Abstract
This special issue examines empirically the determinants of cartel formation, stability, and duration with the use of international evidence. Levenstein and Suslow examine the US experience; Zhou considers the problem of recidivism in cartel formation in Europe; Ghosal and Sokol examine both US and European experience with a focus on US policy changes; and Feinberg et al. analyze a recent entrant into strong antitrust enforcement: South Korea.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Marvao (2016), however, does examine how recidivism in cartel activity paradoxically tends to increase the extent of penalty reductions that are achieved through the EU Leniency Program.
References
Feinberg, R. M., Kim, H., & Park, M. The determinants of cartel duration in Korea. Review of Industrial Organization. doi:10.1007/s11151-016-9505-4.
Ghosal, V., & Sokol, D. D. Evolution of U.S. and European cartel enforcement and prosecutions. Review of Industrial Organization, this issue.
Hay, G. A., & Kelley, D. (1974). An empirical survey of price fixing conspiracies. Journal of Law and Economics, 17(1), 13–38.
Levenstein, M., & Suslow, V. Price-fixing hits home: An empirical study of U.S. price fixing conspiracies. Review of Industrial Organization, this issue.
Marvao, C. (2016). The EU Leniency Programme and Recidivism. Review of Industrial Organization, 48(1), 1–27.
Posner, R. A. (1970). A statistical study of antitrust enforcement. Journal of Law and Economics, 13(2), 365–419.
Stigler, G. J. (1964). A theory of oligopoly. Journal of Political Economy, 72(1), 44–61.
Zhou, J. The rise and fall of cartels with multi-market colluders. Review of Industrial Organization, this issue.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feinberg, R.M. Cartel Stability: Determinants and International Evidence. Rev Ind Organ 48, 357–359 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-016-9503-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-016-9503-6