Ultrafine particle emissions for municipal waste-to-energy plants and residential heating boilers

  • Senem Ozgen
  • Giovanna Ripamonti
  • Stefano Cernuschi
  • Michele Giugliano
Review paper


Most recent air quality issues related to particulate matter pollution address ultrafine (UFP < 0.1 μm) and nanoparticle (NP < 0.05 μm) size fractions and their involvement in health related issues. Consequently, large efforts have been dedicated to the evaluation of their concentration levels in ambient air, with particular reference to those situations typically representative of the highest expected human exposures (urban sites with high traffic density, indoor domestic environments, industrial workplaces). Similar investigations for assessing emissions arising from outdoor sources responsible of their origin have been mostly confined to vehicle emissions, particularly light and heavy duty diesel engines, with very limited informations for stationary combustion activities, yet considered of potential significance in the whole emissions budget. Still less attention has been attracted by some specific sources like waste to energy (WTE) plants and small scale residential heating boilers, despite their large utilization in or near heavily populated areas and their interest in public stakeholders for health related concerns. Present paper reports on the available data of UFP and NP emissions from full scale WTE plants and from small scale boilers fired with fuels typical of heat generation in the residential sector (wood pellets, light oil, natural gas), with particular reference on measurements conducted with those sampling techniques proposed recently for investigating also the contribution of the condensable fraction from semivolatile flue gas components on primary UFP concentrations and corresponding size distributions.


Ultrafine particles Nanoparticles Dilution sampling Waste-to-energy plants Residential heating boilers 



The research program was conducted by LEAP (Laboratorio Energia e Ambiente Piacenza) and Politecnico di Milano with the financial support of FederAmbiente, Italian Federation of Public Environmental Services.


  1. Bao J, Tang L, Song S, Xiong G (2012) Separation of fine particles from gases in wet flue gas desulfurization system using a cascade of double towers. Energy Fuels 26:2090–2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biswas P, Wu C (2005) Nanoparticles and the environment. J Air Waste Manag 55:708–746Google Scholar
  3. Buonanno G, Ficco G, Stabile L (2009) Size distribution and number concentration of particles at the stack of a municipal waste incinerator. Waste Manag 29:749–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buonanno G, Stabile L, Avino P, Belluso E (2011) Chemical, dimensional and morphological ultrafine particle characterization from a waste-to-energy plant. Waste Manag 31:2253–2262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cernuschi S, Giugliano M, Ozgen S, Consonni S (2012) Number concentration and chemical composition of ultrafine and nanoparticles from WTE (waste to energy) plants. Sci Total Environ 420:319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang MC, Chow JC, Watson JG, Hopke PK, Yi SM, England GC (2004) Measurement of ultrafine particle size distributions from coal-, oil-, and gas-fired stationary combustion sources. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 54:1494–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corio L, Sherwell J (2000) In-stack condensible particulate matter measurements and issues. J Air Waste Manag 50:207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EC (2006) European commission, integrated pollution prevention and control reference document on best available techniques for waste incineration, August 2006Google Scholar
  9. EN (2001) Stationary source emissions—determination of low range mass concentration of dust. Manual gravimetric method. European standard 13284-1Google Scholar
  10. England G, Watson J, Chow J, Zielinska B, Chang M, Loos K, Hidy G (2007) Dilution-based emissions sampling from stationary sources: part 1—compact sampler methodology and performance. J Air Waste Manag 57:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaegauf Ch, Wieser U, Macquat Y (2001) Field investigation of nanoparticle emissions from various biomass combustion systems. In: Nussbaumer T (ed) Proceedings of the international seminar of IEA bioenergy task 32: aerosols from biomass combustion. Zürich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoek G, Boogaard H, Knol A, de Hartog J, Slottje P, Ayres JG, Borm P, Brunekreef B, Donaldson K, Forastiere F, Holgate S, Kreyling WG, Nemery B, Pekkanen J, Stone V, Wichmann HE, van der Sluijs J (2010) Concentration response functions for ultrafine particles and all-cause mortality and hospital admissions: results of a European expert panel elicitation. Environ Sci Technol 44:476–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kennedy IM (2007) The health effects of combustion generated aerosols. Proc Comb Inst 31:2757–2770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kittelson DB (1998) Engines and nanoparticles: a review. J Aerosol Sci 29:575–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lighty JS, Veranth JM, Sarofim AF (2000) Combustion aerosols: factors governing their size and composition and implications to human health. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 50:1565–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lind T, Hokkinen J, Jokiniemi JK, Hillamo R, Makkonen U, Raukola A, Rintanen J, Saviharju K (2006) Electrostatic precipitator performance and trace element emissions from two kraft recovery boilers. Environ Sci Technol 40:584–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maguhn J, Karg E, Kettrup A, Zimmermann R (2003) On-line analysis of the size distribution of fine and ultrafine aerosol particles in flue and stack gas of a municipal waste incineration plant: effect of dynamic process control measures and emission reduction devices. Environ Sci Technol 37:4761–4770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McMurry PH (2000) A review of atmospheric aerosol measurements. Atmos Environ 34:1959–1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morawska L, Ristovski Z, Jayaratne R, Keogh D, Ling X (2008) Ambient nano and ultrafine particles from motor vehicle emissions: characteristics, ambient processing and implications on human exposure. Atmos Env 42:8113–8138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Persp 113:823–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sinanis S, Wix A, Ana L, Schaber K (2008) Characterization of sulphuric acid and ammonium sulphate aerosols in wet flue gas cleaning processes. Chem Eng Process 47:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. US EPA (2004) Environmental protection agency conditional test method (CTM) 039 measurement of PM2.5 and PM10 emissions by dilution sampling (constant sampling rate procedures). CTM-039 (04_Rev 2) July 2004Google Scholar
  23. Wichmann HE, Peters A (2003) Epidemiological evidence of the effects of ultrafine particle exposure. In: Brown LM, Collings N, Harrison RM, Maynard AD, Maynard RL (eds) Ultrafine particles in the atmosphere. Imperial College Press, London, p 247Google Scholar
  24. Zeuthen JH, Pedersen AJ, Hansen J, Frandsen FJ, Livbjerg H (2007) Combustion aerosols from municipal waste incineration—effect of fuel feedstock and plant operation. Combust Sci and Tech 179:2171–2198CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Senem Ozgen
    • 1
  • Giovanna Ripamonti
    • 1
  • Stefano Cernuschi
    • 1
  • Michele Giugliano
    • 1
  1. 1.Politecnico di MilanoDIIAR, Environmental Engineering SectionMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations