Review of Industrial Organization

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 303–340 | Cite as

Failing to Choose the Best Price: Theory, Evidence, and Policy

  • Michael D. Grubb


Both the “law of one price” and Bertrand’s (J Savants 67:499–508, 1883) prediction of marginal cost pricing for homogeneous goods rest on the assumption that consumers will choose the best price. In practice, consumers often fail to choose the best price because they search too little, become confused comparing prices, and/or show excessive inertia through too little switching away from past choices or default options. This is particularly true when price is a vector rather than a scalar, and consumers have limited experience in the relevant market. All three mistakes may contribute to positive markups that fail to diminish as the number of competing sellers increases. Firms may have an incentive to exacerbate these problems by obfuscating prices, thereby using complexity to make price comparisons difficult and soften competition. Possible regulatory interventions include: simplifying the choice environment, for instance by restricting price to be a scalar; advising consumers of their expected costs under each option; or choosing on behalf of consumers.


Behavioral industrial organization Bounded rationality Search Obfuscation Switching Inertia 

JEL Classification

D43 D83 L11 L13 L15 



I am grateful to Mark Armstrong, Ben Handel, and Rani Spiegler for careful reading and many helpful comments on an earlier draft. I also thank Vera Sharunova for her excellent research assistance.


  1. Allen, B., & Thisse, J.-F. (1992). Price equilibria in pure strategies for homogeneous oligopoly. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 1(1), 63–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1430-9134.1992.00063.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, S. P., de Palma, A., & Thisse, J.-F. (1992). Discrete choice theory of product differentiation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, M. (2008). Interactions between competition and consumer policy. Competition Policy International, 4(1), 97–147.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, M. (2015). Search and ripoff externalities. Review of Industrial Organization, 47(3), 273–302. doi: 10.1007/s11151-015-9480-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong, M., & Zhou, J. (2011). Paying for prominence. The Economic Journal, 121(556), F368–F395. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02469.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. AT&T. (2014). Wireless data plans. Accessed at on November 25, 2014.
  7. Bachi, B. (2014). Competition with price similarities. Accessed from on April 30, 2015.
  8. Bachi, B., & Spiegler, R. (2014). Buridanic competition. Accessed from on January 1, 2015.
  9. Bagwell, K. (2007). The economic analysis of advertising. In M. Armstrong & R. H. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization, (Vol. 3, chapter 28, pp. 1701–1844). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  10. Bar-Gill, O. (2012). Seduction by contract: Law, economics, and psychology in consumer markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barber, B. M., Odean, T., & Zhu, N. (2009). Systematic noise. Journal of Financial Markets, 12(4), 547–569. doi: 10.1016/j.finmar.2009.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. In G. M. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. M. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of finance, (Vol. 1, part B, chapter 18, pp. 1053–1128). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  13. Baye, M. R., Morgan, J., & Scholten, P. (2006). Information, search, and price dispersion. In T. Hendershott (Ed.), Handbook on economics and information systems (Vol. 1, chapter 6, pp. 323–375). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Benartzi, S. (2001). Excessive extrapolation and the allocation of 401(k) accounts to company stock. The Journal of Finance, 56(5), 1747–1764. doi: 10.1111/0022-1082.00388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bernheim, B. D., Fradkin, A., & Popov, I. (2015). The welfare economics of default options in 401(k) plans. American Economic Review, 105(9), 2798–2837. doi: 10.1257/aer.20130907.
  16. Bernheim, B. D., & Rangel, A. (2009). Beyond revealed preference: Choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 51–104. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bertrand, J. (1883). Review of Walras’s “Théorie mathématique de la richesse sociale” and Cournot’s “Recherches sur les principles mathématiques de la théorie des richesses”. Journal de Savants, 67, 499–508. (Translation by James W. Friedman in Chapter 2 of Cournot oligopoly, Characterization and applications edited by Andrew F. Daughety, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1988).Google Scholar
  18. Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2013). Salience and consumer choice. Journal of Political Economy, 121(5), 803–843. doi: 10.1086/673885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2014). Competition for attention. Accessed at on December 8, 2014.
  20. Braithwaite, D. (1928). The economic effects of advertisement. The Economic Journal, 38(149), 16–37. doi: 10.2307/2224394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bronnenberg, B. J., Dubé, J.-P. H., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2015). Do pharmacists buy Bayer? Informed shoppers and the brand premium. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4). doi: 10.1093/qje/qjv024.
  22. Burdett, K., & Judd, K. L. (1983). Equilibrium price dispersion. Econometrica, 51(4), 955–969. doi: 10.2307/1912045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carlin, B. I. (2009). Strategic price complexity in retail financial markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 91(3), 278–287. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chater, N., Huck, S., & Inderst, R. (2010). Consumer decision-making in retail investment services: A behavioural economics perspective. Final report to the European Commission/SANCO. Accessed from the European Commission website at on December 17, 2014.
  25. Chioveanu, I., & Zhou, J. (2013). Price competition with consumer confusion. Management Science, 59(11), 2450–2469. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. C. (2010). \(\$100\) bills on the sidewalk: Suboptimal investment in 401(k) plans. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(3), 748–763. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., & Metrick, A. (2009). Reinforcement learning and savings behavior. The Journal of Finance, 64(6), 2515–2534. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01509.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Clerides, S. & Courty, P. (2014). Sales, quantity surcharge, and consumer inattention. Review of Economics and Statistics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  29. Competition & Markets Authority (2014). Personal current accounts, market study update. Accessed at on January 12, 2015.
  30. Crawford, G. S., Tosini, N., & Waehrer, K. (2011). The impact of ‘rollover’ contracts on switching costs in the UK voice market: Evidence from disaggregate customer billing data. Accessed from SSRN at on April 13, 2015.
  31. Decarolis, F. (2015). Medicare Part D: Are insurers gaming the low income subsidy design? The American Economic Review, 4(105), 1547–1580. doi: 10.1257/aer.20130903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315–372. doi: 10.1257/jel.47.2.315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Department of Energy & Climate Change (2014). Implementing proposals to amend domestic energy supply licence conditions-requiring provision of key energy data in a machine readable format. Accessed at on April 30, 2015.
  34. Department of Energy & Climate Change, & Davey, E. (2014). QR codes on energy bills put consumers in control. Press release, accessed at on December 14, 2014.
  35. Diamond, P. A. (1971). A model of price adjustment. Journal of Economic Theory, 3(2), 156–168. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(71)90013-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dranove, D., Kessler, D., McClellan, M., & Satterthwaite, M. (2003). Is more information better? The effects of report cards on health care providers. Journal of Political Economy, 111(3), 555–588. doi: 10.1086/374180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Duarte, F., & Hastings, J. S. (2012). Fettered consumers and sophisticated firms: Evidence from Mexico’s privatized social security market. NBER working paper no. 18582. Accessed at on April 30, 2015.
  38. Dubé, J.-P., Hitsch, G. J., & Rossi, P. E. (2009). Do switching costs make markets less competitive? Journal of Marketing Research, 46(4), 435–445. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.46.4.435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dubé, J.-P., Hitsch, G. J., & Rossi, P. E. (2010). State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. The RAND Journal of Economics, 41(3), 417–445. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00106.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Eiselt, H. A., Laporte, G., & Thisse, J.-F. (1993). Competitive location models: A framework and bibliography. Transportation Science, 27(1), 44–54. doi: 10.1287/trsc.27.1.44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Eliaz, K., & Spiegler, R. (2011a). Consideration sets and competitive marketing. The Review of Economic Studies, 78(1), 235–262. doi: 10.1093/restud/rdq016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Eliaz, K., & Spiegler, R. (2011b). On the strategic use of attention grabbers. Theoretical Economics, 6(1), 127–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ellison, G., & Ellison, S. F. (2009). Search, obfuscation, and price elasticities on the internet. Econometrica, 77(2), 427–452. doi: 10.3982/ECTA5708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ellison, G., & Wolitzky, A. (2012). A search cost model of obfuscation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 43(3), 417–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2012.00180.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ericson, K. M. M. (2014a). Consumer inertia and firm pricing in the Medicare Part D prescription drug insurance exchange. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(1), 38–64. doi: 10.1257/pol.6.1.38.Google Scholar
  46. Ericson, K. M. M. (2014b). On the interaction of memory and procrastination: Implications for reminders. NBER working paper no. 20381. Accessed at on December 11, 2014.
  47. Ericson, K. M. M. (2014c). When consumers do not make an active decision: Dynamic default rules and their equilibrium effects. NBER working paper no. 20127. Accessed at on December 11, 2014.
  48. Ericson, K. M. M., & Fuster, A. (2011). Expectations as endowments: Evidence on reference-dependent preferences from exchange and valuation experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1879–1907. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Farrell, J., & Klemperer, P. (2007). Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. In M. Armstrong & R. H. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (Vol. 3, chapter 31, pp. 1967–2072). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  50. Federal Reserve Board (2010). 12 crf part 226; regulation z; docket no. r-1366; truth in lending. Federal Register, 75(185), 58509–58538. (Rules and regulations).Google Scholar
  51. Gabaix, X., & Laibson, D. (2006). Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 505–540. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gabaix, X., Laibson, D., Li, D., Li, H., Resnick, S., & de Vries, C. G. (2013). The impact of competition on prices with numerous firms. Accessed from on August 3, 2015.
  53. Gaudeul, A., & Sugden, R. (2012). Spurious complexity and common standards in markets for consumer goods. Economica, 79(314), 209–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2011.00895.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Goettler, R. L., & Clay, K. B. (2011). Tariff choice with consumer learning and switching costs. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(4), 633–652. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.48.4.633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Grubb, M. D. (2009). Selling to overconfident consumers. American Economic Review, 99(5), 1770–1807. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.5.1770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Grubb, M. D. (2015a). Behavioral consumers in industrial organization: An overview. Review of Industrial Organization, 47(3), 247–258. doi: 10.1007/s11151-015-9477-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Grubb, M. D. (2015b). Consumer inattention and bill-shock regulation. The Review of Economic Studies, 82(1), 219–257. doi: 10.1093/restud/rdu024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Grubb, M. D. (2015c). Overconfident consumers in the marketplace. Accessed from on April 1, 2015.
  59. Grubb, M. D., & Osborne, M. (2015). Cellular service demand: Biased beliefs, learning, and bill shock. American Economic Review, 105(1), 234–271. doi: 10.1257/aer.20120283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Gu, Y., & Wenzel, T. (2014). Strategic obfuscation and consumer protection policy. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 62(4), 632–660. doi: 10.1111/joie.12060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Haan, M. A., & Moraga-González, J. L. (2011). Advertising for attention in a consumer search model. The Economic Journal, 121(552), 552–579. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02423.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Handel, B. R. (2013). Adverse selection and inertia in health insurance markets: When nudging hurts. American Economic Review, 103(7), 2643–2682. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.7.2643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Handel, B. R. (2014). Personal correspondence.Google Scholar
  64. Handel, B. R., & Kolstad, J. T. (2015). Health insurance for “humans”: Information frictions, plan choice, and consumer welfare. American Economic Review, 105(8), 2449–2500. doi: 10.1257/aer.20131126.
  65. Harding, M., & Lamarche, C. (2015). Empowering consumers through smart technology: Experimental evidence on the consequences of time-of-use electricity pricing. Paper presented at the 2015 annual meeting of the Allied Social Science Associations, Boston.Google Scholar
  66. Hastings, J. S., Hortaçsu, A., & Syverson, C. (2013). Advertising and competition in privatized social security: The case of Mexico. NBER working paper no. 18881. Accessed at on April 30, 2015.
  67. Hastings, J. S., & Tejeda-Ashton, L. (2008). Financial literacy, information, and demand elasticity: Survey and experimental evidence from Mexico. NBER working paper no. 14538. Accessed at on April 30, 2015.
  68. Ho, K., Hogan, J., & Scott Morton, F. M. (2015). The impact of consumer inattention on insurer pricing in the Medicare Part D program. NBER working paper no. 21028. Accessed at on April 30, 2015.
  69. Holman, J., & Zaidi, F. (2010). The economics of prospective memory. Accessed from SSRN at on May 1, 2015.
  70. Honka, E. (2014). Quantifying search and switching costs in the US auto insurance industry. The RAND Journal of Economics, 45(4), 847–884. doi: 10.1111/1756-2171.12073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hortaçsu, A., Madanizadeh, S. A., & Puller, S. L. (2015). Power to choose? An analysis of consumer inertia in the residential electricity market. Accessed from on April 13, 2015.
  72. Hortaçsu, A., & Syverson, C. (2004). Product differentiation, search costs, and competition in the mutual fund industry: A case study of S&P 500 index funds. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 403–456. doi: 10.1162/0033553041382184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Hung, A. A., Clancy, N., Dominitz, J., Talley, E., Berrebi, C., & Suvankulov, F. (2008). Investor and Industry Perspecitves on Investment Advisers and Broker-Dealers. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. RAND Institute for Civil Justice Technical Report. Accessed at on December 17, 2014.
  74. Inderst, R., & Ottaviani, M. (2012a). Financial advice. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(2), 494–512. doi: 10.1257/jel.50.2.494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Inderst, R., & Ottaviani, M. (2012b). How (not) to pay for advice: A framework for consumer financial protection. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(2), 393–411. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Iyengar, S. S., & Kamenica, E. (2010). Choice proliferation, simplicity seeking, and asset allocation. Journal of Public Economics, 94(7), 530–539. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Jin, G. Z., & Leslie, P. (2003). The effect of information on product quality: Evidence from restaurant hygiene grade cards. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 409–451. doi: 10.1162/003355303321675428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Kaiser Family Foundation (2013). Summary of the Affordable Care Act. Accessed at on April 17, 2015.
  79. Kalaycı, K., & Potters, J. (2011). Buyer confusion and market prices. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29(1), 14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Kamenica, E., Mullainathan, S., & Thaler, R. (2011). Helping consumers know themselves. American Economic Review, 101(3), 417–422. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.3.417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kiss, A. (2014). Salience and switching. Accessed from on March 9, 2015.
  82. Kőszegi, B., & Szeidl, A. (2013). A model of focusing in economic choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), 53–104. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjs049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lee, J., & Hogarth, J. M. (2000). Consumer information search for home mortgages: Who, what, how much, and what else? Financial Services Review, 9(3), 277–293. doi: 10.1016/S1057-0810(01)00071-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  85. Luco, F. (2014). Distinguishing sources of inertia in a defined-contribution pension system. Accessed from on April 13, 2015.
  86. Macro International Inc. (2008). Summary of findings: Consumer testing of mortgage broker disclosures. Submitted to Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Accessed at on November 26, 2014.
  87. Madeira, T. (2015). The cost of removing deadlines: Evidence from Medicare Part D. Accessed at on April 30, 2015.
  88. Madrian, B. C., & Shea, D. F. (2001). The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1149–1187. doi: 10.1162/003355301753265543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Matějka, F., & McKay, A. (2012). Simple market equilibria with rationally inattentive consumers. American Economic Review, 102(3), 24–29. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.3.24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Matějka, F., & McKay, A. (2015). Rational inattention to discrete choices: A new foundation for the multinomial logit model. American Economic Review, 1(105), 272–298. doi: 10.1257/aer.20130047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Miravete, E. J. (2013). Competition and the use of foggy pricing. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 5(1), 194–216. doi: 10.1257/mic.5.1.194.Google Scholar
  92. Morwitz, V., Greenleaf, E., Shalev, E., & Johnson, E. J. (2013). The price does not include additional taxes, fees, and surcharges: A review of research on partitioned pricing. Accessed from SSRN at on May 1, 2015.
  93. Mullainathan, S., Noeth, M.,&Schoar, A. (2012). The market for financial advice: An audit study. NBER working paper no. 17929. Accessed at on April 30, 2015.
  94. O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (1999). Doing it now or later. American Economic Review, 89(1), 103–124. doi: 10.1257/aer.89.1.103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Office of Fair Trading. (2010). The impact of price frames on consumer decision making. Commissioned by the Office of Fair Trading from London Economics in association with Steffan Huck and Brian Walace. Accessed at on May 1, 2015.
  96. Office of Gas and Electricity Markets. (2014). A simpler, clearer, and fairer energy market for consumers. UK Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, Factsheet 124. Accessed at on January 7, 2015.
  97. Ok, E. A., Ortoleva, P., & Riella, G. (2011). Theory of product differentiation in the presence of the attraction effect. Accessed from on May 1, 2015.
  98. Osborne, M. (2011). Consumer learning, switching costs and heterogeneity: A structural examination. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 9(1), 25–70. doi: 10.1007/s11129-010-9092-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Park, M. (2011). The economic impact of wireless number portability. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 59(4), 714–745. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2011.00471.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Piccione, M., & Spiegler, R. (2012). Price competition under limited comparability. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 97–135. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Rabin, M. (2002). Inference by believers in the law of small numbers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 775–816. doi: 10.1162/003355302760193896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2010). Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 409–425. doi: 10.1086/651235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Shelanski, H. A., Farrell, J., Hanner, D., Metcalf, C. J., Sullivan, M. W., & Wendling, B. W. (2012). Economics at the FTC: Drug and PBM mergers and drip pricing. Review of Industrial Organization, 41(4), 303–319. doi: 10.1007/s11151-012-9360-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Shi, M., Chiang, J., & Rhee, B.-D. (2006). Price competition with reduced consumer switching costs: The case of wireless number portability in the cellular phone industry. Management Science, 52(1), 27–38. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Shilony, Y. (1977). Mixed pricing in oligopoly. Journal of Economic Theory, 14(2), 373–388. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(77)90137-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Shum, M. (2004). Does advertising overcome brand loyalty? Evidence from the breakfast-cereals market. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 13(2), 241–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2004.00010.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Sims, C. A. (2003). Implications of rational inattention. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(3), 665–690. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3932(03)00029-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Sitzia, S., Zheng, J., & Zizzo, D. J. (2014). Inattentive consumers in markets for services. Theory and Decision. doi: 10.1007/s11238-014-9466-8.
  109. Spiegler, R. (2006a). Competition over agents with boundedly rational expectations. Theoretical Economics, 1(2), 207–231.Google Scholar
  110. Spiegler, R. (2006b). The market for quacks. The Review of Economic Studies, 73(4), 1113–1131. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2006.00410.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Spiegler, R. (2011). Bounded rationality and industrial organization. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Spiegler, R. (2014). Competitive framing. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6(3), 35–58. doi: 10.1257/mic.6.3.35.Google Scholar
  113. Spiegler, R. (2015). Choice complexity and market competition. Annual Review of Economics. (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  114. Stahl, D. O. (1989). Oligopolistic pricing with sequential consumer search. The American Economic Review, 79(4), 700–712.Google Scholar
  115. Stango, V. (2002). Pricing with consumer switching costs: Evidence from the credit card market. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(4), 475–492. doi: 10.1111/1467-6451.00187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Stoughton, N. M., Wu, Y., & Zechner, J. (2011). Intermediated investment management. The Journal of Finance, 66(3), 947–980. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01656.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Sudhir, K., & Yang, N. (2014). Exploiting the choice-consumption mismatch: A new approach to disentangle state dependence and heterogeneity. Accessed from SSRN at on April 13, 2015.
  118. Sullivan, M. W. (1998). How brand names affect the demand for twin automobiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 154–165. doi: 10.2307/3151844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  120. Thomas, K. (2012). An increase in scrutiny for generics. The New York Times. Accessed at on November 22, 2014.
  121. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105. doi: 10.1037/h0031322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business, 59(4), S251–S278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Varian, H. R. (1980). A model of sales. The American Economic Review, 70(4), 651–659.Google Scholar
  124. Viard, V. B. (2007). Do switching costs make markets more or less competitive? The case of 800-number portability. The RAND Journal of Economics, 38(1), 146–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2007.tb00049.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Wilson, C. M. (2010). Ordered search and equilibrium obfuscation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(5), 496–506. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2009.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Wilson, C. M. (2012). Market frictions: A unified model of search costs and switching costs. European Economic Review, 56(6), 1070–1086. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Wilson, C. M., & Waddams Price, C. (2010). Do consumers switch to the best supplier? Oxford Economic Papers, 62(4), 647–668. doi: 10.1093/oep/gpq006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Woodward, S. E., & Hall, R. E. (2012). Diagnosing consumer confusion and sub-optimal shopping effort: Theory and mortgage-market evidence. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3249–3276. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.7.3249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Boston CollegeChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations