422:131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gao DW, Wen ZD, Li B, Liang H (2013a) Membrane fouling related to microbial community and extracellular polymeric substances at different temperatures. Biores Technol 143:172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gao WJ, Han MN, Qu X, Xu C, Liao BQ (2013b) Characteristics of wastewater and mixed liquor and their role in membrane fouling. Biores Technol 128:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grelier P, Rosenberger S, Tazi-Pain A (2006) Influence of sludge retention time on membrane bioreactor hydraulic performance. Desalination 192:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guo W, Ngo H-H, Vigneswaran S, Dharmawan F, Nguyen TT, Aryal R (2010) Effect of different flocculants on short-term performance of submerged membrane bioreactor. Sep Purif Technol 70:274–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Han X, Wang Z, Ma J, Zhu C, Li Y, Wu Z (2015) Membrane bioreactors fed with different COD/N ratio wastewater: impacts on microbial community, microbial products, and membrane fouling. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:11436–11445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hao L, Liss SN, Liao BQ (2016) Influence of COD: N ratio on sludge properties and their role in membrane fouling of a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res 89:132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hong H, Zhang M, He Y, Chen J, Lin H (2014) Fouling mechanisms of gel layer in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Biores Technol 166:295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hu Y, Wang XC, Yu Z, Ngo HH, Sun Q, Zhang Q (2016) New insight into fouling behavior and foulants accumulation property of cake sludge in a full-scale membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci 510:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang D-L et al (2008) Degradation of lead-contaminated lignocellulosic waste by Phanerochaete chrysosporium and the reduction of lead toxicity. Environ Sci Technol 42:4946–4951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huang Z, Ong SL, Ng HY (2011) Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for low-strength wastewater treatment: effect of HRT and SRT on treatment performance and membrane fouling. Water Res 45:705–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huang J et al (2016a) Integrating hierarchical bioavailability and population distribution into potential eco-risk assessment of heavy metals in road dust: a case study in Xiandao District, Changsha city, China. Sci Total Environ 541:969–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huang J et al (2016b) Acyl-homoserine lactone-based quorum sensing and quorum quenching hold promise to determine the performance of biological wastewater treatments: an overview. Chemosphere 157:137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huang J, Qi F, Zeng G, Shi L, Li X, Gu Y, Shi Y (2017) Repeating recovery and reuse of SDS micelles from MEUF retentate containing Cd2+ by acidification UF. Colloids Surf A 520:361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Iorhemen OT, Hamza RA, Tay JH (2016) Membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology for wastewater treatment and reclamation: membrane fouling. Membranes 6:33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jamal Khan S, Visvanathan C, Jegatheesan V (2012) Effect of powdered activated carbon (PAC) and cationic polymer on biofouling mitigation in hybrid MBRs. Biores Technol 113:165–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jang N, Ren X, Cho J, Kim IS (2006) Steady-state modeling of bio-fouling potentials with respect to the biological kinetics in the submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR). J Membr Sci 284:352–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jarusutthirak C, Amy G (2006) Role of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane fouling and flux decline. Environ Sci Technol 40:969–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jiang T et al (2008) Modelling the production and degradation of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane bioreactors (MBR). Water Res 42:4955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jiang T, Kennedy MD, De SV, Nam SN, Nopens I, Vanrolleghem PA, Amy G (2010) Characterization of soluble microbial products and their fouling impacts in membrane bioreactors. Environ Sci Technol 44:6642–6648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Juang L-C, Tseng D-H, Chen Y-M, Semblante GU, You S-J (2013) The effect soluble microbial products (SMP) on the quality and fouling potential of MBR effluent. Desalination 326:96–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim IS, Jang N (2006) The effect of calcium on the membrane biofouling in the membrane bioreactor (MBR). Water Res 40:2756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kimura K, Naruse T, Watanabe Y (2009) Changes in characteristics of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactors associated with different solid retention times: relation to membrane fouling. Water Res 43:1033–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kimura K, Nishimura S, Miyoshi R, Hoque A, Miyoshi T, Watanabe Y (2015) Application of glyco-blotting for identification of structures of polysaccharides causing membrane fouling in a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater. Biores Technol 179:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kunacheva C, Stuckey DC (2014) Analytical methods for soluble microbial products (SMP) and extracellular polymers (ECP) in wastewater treatment systems: a review. Water Res 61:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Laspidou CS, Rittmann BE (2002a) Non-steady state modeling of extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. Water Res 36:1983–1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Laspidou CS, Rittmann BE (2002b) A unified theory for extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. Water Res 36:2711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Le-Clech P, Chen V, Fane TAG (2006) Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci 284:17–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Leenheer JA (1981) Comprehensive approach to