Advertisement

Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 15–39 | Cite as

The role of industry classification in estimating discretionary accruals

  • Karel Hrazdil
  • Thomas Scott
Original Research

Abstract

This study compares the properties of the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) with three alternatives: Standard Industrial Classification, North American Industry Classification System, and Fama–French classification. First, we demonstrate that GICS results in more reliable industry groupings for financial analysis and research; in particular, we find that estimations of performance-adjusted discretionary accruals (PADA) based on GICS significantly outperform estimates derived using each of the three alternative classifications systems in capturing discretionary accruals. Second, we show that the difference between GICS and the other systems can provide significantly different results, and hence different inferences, in empirical studies that rely on industry classification. Specifically, we revisit findings by Teoh et al. (J Financ 53[6]:1935–1970, 1998a) and assess the conclusion that initial public offering (IPO) issuers with high abnormal accruals during the IPO year experience subsequent poorer long-term stock performance than issuers with low discretionary accruals do. We find that this result disappears when PADA estimates are based on GICS. Our results call for serious consideration of using GICS classifications in research, either in the primary analysis or as a necessary corroboration.

Keywords

Discretionary accruals Industry classification GICS IPO 

JEL Classification

G12 G14 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Editor and an anonymous referee for valuable comments that have been of great help in improving the quality of this report. We also acknowledge helpful comments from J. Callen, I. Mathur, K. Lo, P. Clarkson, S. Fortain, D. Tsang, D. Chung, P. Hopkins, and workshop participants at Simon Fraser University, McGill University, the 2010 Canadian Academic Accounting Association Conference, the 2010 American Accounting Association Conference, and the 2011 European Accounting Conference. We acknowledge financial support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Gloria Kim provided excellent research assistance. The GICS system (GIGS History) was licensed from S&P for the period from March 1, 2008, to March 1, 2009. All other data were obtained from publicly available sources cited in the study. Any errors are ours.

References

  1. Ali A, Klasa S, Yeung E (2009) The limitations of industry concentration measures constructed with Compustat data: Implications for finance research. Rev Financ Stud 22(10):3839–3871. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhn103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball R, Shivakumar L (2008) Earnings quality at initial public offerings. J Account Econ 45(2–3):324–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhojraj S, Lee C, Oler D (2003) What’s my line? A comparison of industry classification schemes for capital market research. J Account Res 41(5):745–769. doi: 10.1046/j.1475-679X.2003.00122.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boni L, Womack K (2006) Analysts, industries, and price momentum. J Financ Quant Anal 41(1):85–109. doi: 10.1017/S002210900000243X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradshaw M, Richardson S, Sloan R (2001) Do analysts and auditors use information in accruals? J Account Res 39(1):45–74. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.00003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brennan M, Ashley J, Wang W (2004) Estimation and test of a simple model of intemporal capital asset pricing. J Financ 59(4):1743–1776. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00678.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burgstahler D, Dichev I (1997) Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. J Account Econ 24(1):99–126. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00017-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan K, Jegadeesh N, Sougiannis T (2004a) The accrual effect on future earnings. Rev Quant Finan Account 22(2):97–121. doi: 10.1023/B:REQU.0000015852.00973.8f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan W, Frankel R, Kothari SP (2004b) Testing behavioural finance theories using trends and consistency in financial performance. J Account Econ 38(1):3–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chan L, Lakonishok J, Swaminathan B (2007) Industry classifications and return comovement. Finan Anal J 63(6):56–70. doi: 10.2469/faj.v63.n6.4928 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dechow P, Sloan R, Sweeney A (1995) Detecting earnings management. The Account Rev 70(2): 193–225. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/248303
  12. Dechow P, Sloan R, Sweeney A (1996) Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemp Account Res 13(1):1–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00489.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dechow P, Richardson S, Tuna I (2003) Why are earnings kinky? An examination of the earnings management explanation. Rev Account Stud 8(2–3):355–384. doi: 10.1023/A:1024481916719 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeFond M, Jiambalvo J (1994) Debt covenant violations and manipulations of accruals. J Account Econ 17(1–2):145–176. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(94)90008-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeFond M, Park C (1999) The effect of competition on CEO turnover. J Account Econ 27(1):35–56. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00044-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Degeorge F, Patel J, Zeckhauser R (1999) Earnings management to exceed thresholds. J Bus 72(1):1–33. doi: 0021-9398/99/7201-0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fama E, French K (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J Financ Econ 33(1):3–56. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fama E, French K (1997) Industry costs of equity. J Financ Econ 43(2):153–193. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00896-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fama E, MacBeth J (1973) Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. J Pol Econ 81(3): 607–636. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831028 Google Scholar
  20. Fan Q (2007) Earnings management and ownership retention for initial public offering firms: Theory and evidence. The Account Rev 82(1):27–64. doi: 10.2308/accr.2007.82.1.27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Graham J, Kumar A (2006) Do dividend clienteles exist? Evidence on dividend preferences of retail investors. J Financ 61(3):1305–1336. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00873.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guenther D, Rosman A (1994) Differences between COMPUSTAT and CRSP SIC codes and related effects on research. J Account Econ 18(1):115–128. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(94)90021-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Healy P (1985) The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions. J Account Econ 7(1–3):85–107. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(85)90029-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hou K, Robinson D (2006) Industry concentration and average stock returns. J Financ 61(4):1927–1956. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00893.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hrazdil K, Zhang R (2012) The importance of industry classification in estimating concentration ratios. Econ Lett 114(2):224–227. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hribar P, Collins D (2002) Errors in estimating accruals: Implications for empirical research. J Account Res 40(1):105–134. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.00041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones J (1991) Earnings management during import relief investigations. J Account Res 29(2): 193–228. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2491047 Google Scholar
  28. Kahle K, Walkling R (1996) The impact of industry classifications on financial research. J Financ Quant Anal 31(3):309–332. doi: 10.2307/2331394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kile C, Phillips M (2009) Using industry classification codes to sample high-technology firms: Analysis and recommendations. J Account Audit Financ 24(1):35–58. doi: 10.1177/0148558X0902400104 Google Scholar
  30. Kothari SP, Leone A, Wasley C (2005) Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. J Account Econ 39(1):163–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krishnan G (2003) Audit quality and the pricing of discretionary accruals. Audit J Pract Theory 22(1):109–127. doi: 10.2308/aud.2003.22.1.109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krishnan J, Press E (2003) The North American industry classification system and its implications for accounting research. Contemp Account Res 20(4):685–717. doi: 10.1506/N57L-0462-856V-7144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lang M, Lundholm R (1996) The relation between security returns, firm earnings, and industry earnings. Contemp Account Res 13(2):607–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00516.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lang L, Stulz R (1992) Contagion and competitive intra-industry effects of bankruptcy announcements: An empirical analysis. J Financ Econ 32(1):45–60. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(92)90024-R CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nagata K, Hachiya T (2007) Earnings management and the pricing of initial public offerings. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Policies 10(4):541–559. doi: 10.1142/S0219091507001197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Richardson V, Waegelein J (2002) The influence of long-term performance plans on earnings management and firm performance. Rev Quant Finan Account 18(2):161–183. doi: 10.1023/A:1014517102230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Standard & Poor’s, Morgan Stanley Capital International (2008) Global industry classification standard—a guide to the GICS methodology. www.standardandpoors.com
  38. Teoh S, Welch I, Wong T (1998a) Earnings management and long-run market performance of initial public offerings. J Financ 53(6):1935–1970. doi: 10.1111/0022-1082.00079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Teoh S, Welch I, Wong T (1998b) Earnings management and the post issue underperformance in seasoned equity offerings. J Financ Econ 50(1):63–99. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00032-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tucker J, Zarowin P (2006) Does income smoothing improve earnings informativeness? The Account Rev 81(1):251–270. doi: 10.2308/accr.2006.81.1.251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yu F (2008) Analyst coverage and earnings management. J Financ Econ 88(2):245–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beedie School of BusinessSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  2. 2.School of BusinessUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations