Advertisement

Apophasis as the common root of radically secular and radically orthodox theologies

  • William Franke
Article

Abstract

On the one hand, we find secularized approaches to theology stemming from the Death of God movement of the 1960s, particularly as pursued by North American religious thinkers such as Thomas J.J. Altizer, Mark C. Taylor, Charles Winquist, Carl Raschke, Robert Scharlemann, and others, who stress that the possibilities for theological discourse are fundamentally altered by the new conditions of our contemporary world. Our world today, in their view, is constituted wholly on a plane of immanence, to such an extent that traditional appeals to faith in an other world become difficult to take as more than self-deception and willful blindness to our human reality. On the other hand, we hear the assertion of a new lease on life for theology and its traditional affirmation of divine transcendence over and against the putative arrogance of all claims of human autonomy. This claim is advanced particularly by theologians grouped under the banner of the so-called Radical Orthodoxy. Emanating from England, originally from the University of Cambridge in the 1980s and 1990s, this movement includes such theological thinkers as John Milbank, Graham Ward, Rowan Williams, and Catherine Pickstock. It has also explicitly styled itself “post-secularist.” I propose that both approaches are based on not very fully acknowledged and often explicitly denied premises in negative theology, which surprisingly emerges as key to fostering genuine possibilities for dialogue among apparently antagonistic theological approaches.

Keywords

Secular theology Radical Orthodoxy Negative theology Apophasis Post-secular Radical Philosophy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benson B. E. (2002) Graven ideologies: Nietzsche, Derrida & Marion on modern idolatry. Inter Varsity Press, Downers Grove, ILGoogle Scholar
  2. Boesel, C., Keller, C. (eds) (2009) Apophatic bodies: Negative theology, incarnation, and relationality. Fordham University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Caputo J. D. (1993) Against ethics: Contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  4. Caputo J. D. (1997) The prayers and tears of Jacques Derrida. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  5. Caputo J. D. (2000) More radical hermeneutics: On not knowing who we are. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  6. Caputo J. D. (2001) On religion. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Caputo J. D. (2006) The weakness of God: A theology of the event. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  8. Corbin, H. (2003 [1981]). De la théologie apophatique comme antidote du nihilisme. Le paradoxe du monothéisme. Paris: L’Herne.Google Scholar
  9. Crockett, C. (eds) (2001) Secular theology: American radical theological thought. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Crockett, C. (eds) (2006) Religion and violence in a secular world: Toward a new political theology. University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, VAGoogle Scholar
  11. Crockett C. (2011) Radical political theology: Religion and politics after liberalism. Columbia, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Cunningham C. (2002) Genealogy of nihilism: Philosophies of nothing and the difference of theology. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Cusa, N. (2002). De pace fidei. In K. Berger, & C. Nord (Eds.). Frankfurt: Insel Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. De Vries H. (2002) Religion and violence: Philosophical perspectives from Kant to Derrida. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  15. Deleuze G. (1969) Logique du sens. Minuit, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. Derrida, J. (1968). Discussion autour de La différance. Bulletin de la Société française de philosophie 62.Google Scholar
  17. Derrida, J. (1987). Comment ne pas parler: dénégations. In Psyché: inventions de l’autre (pp. 535–595). Paris: Galilée. (Translated by Coward, H. & Foshay, T. (Eds.). (1992). Derrida and Negative Theology. Albany: SUNY Press.)Google Scholar
  18. Derrida J. (1992) Donner la mort. Galilée, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Derrida J. (1993) Sauf le nom. Galilée, ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. Derrida J. (1996) Foi et savoir. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. Dionysius. (1990–1991). Corpus Dionysiacum, 2 Vols. Patristische Texte und Studien. In K. Aland & E. Mühlenberg (Eds.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. (Luibheid, C. (Trans.). (1987). Pseudo-Dionysius: The complete works. New York: Paulist Press.)Google Scholar
  22. Eckhart, M. (1958). Die deutschen Werke. In J. Quint (Ed.). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  23. Girard R. (1985) La route antique des hommes pervers. Bernard Grasset, ParisGoogle Scholar
  24. Hart K. (1989) The trespass of the sign: Deconstruction, philosophy, theology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Heidegger, M. (1986 [1927]). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. (Translated by Macquarie, J., & Robinson, E. (Eds.). (1962). Being and time. New York: Harper & Row.)Google Scholar
  26. Kearney, R. (2009). Anatheism: Returning to God after God. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Marion J.-L. (2005) Le visible et le révélé. Cerf, ParisGoogle Scholar
  28. Milbank, J. (1997). The linguistic turn as a theological turn. In The word made strange. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Milbank J., Pickstock C. (2001) Truth in Aquinas. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Milbank, J., Pickstock, C., Ward, G. (eds) (1999) Radical orthodoxy: A new theology. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller J. H. (1977) The critic as host. Critical Inquiry 3/3(Spring): 439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nault F. (1999) Déconstruction et apophatisme: À propos d’une dénégation de Jacques Derrida. Laval Théologique et Philosophique 55/3: 393–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nock, A. D., & Festugière, A. J. (1972). Corpus hermeticum, 4 Vols. (3rd ed.). Paris: Belles Letters (1st ed., 1946–1954).Google Scholar
  34. Pickstock C. (2009) Liturgical twilight—A footnote to Andrew Louth. In: Papst A., Schneider C. (eds) Encounter between eastern orthodoxy and radical orthodoxy: Transfiguring the world through the word. Ashgate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Proclus. (1864). Commentarium in Parmenidem (2nd ed). V. Cousin (Ed.). Paris. (Reprinted in Procli Philosophi Platonici. Opera inedita, pars Tertia, Continens Procli Commentarium in Platoni Parmenidem. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchandlung.)Google Scholar
  36. Shakespeare S. (2009) Derrida and theology. T&T Clark, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Turner D. (1995) The darkness of God: Negativity in Christian mysticism. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vattimo G. (2002) Dopo la cristianità à: Per un cristianesimo non religioso. Milan: Garzanti. Trans. Luca D’Isanto as After Christianity. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Vega A. (2005) Arte y santidad. Cuatro lecciones de estética apofática. Universidad Pública de Navarra, PamplonaGoogle Scholar
  40. Vega A. (2009) Estética apofática y hermenéutica del misterio: Elementos para una crítica de la visibilidad. Diánoia 54(62): 1–25Google Scholar
  41. Ward, G. (eds) (1997) The postmodern God: A theological reader. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Ward G. (2000) Cities of God. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Westphal M. (2004) Transcendence and self-transcendence: On God and the Soul. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Villa La RéunionCarcèsFrance

Personalised recommendations