preparative isolation and fractionation of dissolved organic carbon from natural waters and wastewaters. Environ Sci Technol 15:578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Li J, Yang F, Liu Y, Song H, Li D, Cheng F (2012) Microbial community and biomass characteristics associated severe membrane fouling during start-up of a hybrid anoxic–oxic membrane bioreactor. Biores Technol 103:43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Liang S, Song L (2007) Characteristics and fouling behaviors of dissolved organic matter in submerged membrane bioreactor systems. Environ Eng Sci 24:652–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Liang S, Liu C, Song L (2007) Soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactor operation: behaviors, characteristics, and fouling potential. Water Res 41:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lin HJ, Xie K, Mahendran B, Bagley DM, Leung KT, Liss SN, Liao BQ (2010) Factors affecting sludge cake formation in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci 361:126–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lin H et al (2014) A critical review of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in membrane bioreactors: characteristics, roles in membrane fouling and control strategies. J Membr Sci 460:110–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Liu Y, Liu H, Cui L, Zhang K (2012) The ratio of food-to-microorganism (F/M) on membrane fouling of anaerobic membrane bioreactors treating low-strength wastewater. Desalination 297:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ma Z, Wen X, Zhao F, Xia Y, Huang X, Waite D, Guan J (2013) Effect of temperature variation on membrane fouling and microbial community structure in membrane bioreactor. Biores Technol 133:462–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ma D, Meng Y, Xia C, Gao B, Wang Y (2015) Fractionation, characterization and C-, N-disinfection byproduct formation of soluble microbial products in MBR processes. Biores Technol 198:380–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mcadam EJ, Judd SJ, Cartmell E, Jefferson B (2007) Influence of substrate on fouling in anoxic immersed membrane bioreactors. Water Res 41:3859–3867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meng F, Chae SR, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin HS, Yang F (2009) Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res 43:1489–1512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Meng Y, Ladewig B, Zhang K (2011) Identification of the change of soluble microbial products on membrane fouling in membrane bioreactor (MBR). Desalination 278:126–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Menniti A, Morgenroth E (2010) Mechanisms of SMP production in membrane bioreactors: choosing an appropriate mathematical model structure. Water Res 44:5240–5251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Menniti A, Kang S, Elimelech M, Morgenroth E (2009) Influence of shear on the production of extracellular polymeric substances in membrane bioreactors. Water Res 43:4305–4315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Miyoshi T, Tsuyuhara T, Ogyu R, Kimura K, Watanabe Y (2009) Seasonal variation in membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater. Water Res 43:5109–5118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Morgan-Sagastume F, Grant AD (2005) Activated sludge deflocculation under temperature upshifts from 30 to 45 °C. Water Res 39:1061–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Namour P, Müller MC (1998) Fractionation of organic matter from wastewater treatment plants before and after a 21-day biodegradability test: a physical-chemical method for measurement of the refractory part of effluents. Water Res 32:2224–2231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ng CA et al (2013) Optimization of membrane bioreactors by the addition of powdered activated carbon. Biores Technol 138:38–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ni BJ, Zeng RJ, Fang F, Xie WM, Sheng GP, Yu HQ (2010) Fractionating soluble microbial products in the activated sludge process. Water Res 44:2292–2302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ni B-J, Rittmann BE, Yu H-Q (2011) Soluble microbial products and their implications in mixed culture biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 29:454–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ni B-J, Fang F, Xie W-M, Xu J, Yu H-Q (2012) Formation of distinct soluble microbial products by activated sludge: kinetic analysis and quantitative determination. Environ Sci Technol 46:1667–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Okamura D, Mori Y, Hashimoto T, Hori K (2009) Identification of biofoulant of membrane bioreactors in soluble microbial products. Water Res 43:4356–4362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pan JR, Su Y, Huang C (2010) Characteristics of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactor and its effect on membrane fouling. Desalination 250:778–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Poorasgari E, Farsi A, Christensen ML (2016) Fouling of a microfiltration membrane by humic-like substances: a mathematical approach to modelling permeate flux and membrane retention. Water Sci Technol 73:3033–3040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rojas MEH, Kaam RV, Schetrite S, Albasi C (2005) Role and variations of supernatant compounds in submerged membrane bioreactor fouling. Desalination 179:95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rosenberger S, Evenblij H, Poele ST, Wintgens T, Laabs C (2005) The importance of liquid phase analyses to understand fouling in membrane assisted activated sludge processes—six case studies of different European research groups. J Membr Sci 263:113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. She QH, Tang CY, Wang YN, Zhang ZJ (2009) The role of hydrodynamic conditions and solution chemistry on protein fouling during ultrafiltration. Desalination 249:1079–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shen Y, Zhao W, Xiao K, Huang X (2010) A systematic insight into fouling propensity of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactors based on hydrophobic interaction and size exclusion. J Membr Sci 346:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shen YX, Xiao K, Liang P, Sun JY, Sai SJ, Huang X (2012) Characterization of soluble microbial products in 10 large-scale membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment in China. J Membr Sci 415–416:336–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shi Y et al (2017) Exploiting extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) controlling strategies for performance enhancement of biological wastewater treatments: an overview. Chemosphere 180:396–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Subhi N, Verliefde ARD, Chen V, Le-Clech P (2012) Assessment of physicochemical interactions in hollow fibre ultrafiltration membrane by contact angle analysis. J Membr Sci 403–404:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sun J, Xiao K, Mo Y, Liang P, Shen Y, Zhu N, Huang X (2014) Seasonal characteristics of supernatant organics and its effect on membrane fouling in a full-scale membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci 453:168–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tang SJ, Wang ZW, Wu ZC, Zhou Q (2010) Role of dissolved organic matters (DOM) in membrane fouling of membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. J Hazard Mater 178:377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Temmerman LD, Maere T, Temmink H, Zwijnenburg A, Nopens I (2014) Salt stress in a membrane bioreactor: dynamics of sludge properties, membrane fouling and remediation through powdered activated carbon dosing. Water Res 63:112–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tian Y, Li Z, Lu Y (2012) Changes in characteristics of soluble microbial products and extracellular polymeric substances in membrane bioreactor coupled with worm reactor: relation to membrane fouling. Biores Technol 122:62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wang XM, Li XY, Huang X (2007) Membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR): characterisation of the sludge cake and its high filtration resistance. Sep Purif Technol 52:439–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wang Z, Wu Z, Yin X, Tian L (2008) Membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) under sub-critical flux operation: membrane foulant and gel layer characterization. J Membr Sci 325:238–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wang Z, Wu Z, Tang S (2009) Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res 43:2504–2512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wang Z, Pan W, Wang Q, Wu Z, Qi Z, Yang D (2010) Effective control of membrane fouling by filamentous bacteria in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Chem Eng J 158:608–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wang P, Wang Z, Wu Z, Mai S (2011) Fouling behaviours of two membranes in a submerged membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci 382:60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wang Q, Wang Z, Wu Z, Ma J, Jiang Z (2012a) Insights into membrane fouling of submerged membrane bioreactors by characterizing different fouling layers formed on membrane surfaces. Chem Eng J 179:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wang Z, Mei X, Ma J, Grasmick A, Wu Z (2012b) Potential foulants and fouling indicators in MBRs: a critical review. Sep Sci Technol 48:22–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wang Z, Mei X, Wu Z, Ye S, Yang D (2012c) Effects of biopolymer discharge from MBR mixture on sludge characteristics and membrane fouling. Chem Eng J 193–194:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wang Q, Wang Z, Zhu C, Mei X, Wu Z (2013) Assessment of SMP fouling by foulant–membrane interaction energy analysis. J Membr Sci 446:154–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wang F et al (2014) Effects of ionic strength on membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor. Biores Technol 156:35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wang LF, He DQ, Chen W, Yu HQ (2015) Probing the roles of Ca(2+) and Mg(2+) in humic acids-induced ultrafiltration membrane fouling using an integrated approach. Water Res 81:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wu SC, Lee CM (2011) Correlation between fouling propensity of soluble extracellular polymeric substances and sludge metabolic activity altered by different starvation conditions. Biores Technol 102:5375–5380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Yang C, Chen H, Zeng G, Yu G, Luo S (2010) Biomass accumulation and control strategies in gas biofiltration. Biotechnol Adv 28:531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Yeon KM (2006) Biofilm structure and extracellular polymeric substances in low and high dissolved oxygen membrane bioreactors. Sep Sci Technol 41:1213–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Yigit NO, Harman I, Civelekoglu G, Koseoglu H, Cicek N, Kitis M (2008) Membrane fouling in a pilot-scale submerged membrane bioreactor operated under various conditions. Desalination 231:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Yu T, Chen L, Zhang S, Zhang S (2011) A systematic study of soluble microbial products and their fouling impacts in membrane bioreactors. Chem Eng J 168:1093–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zhang J, Chua HC, Zhou J, Fane AG (2006) Factors affecting the membrane performance in submerged membrane bioreactors. J Membr Sci 284:54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zhang HF, Sun BS, Zhao XH, Gao ZH (2008) Effect of ferric chloride on fouling in membrane bioreactor. Sep Purif Technol 63:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zhang H, Gao Z, Zhang L, Song L (2014) Performance enhancement and fouling mitigation by organic flocculant addition in membrane bioreactor at high salt shock. Biores Technol 164:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Zhang X, Yue X, Liu Z, Li Q, Hua X (2015) Impacts of sludge retention time on sludge characteristics and membrane fouling in a submerged anaerobic–oxic membrane bioreactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:4893CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Environmental Science and EngineeringHunan UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution ControlHunan University, Ministry of EducationChangshaPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations