Advertisement

Metabolic uncouplers for controlling biomass accumulation in biological waste treatment systems

Mini Review

Abstract

A number of lipophilic weak acids are known to reduce biomass production in biological waste treatment systems. A definitive mechanism on how metabolic uncouplers reduce biomass accumulation is yet to be developed. In addition to the classic uncoupler mechanism of reduced ATP production efficiency, three other mechanisms are reviewed here. Firstly, uncouplers can increase maintenance energy requirements by diverting energy to non-growth processes. Secondly, uncouplers can undermine biofilm integrity through changes in EPS production, quorum signaling molecules, and potentially, cell hydrophobicity. Finally, uncoupler toxicity can challenge the microbial diversity, leading to death of some and proliferation of new species in the biofilm with reduced biomass yield. There are observations linking these mechanisms together but more work is required to clarify them. Given the challenges of acclimation, accumulation and environmental risks associated with uncouplers, understanding how these mechanisms operate is imperative in their successful and sound application.

Keywords

Activated sludge Biomass control Chemical uncoupler Metabolic uncoupling 

References

  1. Adav SS, Lee DJ, Show KY, Tay JH (2008) Aerobic granular sludge: recent advances. Biotechnol Adv 26:411–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (2008) Toxicological profile for phenols. US Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp115-c1.pdf
  3. An YH, Dickinson RB, Doyle RJ (2000) Mechanisms of bacterial adhesion and pathogenesis of implant and tissue infections. In: An YH, Friedman RJ (eds) Handbook of bacterial adhesion: principles, methods, and applications. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-224-1_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aragon C, Quiroga JM, Coello MD (2009) Comparison of four chemical uncouplers for excess sludge reduction. Environ Technol 30:707–714.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330902894372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arora PK, Srivastava A, Singh VP (2014) Bacterial degradation of nitrophenols and their derivatives. J Hazard Mater 266:42–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bassler BL (1999) How bacteria talk to each other: regulation of gene expression by quorum sensing. Curr Opin Microbiol 2:582–587.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5274(99)00025-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cai ZL, Kim D, Sorial GA (2004) Evaluation of trickle-bed air biofilter performance for MEK removal. J Hazard Mater 114:153–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cammarota MC, Sant’Anna GL (1998) Metabolic blocking of exopolysaccharides synthesis: effects on microbial adhesion and biofilm accumulation. Biotechnol Lett 20:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005394325549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casarin LS, Casarin FD, Brandelli A, Novello J, Ferreira SO, Tondo EC (2016) Influence of free energy on the attachment of Salmonella enteritidis and Listeria monocytogenes on stainless steels AISI 304 and AISI 316 LWT-Food. Sci Technol 69:131–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.01.035 Google Scholar
  10. Chen GH, Mo HK, Liu Y (2002) Utilization of a metabolic uncoupler, 3,3′,4′,5-tetrachlorosalicylanilide (TCS) to reduce sludge growth in activated sludge culture. Water Res 36:2077–2083.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00426-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen GW, Yu HQ, Xi PG, Xu DQ (2008) Modeling the yield of activated sludge in the presence of 2,4-dinitrophenol. Biochem Eng J 40:150–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcj.20071.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi NY, Bae YM, Lee SY (2015) Cell surface properties and biofilm formation of pathogenic bacteria. Food Sci Biotechnol 24:2257–2264.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-015-0301-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Detchanamurthy S (2013) Impact of different metabolic uncouplers on the specific degradation rate of toluene in a differential biofiltration reactor. University of Canterbury, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  14. Detchanamurthy S, Gostomski PA (2012) Metabolic uncouplers in environmental research: a critical review. Rev Chem Eng 28:309–317.  https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2012-0004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Detchanamurthy S, Gostomski PA (2015) Studies on the influence of different metabolic uncouplers on the biodegradation of toluene in a differential biofilter reactor. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 20:915–923.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-014-1228-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunne WM (2002) Bacterial adhesion: Seen any good biofilms lately? Clin Microbiol Rev 15:155.  https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.15.2.155-166.2002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ertesvag H (2015) Alginate-modifying enzymes: biological roles and biotechnological uses. Front Microbiol 6:10.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00523 Google Scholar
  18. Fang F, Hu HL, Qin MM, Xue ZX, Cao JS, Hu ZR (2015) Effects of metabolic uncouplers on excess sludge reduction and microbial products of activated sludge. Bioresour Technol 185:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feng XC et al (2013) Treatability study of 3,3′,4′,5-tetrachlorosalicylanilide (TCS) combined with 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP) to reduce excess sludge production in a sequence batch reactor. Bioresour Technol 143:642–646.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.05.119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feng XC, Guo WQ, Yang SS, Zheng HS, Du JS, Wu QL, Ren NQ (2014) Possible causes of excess sludge reduction adding metabolic uncoupler, 3,3′,4′,5-tetrachlorosalicylanilide (TCS), in sequence batch reactors. Bioresour Technol 173:96–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flemming HC, Wingender J (2010) The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:623–633.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2415 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuqua WC, Winans SC, Greenberg EP (1994) Quorum sensing in bacteria—the luxR-luxl family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. J Bacteriol 176:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garrett TR, Bhakoo M, Zhang Z (2008) Bacterial adhesion and biofilms on surfaces. Prog Nat Sci 18:1049–1056.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ge TT et al (2017) The toxic effects of chlorophenols and associated mechanisms in fish. Aquat Toxicol 184:78–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grundlingh J, Dargan PI, El-Zanfaly M, Wood DM (2011) 2,4-Dinitrophenol (DNP): a weight loss agent with significant acute toxicity and risk of death. J Med Toxicol 7:205–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-011-0162-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo XS, Yang JM, Liang Y, Liu JX, Xiao BY (2014) Evaluation of sludge reduction by an environmentally friendly chemical uncoupler in a pilot-scale anaerobic/anoxic/oxic process. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 37:553–560.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-013-1022-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Han YP, Luo M, Chen H, Zhang WZ, Liu JX, Xiao BY (2017) Deterioration mechanisms of sludge settleability in sludge reduction systems with metabolic uncouplers. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 123:296–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.07.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanstein WG, Hatefi Y (1974) Trinitrophenol: a membrane-impermeable uncoupler of oxidative phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:288–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Henriques IDS, Love NG (2007) The role of extracellular polymeric substances in the toxicity response of activated sludge bacteria to chemical toxins. Water Res 41:4177–4185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hiraishi A, Kawagishi T (2002) Effects of chemical uncouplers on microbial biomass production, metabolic activity, and community structure in an activated sludge system. Microbes Environ 17:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Igbinosa EO et al (2013) Toxicological profile of chlorophenols and their derivatives in the environment: the public health perspective. Sci World J 2013:11.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/460215 Google Scholar
  32. Iliuta I, Larachi F (2006) Dynamics of cells attachment, aggregation, growth and detachment in trickle-bed bioreactors. Chem Eng Sci 61:4893–4908.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.03.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jain A, Nishad KK, Bhosle NB (2007) Effects of DNP on the cell surface properties of marine bacteria and its implication for adhesion to surfaces. Biofouling 23:171–177.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010701269641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jarvik O, Viiroja A, Kamenev S, Kamenev I (2011) Activated sludge process coupled with intermittent ozonation for sludge yield reduction and effluent water quality control. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86:978–984.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jarvinen KT, Melin ES, Puhakka JA (1994) High-rate bioremediation of chlorophenol-contaminated groundwater at low-temperatures. Environ Sci Technol 28:2387–2392.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es00062a025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jiang B, Liu Y (2010) Energy uncoupling inhibits aerobic granulation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:589–595.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2122-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jiang B, Liu Y (2013) Dependence of structure stability and integrity of aerobic granules on ATP and cell communication. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:5105–5112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4315-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Katsikogianni M, Missirlis YF (2004) Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria-material interactions. Eur Cell Mater 8:37–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Keller L, Surette MG (2006) Communication in bacteria: an ecological and evolutionary perspective. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:249–258.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kim BH, Park HS, Kim HJ, Kim GT, Chang IS, Lee J, Phung NT (2004) Enrichment of microbial community generating electricity using a fuel-cell-type electrochemical cell. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:672–681.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1412-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Krasowska A, Sigler K (2014) How microorganisms use hydrophobicity and what does this mean for human needs? Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:7.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2014.00112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lazar V (2011) Quorum sensing in biofilms—How to destroy the bacterial citadels or their cohesion/power? Anaerobe 17:280–285.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.03.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewis K, Naroditskaya V, Ferrante A, Fokina I (1994) Bacterial-resistance to uncouplers. J Bioenerg Biomembr 26:639–646.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00831539 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li Y, Li AM, Xu J, Liu B, Fu LC, Li WW, Yu HQ (2012) SMP production by activated sludge in the presence of a metabolic uncoupler, 3,3′,4′,5-tetrachlorosalicylanilide (TCS). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 95:1313–1321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3765-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li P, Li HC, Li J, Guo XS, Liu JX, Xiao BY (2016) Evaluation of sludge reduction of three metabolic uncouplers in laboratory-scale anaerobic-anoxic-oxic process. Bioresour Technol 221:31–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lide (2007) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 88th edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu Y (1996) Bioenergetic interpretation on the S0X0 ratio in substrate-sufficient batch culture. Water Res 30:2766–2770.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00157-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Liu Y (2003) Chemically reduced excess sludge production in the activated sludge process. Chemosphere 50:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00551-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Liu Y, Chen GH (1997) Model of energy uncoupling for substrate-sufficient culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 55:571–576.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19970805)55:3<571:aid-bit15>3.0.co;2-j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Liu D, Thomson K, Kaiser KLE (1982) Quantitative structure-toxicity relationship of halogenated phenols on bacteria. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 29:130–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Liu Y, Yang S-F, Tay J-H, Liu Q-S, Qin L, Li Y (2004a) Cell hydrophobicity is a triggering force of biogranulation. Enzyme Microb Technol 34:371–379.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2003.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Liu Y, Yang SF, Li Y, Xu H, Qin L, Tay JH (2004b) The influence of cell and substratum surface hydrophobicities on microbial attachment. J Biotechnol 110:251–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.02.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Liu JA, Takada R, Karita S, Watanabe T, Honda Y, Watanabe T (2010) Microwave-assisted pretreatment of recalcitrant softwood in aqueous glycerol. Bioresour Technol 101:9355–9360.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Low EW, Chase HA (1999) The effect of maintenance energy requirements on biomass production during wastewater treatment. Water Res 33:847–853.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1354(98)00252-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Low EW, Chase HA, Milner MG, Curtis TP (2000) Uncoupling of metabolism to reduce biomass production in the activated sludge process. Water Res 34:3204–3212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1354(99)00364-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lv JP, Wang YQ, Zhong C, Li YC, Hao W, Zhu JR (2014) The microbial attachment potential and quorum sensing measurement of aerobic granular activated sludge and flocculent activated sludge. Bioresour Technol 151:291–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Madigan MT, Martinko JM, Parker J (2003) Brock biology of microorganisms. Pearson Education Inc, LondonGoogle Scholar
  58. Matz C (2011) Competition, communication, cooperation: molecular crosstalk in multi-species biofilms. In: Flemming H, Wingender J, Szewzyk U (eds) Biofilm highlights. Springer, Berlin.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19940-0 Google Scholar
  59. Mayhew M, Stephenson T (1997) Low biomass yield activated sludge: a review. Environ Technol 18:883–892.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593331808616607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McLaughlin SGA, Dilger JP (1980) Transport of protons across membranes by weak acids. Physiol Rev 60:825–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Michalowicz J (2005) The occurrence of chlorophenols, chlorocatechols and chlorinated methoxyphenols in drinking water of the largest cities in Poland. Pol J Environ Stud 14:327–333Google Scholar
  62. Mitchell P (1961) Coupling of phosphorylation to electron and hydrogen transfer by a chemi-osmotic type of mechanism. Nature 191:144.  https://doi.org/10.1038/191144a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Muraoka S, Terada H, Takaya T (1975) Minimum effective amount of uncouplers for rat-liver mitochondria. FEBS Lett 54:53–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(75)81066-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nicholls DG (1974) Influence of respiration and ATP hydrolysis on proton-electrochemical gradient across inner membrane of rat-liver mitochondria as determined by ion distribution. Eur J Biochem 50:305–315.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03899.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nicholls DG (1982) Bioenergetics: an introduction to the chemiosmotic theory. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Organic Chemicals Plastics and Synthetic Fibers (1993) 40 C.F.R. § 414Google Scholar
  67. Peterson BW et al (2015) Viscoelasticity of biofilms and their recalcitrance to mechanical and chemical challenges. Fems Microbiol Rev 39:234–245.  https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuu008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pirt SJ (1965) Maintenance energy of bacteria in growing cultures. Proc R Soc Ser B Biol Sci 163:224.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1965.0069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pirt SJ (1982) Maintenance energy—a general-model for energy-limited and energy-sufficient growth. Arch Microbiol 133:300–302.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00521294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pompilio A, Piccolomini R, Picciani C, D’Antonio D, Savini V, Di Bonaventura G (2008) Factors associated with adherence to and biofilm formation on polystyrene by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: the role of cell surface hydrophobicity and motility. FEMS Microbiol Rev 287:41–47.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01292.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Qiao JL, Wang L, Qian YF (2012) Fate and residual toxicity of a chemical uncoupler in a sequencing batch reactor under metabolic uncoupling conditions. Environ Eng Sci 29:599–605.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2011.0019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ray S, Peters CA (2008) Changes in microbiological metabolism under chemical stress. Chemosphere 71:474–483.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.10.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rho S, Nam GN, Shin JY, Jahng D (2007) Effect of 3,3′,4′,5-tetrachlorosalicylanilide on reduction of excess sludge and nitrogen removal in biological wastewater treatment process. J Microbiol Biotechnol 17:1183–1190Google Scholar
  74. Russell JB (1992) Another explanation for the toxicity of fermentation acids at low pH—anion accumulation versus uncoupling. J Appl Bacteriol 73:363–370.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1992.tb04990.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Russell JB (2007) The energy spilling reactions of bacteria and other organisms. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 13:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000103591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Russell JB, Cook GM (1995) Energetics of bacterial-growth—balance of anabolic and catabolic reactions. Microbiol Rev 59:48–62Google Scholar
  77. Saini G (2014) Metabolic uncoupling: biomass control strategy in microbial processes. J Microb Biochem Technol.  https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.1000e117 Google Scholar
  78. Saini G, Wood BD (2008) Metabolic uncoupling of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, under the influence of excess substrate and 3,3′,4′,5-tetrachlorosalicylanilide (TCS). Biotechnol Bioeng 99:1352–1360.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21702 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Serjeant EP, Dempsey B (1979) Ionisation constant of organic acids in aqueous solution. IUPAC chemical data series-no. 23. Pergamon Press Ltd, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  80. Starkov AA (2006) Protein-mediated energy-dissipating pathways in mitochondria. Chem Biol Interact 163:133–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2006.08.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category (2017) 40 C.F.R. § 423.Google Scholar
  82. Strand SE, Harem GN, Stensel HD (1999) Activated-sludge yield reduction using chemical uncouplers. Water Environ Res 71:454–458.  https://doi.org/10.2175/106143097x122013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tarifa MC, Brugnoni LI, Lozano JE (2013) Role of hydrophobicity in adhesion of wild yeast isolated from the ultrafiltration membranes of an apple juice processing plant. Biofouling 29:841–853.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2013.808628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Terada H (1990) Uncouplers of oxidative-phosphorylation. Environ Health Perspect 87:213–218.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3431027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Terada H, Vandam K (1975) Stoichiometry between uncouplers of oxidative-phosphorylation and respiratory chains—catalytic action of SF 6847 (3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzylidenemalononitrile). Biochim Biophys Acta 387:507–518.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2728(75)90089-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tian Y, Zhang J, Wu D, Li ZP, Cui YN (2013) Distribution variation of a metabolic uncoupler, 2,6-dichlorophenol (2,6-DCP) in long-term sludge culture and their effects on sludge reduction and biological inhibition. Water Res 47:279–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tresse O, Lescob S, Rho D (2003) Dynamics of living and dead bacterial cells within a mixed-species biofilm during toluene degradation in a biotrickling filter. J Appl Microbiol 94:849–855.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01914.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tsuneda S, Aikawa H, Hayashi H, Yuasa A, Hirata A (2003) Extracellular polymeric substances responsible for bacterial adhesion onto solid surface. FEMS Microbiol Lett 223:287–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1097(03)00399-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Van Oss CJ, Good RJ, Chaudhury MK (1986) The role of van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds in “hydrophobic interactions” between biopolymers and low energy surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 111:378–390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(86)90041-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Villarejo V (2010) LODOred-100 k surplus sludge reducer in the source. http://www.ideassonline.org/pic/doc/Bioazul.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017
  91. Wang C, Kong X, Zhang X-Y (2012) Mesophilic and thermophilic biofiltration of gaseous toluene in a long-term operation: performance evaluation, biomass accumulation, mass balance analysis and isolation identification. J Hazard Mater 229–230:94–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wang QL, Wei W, Gong YY, Yu QM, Li Q, Sun J, Yuan ZG (2017) Technologies for reducing sludge production in wastewater treatment plants: state of the art. Sci Total Environ 587:510–521.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.203 Google Scholar
  93. Xiao BY, Li HC, Yan H, Guo XS (2016) Evaluation of the sludge reduction effectiveness of a metabolic uncoupler-tetrakis (hydroxymethyl) phosphonium sulfate in anaerobic/anoxic/oxic process. Desalin Water Treat 57:5772–5780.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1005145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Xiong YH, Liu Y (2010) Biological control of microbial attachment: a promising alternative for mitigating membrane biofouling. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86:825–837.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2463-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Xu HJ, Liu Y (2010) Control of microbial attachment by inhibition of ATP and ATP-mediated autoinducer-2. Biotechnol Bioeng 107:31–36.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22796 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Xu HJ, Liu Y (2011) Control and cleaning of membrane biofouling by energy uncoupling and cellular communication. Environ Sci Technol 45:595–601.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es102911m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Yang XF, Xie ML, Liu Y (2003) Metabolic uncouplers reduce excess sludge production in an activated sludge process. Process Biochem 38:1373–1377.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0032-9592(03)00019-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ye FX, Shen DS, Li Y (2003) Reduction in excess sludge production by addition of chemical uncouplers in activated sludge batch cultures. J Appl Microbiol 95:781–786.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02052.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zhang HM, Zhou QH, Wang YQ (2010) Studies on the interactions of 2,4-dinitrophenol and 2,4-dichlorphenol with trypsin. J Fluoresc 20:507–516.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-009-0574-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zhang J, Tian Y, Zuo W, Chen L, Yin LL (2013) Inhibition of nitrification by the metabolic uncoupler, 2,6-dichlorophenol (2,6-DCP) in a sequencing batch reactor. Chem Eng J 233:132–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zheng GH, Li MN, Wang L, Chen ZY, Qian YF, Zhou Q (2008) Feasibility of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol and malonic acid as metabolic uncoupler for sludge reduction in the sequence batch reactor for treating organic wastewater. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 144:101–109.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-8101-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Zuriaga-Agusti E, Mendoza-Roca JA, Bes-Pia A, Alonso-Molina JL, Amoros-Munoz I (2016) Sludge reduction by uncoupling metabolism: sBR tests with para-nitrophenol and a commercial uncoupler. J Environ Manage 182:406–411.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Process EngineeringUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations