Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 199–226 | Cite as

A Simple Induction Approach and an Efficient Trinomial Lattice for Multi-State Variable Interest Rate Derivatives Models

  • Marat V. Kramin
  • Timur V. Kramin
  • Stephen D. Young
  • Venkat G. Dharan


This paper presents an alternative approach for interest rate lattice construction in the Ritchken and Sankarasubramanian (1995) framework. The proposed method applies a parsimonious induction technique to represent the distribution of auxiliary state variables and value interest rate derivatives. In contrast to other approaches, this technique requires no numerical interpolations, approximations and iterative procedures for pricing interest rate options using a simple backward induction and, therefore, provides significant computational advantages and flexibility with respect to existing implementations. Also, the proposed trinomial interest rate lattice specification provides for a further reduction in computational costs with additional flexibility. The results of this work can be extended to a class of derivatives pricing models with path dependent state variables and generalized to multi-factor models.

Key words

induction multi-state-variable Markov process trinomial lattice derivatives valuation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersen, L., “A Simple Approach to the Pricing of Bermudan Swaptions in Multi-Factor Libor Market Model.” Working Paper, General Re Financial Products, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. Barraquand, J. and D. Martineau, “Numerical Valuation of High Dimensional Multivariate American Securities.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 30 (1995).Google Scholar
  3. Broadie, M. and P. Glasserman, “Pricing American.Style Securities Using, Simulation.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 21(8–9), 1323–1352 (1997a).Google Scholar
  4. Broadie, M. and P. Glasserman, “A Stochastic Mesh Method for Pricing High. Dimensional American Options.” Columbia University Working Paper, 1997b.Google Scholar
  5. Carr P. and G. Yang, “Simulating American Bond Options in an HJM Framework.” Quantitative Analysis in Financial Markets 2 (1998) (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  6. Clewlow, L. and C. Strickland, “Pricing Interest Rate Exotics in Multi-Factor Gaussian Interest Rate Models.” Working Paper at 128669.
  7. Das, S. and A. Sinclair, “Monte Carlo Markov Chain Methods for Derivative Pricing.” Santa Clara University Working Paper, 2001.Google Scholar
  8. Grant, D., G. Vora, and D. Weeks, “Path. Dependent Options: Extending the Monte Carlo Simulation Approach.” The University of New Mexico Working Paper, 1994.Google Scholar
  9. Heath, D., R., Jarrow, and A. Morton, “Bond Pricing and the Term Structure of Interest Rates: A New Methodology for Contingent Claims Valuation.” Econometrica 70, 77–105 (1992).Google Scholar
  10. Hull, J. and A. White, “Pricing Interest Rate Derivatives Securities.” Review of Financial Studies 3, 573–592 (1990).Google Scholar
  11. Hull, J. and A. White, “Numerical Procedures for Implementing Term Structure Models I: Single Factor Models.” Journal of Derivatives 2, 7–16 (1994).Google Scholar
  12. Li, A., P., Ritchken, and L. Sankarasubramanian, “Lattice Models for Pricing American Interest Rate Claims.” Journal of Finance 50, 719–737 (1995).Google Scholar
  13. Lin, J. and P. Ritchken, “On Pricing Derivatives in the Presence of Auxiliary State Variables.” Working Paper, 2001.Google Scholar
  14. Longstaff, F. and E. Schwartz, “Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach.” Review of Financial Studies 14, 113–147 (2001).Google Scholar
  15. Nelson, D.B. and K. Ramaswamy, “Simple Binomial Processes as Diffusion Approximations in Financial Models.” Review of Financial Studies 3, 393–430 (1990).Google Scholar
  16. Ritchken, P. and I. Chuang, “Interest Rate Option Pricing with Volatility Humps.” Review of Derivatives Research, 3, 237–262 (1999).Google Scholar
  17. Ritchken, P. and L. Sankarasubramanian, “Volatility Structures of Forward Rates and the Dynamics of the Term Structure.” Mathematical Finance 5, 55–72 (1995).Google Scholar
  18. Sinclair, A. and M. Jerrum, “Approximate Counting, Uniform Generation and Rapidly Mixing Markov Chains.” Information and Computation 82, 93–133 (1989).Google Scholar
  19. Tilley, J. A., “Valuing American Options in a Path Simulation Model.” Transactions of the Society of Actuaries 45, 83–104 (1993).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marat V. Kramin
    • 1
  • Timur V. Kramin
    • 2
  • Stephen D. Young
    • 3
  • Venkat G. Dharan
    • 4
  1. 1.Fannie Mae Portfolio Strategy Department
  2. 2.MTSKazanRussia
  3. 3.Wachovia CIB Risk ManagementUSA
  4. 4.Fannie Mae Portfolio Strategy DepartmentUSA

Personalised recommendations