Advertisement

Bond yield and credit rating: evidence of Chinese local government financing vehicles

  • Hang Luo
  • Linfeng Chen
Original Research
  • 83 Downloads

Abstract

Excessive borrowing of local governments in China sparked concerns that the debt may threaten the financial stability of the economy and ultimately cause economic collapse. It becomes critically important to understand the credit rating of China’s local government financing vehicle (LGFV) bonds and the association between the yields, credit ratings, and bond characteristics under this circumstance. We use a complete pooled data set of 771 LGFV bond issues from 1999 to 2011 and OLS and two-stage-least-squares regressions to examine how credit ratings might affect LGFV bond yields and an ordered probit model to study the determinants of credit ratings. The main findings are: (1) bond characteristic variables, such as duration and guarantee, matter in determining yields though credit rating plays a major role in determining yields of LGFV bond issues; (2) bond issue size and bond type are the main determinants of LGFV bond credit ratings, while the bond issuer characteristics have little explanatory power; (3) at least in Eastern China, smaller credit rating agency tend to give better ratings after controlling for bond issuer and issue characteristics.

Keywords

Yield Credit rating Local government financing vehicle (LGFV) China 

JEL Classification

G20 G24 G28 

References

  1. Allen A et al (2009) Should more local governments purchase a bond rating? Rev Quant Financ Acc 32(4):421–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman EI (1968) Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J Finance 23(4):589–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altman EI (1981) Application of classification techniques in business, banking, and finance. Jai Press, GreenwichGoogle Scholar
  4. Altman EI, Rijken HA (2004) How rating agencies achieve rating stability. J Bank Finance 28(11):2679–2714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amato JD, Furfine CH (2004) Are credit ratings procyclical? J Bank Finance 28(11):2641–2677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker B, Milbourn T (2011) How did increased competition affect credit ratings? J Financ Econ 101(3):493–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhojraj S, Sengupta P (2003) Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: the role of institutional investors and outside directors. J Bus 76(3):455–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boardman CM, McEnally RW (1981) Factors affecting seasoned corporate bond prices. J Financ Quant Anal 16(2):207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bottelier P (2004) China’s emerging domestic debt markets. Working Paper No. 202 (January). Stanford Center for International Development, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Cantor R (2004) An introduction to recent research on credit ratings. J Bank Finance 28(11):2565–2573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cantor R, Packer F (1997) Differences of opinion and selection bias in the credit rating industry. J Bank Finance 21(10):1395–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheung S (1996) Provincial credit rating in Canada: an ordered probit analysis. Bank of Canada, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke DC (2016) The law of China’s Local Government Debt crisis: local government financing vehicles and their bonds. GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2016–31. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2821331
  14. Cohen A (1962) Yield on new underwritten corporate bonds. J Finance 42:585–605Google Scholar
  15. Crabbe L, Post MA (1994) The effect of a rating downgrade on outstanding commercial paper. J Finance 49(1):39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crabtree AD, Maher JJ (2005) Earnings predictability, bond ratings, and bond yields. Rev Quant Financ Acc 25(3):233–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dabla-Norris E (2005) Issues in intergovernmental fiscal relations in China. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  18. Feng X (2014) Local government debt and municipal bonds in China: problems and a framework of Rules. Cph J Asian Stud 31(2):23–53Google Scholar
  19. Fisher L (1959) Determinants of risk premiums on corporate bonds. J Polit Econ 67(3):217–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fung WKH, Rudd A (1986) Pricing new corporate bond issues: an analysis of issue cost and seasoning effects. J Finance 41(3):633–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gande A et al (1997) Bank underwriting of debt securities: Modern evidence. Rev Financ Stud 10(4):1175–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hattori T, Miyake H (2015) Empirical analysis of yield determinants in Japan’s municipal bond market: does credit risk premium exist? MPRA working paper No. 67127Google Scholar
  23. Horrigan JO (1966) The determination of long-term credit standing with financial ratios. J Account Res 4:44–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. John K et al (2003) Credit ratings, collateral, and loan characteristics: Implications for yield. J Bus 76(3):371–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kao C, Wu C (1994) A re-examination of the impact of credit ratings and economic factors on state bond yields. Rev Quant Financ Acc 4(1):59–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaplan RS, Urwitz G (1979) Statistical models of bond ratings: a methodological inquiry. J Bus 52:231–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kennedy S (2003) China’s credit rating agencies struggle for relevance. China Bus Rev 30(6):36–40Google Scholar
  28. Kidwell DS et al (1984) SEC Rule 415: The ultimate competitive bid. J Financ Quant Anal 19(2):183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lamy RE, Thompson GR (1988) Risk premia and the pricing of primary issue bonds. J Bank Finance 12(4):585–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee JL (2006) Credit raters in China take generous view. Wall Street JGoogle Scholar
  31. Mizen P, Tsoukas S (2013) What promotes greater use of the corporate bond market? a study of the issuance behaviour of firms in Asia. Oxford Econ Pap 66(1):227–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moon CG, Stotsky JG (1993) Testing the differences between the determinants of moody’s and standard and poor’s ratings an application of smooth simulated maximum likelihood estimation. J Appl Econom 8(1):51–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nanda V, Singh R (2004) Bond insurance: What is special about munis? J Finance 59(5):2253–2280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Poon WPH, Chan KC (2008) An empirical examination of the informational content of credit ratings in China. J Bus Res 61(7):790–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pottier SW, Sommer DW (1999) Property-liability insurer financial strength ratings: differences across rating agencies. J Risk Insur 66:621–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schultz P (2012) The market for new issues of municipal bonds: The roles of transparency and limited access to retail investors. J Financ Econ 106(3):492–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sorensen EH (1979) The impact of underwriting method and bidder competition upon corporate bond interest cost. J Finance 34(4):863–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sufi A (2007) The real effects of debt certification: Evidence from the introduction of bank loan ratings. Rev Financ Stud 22(4):1659–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Velázquez AM (2009) The information content and redistribution effects of state and municipal rating changes in Mexico. Economics: The Open-Acess, Open-Assessment E-J 3(2009–38):1–21Google Scholar
  40. Weinstein M (1981) The systematic risk of corporate bonds. J Financ Quant Anal 16(3):257–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. West RR (1970) An alternative approach to predicting corporate bond ratings. J Account Res 7:118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. White H (1980) “A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econom J Econom Soc 48:817–838Google Scholar
  43. Ziebart DA, Reiter SA (1992) Bond ratings, bond yields and financial information. Contemp Account Res 9(1):252–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsXihua UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Department of Research and DevelopmentMoody’s Affiliate – CCXIBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations