Advertisement

Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 159–170 | Cite as

Uncovering a positive risk-return relation: the role of implied volatility index

  • Angelos Kanas
Original Research

Abstract

We report empirical evidence suggesting a strong and positive risk-return relation for the daily S&P 100 market index if the implied volatility index is included as an exogenous variable in the conditional variance equation. This result holds for alternative GARCH specifications and conditional distributions. Monte Carlo evidence suggests that if implied volatility is not included, whilst is should be, the risk-return relation is more likely to be negative or weak.

Keywords

S&P 100 Implied volatility index GARCH-M Risk-return relation 

JEL Classification

G12 C22 

References

  1. Arora RK, Das H, Jain PK (2009) Stock returns and volatility: evidence from select emerging markets. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Pol 12:567–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baillie R, DeGennaro R (1990) Stock returns and volatility. J Financ Quant Anal 25:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banerjee P, Doran J, Peterson R (2007) Implied volatility and future portfolio returns. J Bank Financ 31:3183–3199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollerslev T, Wooldridge J (1992) Quasi maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time-varying covariances. Econom Rev 11:143–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai C, Faff R, Hillier D, McKenzie M (2006) Modelling returns and conditional volatility exposures in global stock markets. Rev Quant Financ Account 27:145–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng X, Smith D (2012) Disclosure versus recognition: the case of expensing stock options. Rev Quant Financ Account (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  7. Day T, Lewis C (1992) Stock market volatility and the information content of stock index options. J Econom 52:267–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drew A, Marsden A, Veeraraghavan M (2007) Does idiosyncratic volatility matter? New Zealand evidence. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Pol 10:289–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliott G, Rothenberg T, Stock J (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64:813–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glosten L, Jagannathan R, Runkle D (1993) On the relation between the expected value and volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. J Financ 48:1779–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goyal A, Santa-Clara P (2003) Idiosyncratic risk matters. J Financ 58:975–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo H, Neely C (2008) Investigating the intertemporal risk-return relation in international stock markets with the component GARCH model. Econ Lett 99:371–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guo H, Whitelaw R (2006) Uncovering the risk-return relation in the stock market. J Financ 62:1433–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamilton JD (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobbes G, Lam F, Loudon G (2007) Regime shifts in the stock-bond relation in Australia. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Pol 10:81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalev PS, Liu WM, Pham KP, Jarnecic E (2004) Public information arrival and volatility of intraday stock returns. J Bank Financ 28:1441–1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanas A (2012) The risk-return relation and VIX: evidence from the S&P 500. Emp Ec (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  18. Lamoureux CG, Lastrapes WD (1990) Heteroscedasticity in stock return data: volume versus GARCH effects. J Financ 45:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lettau M, Ludvigson S (2003) Measuring and modeling variation in the risk-return trade-off. Working Paper, New York UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. Lundblad C (2007) The risk return tradeoff in the long run: 1836–2003. J Financ Econ 85:123–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson DB (1991) Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econometrica 59:349–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Psychoyios D, Dotsis G, Markellos R (2010) A jump diffusion model for VIX volatility options and futures. Rev Quant Financ Account 35:245–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of PiraeusPiraeusGreece

Personalised recommendations