Advertisement

Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 543–563 | Cite as

Exploring the transitional behavior among value and growth stocks

  • Gengnan Chiang
Original Research

Abstract

This study explored the transitional behavior among value and growth stocks based on a balanced panel comprising 520 firms from small-cap S&P 600, mid-cap S&P 400, and large-cap S&P 500 companies during 1999–2008. By employing the nonlinear panel smooth transition regression model, we determined that the annual market-adjusted stock returns were positively related to contemporaneous changes in earnings per share and total asset growth rates and negatively related to the log-transformed 1-year lagged price-to-book equity ratio (LP/B) using the log-transformed 1-year lagged market equity as a transition variable. Our empirical findings are consistent with those by Lakonishok et al. (J Finance 49:1541–1578, 1994), who hypothesized that investors overreact to past firm performance, and Fama and French (Finance Anal J 63:48–58, 2007a, Finance Anal J 63:44–54, 2007b), who discussed the converging P/B ratios caused by the mean reversion in growth, profitability, and expected returns. The three transitional determinants are critical to describing the transitional behavior among value and growth stocks. Moreover, our empirical results indicated that a threshold value of the log-transformed 1-year lagged market equity exists, separating the sample into two groups: value and growth stocks. In addition, the robust test confirmed that the value stocks obtained higher market-adjusted returns during out-of-sample years from 2009 to 2012. These findings have far-reaching implications for institutional investors when creating a profitable and effective investment strategy, and also for CEOs of S&P companies when investing to maximize firm value.

Keywords

Market-adjusted stock return Change in EPS Total asset growth rate Price-to-book equity ratio Market equity Investment opportunity 

JEL Classification

C33 C51 D92 G3 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the editor (Prof. Cheng-few Lee) and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and valuable suggestions.

References

  1. Anderson CW, Garcia-Feijoo L (2006) Empirical evidence on capital investment, growth options, and security returns. J Finance 61:171–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Affleck-Graves J, Miller RE (2003) The information content of calls of debt: evidence from long-run stock returns. J Finance Res 26:421–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman W, Conover C, Miller R (2001) The performance of growth stocks and value stocks in the Pacific Basin. Rev Pac Basin Finance Mark Polic 4(2):95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Best R, Hodges C, Yoder J (2006) Expected earnings growth and portfolio performance. Rev Quant Finance Account 26:431–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billet M, Flannery M, Garfinkel J (2006) Are bank loans special? Evidence on the post-announcement performance of bank borrowers. J Finance Quant Anal 41:733–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlson M, Fisher A, Giammarino R (2004) Corporate investment and asset price dynamics: implications for the cross-section of returns. J Finance 59:2577–2603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen C, Lung P, Wang F (2009) Mispricing and the cross-section of stock returns. Rev Quant Finance Account 32:317–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi I (2001) Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Finance 20:249–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper I (2006) Asset pricing implications of nonconvex adjustment costs and irreversibility of investment. J Finance 61:139–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper M, Gulen H, Schill M (2008) Asset growth and the cross-section of stock returns. J Finance 68:1609–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fama E, French K (2007a) Migration. Finance Anal J 63:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fama E, French K (2007b) The anatomy of value and growth stock returns. Finance Anal J 63:44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fama E, French K (2008) Dissecting anomalies. J Finance 63:1653–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gomes J, Kogan L, Zhang L (2003) Equilibrium cross-section of returns. J Polit Econ 111:693–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. González A, Teräsvirta T, van Dijk D (2005) Panel smooth transition regression models. Research Paper Series 165, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  16. Granger C, Teräsvirta T (1993) Modelling nonlinear economic relationships. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen BE (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing and inference. J Econom 93:345–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ibbotson R (1975) Price performance of common stock new issues. J Finance Econ 3:235–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jansen ES, Teräsvirta T (1996) Testing parameter constancy and super exogeneity in econometric equation. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 58:735–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lakonishok J, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1994) Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. J Finance 49:1541–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li L, Livdan D, Zhang L (2006) Optimal market timing. Working paper 12014, NBER working paper seriesGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu L, Whited T, Zhang L (2009) Investment-based expected stock returns. J Polit Econ 117:1105–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loughran T, Ritter J (1995) The new issues puzzle. J Finance 50:23–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loughran T, Vijh A (1997) Do long-term shareholders benefit from corporate acquisitions? J Finance 52:1765–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maddala GS, Wu S (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 61:631–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McConnell J, Ovtchinnikov A (2004) Predictability of long-term spinoff returns. J Invest Manag 2(3):35–44Google Scholar
  27. Michaely R, Thaler R, Womack K (1995) Price reactions to dividend initiations and omissions: overreaction or drift? J Finance 50:573–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller M, Modigliani F (1961) Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. J Bus 34:411–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Myers S (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Finance Econ 5:147–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rau R, Vermaelen T (1998) Glamour, value and the post-acquisition performance of acquiring firms. J Finance Econ 49:223–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Spiess K, Affleck-Graves J (1999) The long-run performance of stock returns following debt offerings. J Finance Econ 54:45–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Terasvirta T (1994) Specification, estimation, and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models. J Am Stat Assoc 89(425):208–218Google Scholar
  33. Titman S, Wei KC, Xie F (2004) Capital investments and stock returns. J Finance Quant Anal 39:677–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vuolteenaho T (2002) What drives firm-level stock returns? J Finance 57:233–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang G (2000) Accounting information, capital investment decisions, and equity valuation: theory and empirical implications. J Account Res 38:271–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang L (2005) The value premium. J Finance 60:67–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Finance, College of FinanceFeng Chia UniversityTaichung CityTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations