Behavioral Economics and U.S. Antitrust Policy
- 974 Downloads
Modern day antitrust policy is grounded firmly in neoclassical economics. It is important, however, to test whether the modelling assumptions accord with the facts. It is also important to assess whether behavior that deviates from the conventional assumptions is systematic and persistent. If the relevant facts suggest that consumers or firms might behave in ways that depart from conventional assumptions, then private parties, government agencies and the courts should consider alternate economic models that account appropriately for the observed behavior.
KeywordsAntitrust Behavioral economics Competition policy Mergers
- Armstrong, M., & Huck, S. (2010). Behavioral economics as applied to firms: A primer. Competition Policy International, 6(1), 2–45.Google Scholar
- Bailey, E. (2010). Behavioral economics: Implications for antitrust practitioners. Antitrust Source, 9(5), 1–7.Google Scholar
- Bailey, E. (2011). Challenging the assumptions of modern economics in merger analysis. NERA economic consulting antitrust insights. Retrieved from http://www.nera.com/publications/newsletters-briefs/antitrust-insights.html.
- Bamberger, G., & Carlton, D. (1999). Antitrust and higher education: MIT financial aid (1993). In J. Kwoka & L. White (Eds.), The antitrust revolution: Economics, competition and policy (pp. 264–285). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. In G. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of finance (pp. 1053–1128). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- Huck, S., & Zhou, J. (2011). Consumer behavioural biases in competition: A survey. Report commissioned by the U.K. Office of fair trading. Retrieved from http://londoneconomics.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Consumer-behavioural-biases-in-competition-OFT1.pdf.
- Kószegi, R., & Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-based preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1133–1165.Google Scholar
- Roundtable Interview with Joseph Farrell and Carl Shapiro. (2010). The antitrust source, 9(3), 1–9.Google Scholar
- Salop, S. (2006). Exclusionary conduct, effect on consumers, and the flawed profit-sacrifice standard. Antitrust Law Journal, 73, 311–374.Google Scholar
- Sloan, F. (2000). Not for profit ownership and hospital behavior. In A. J. Culyer & J. P. Newhouse (Eds.), Handbook of health economics (Vol. 1, pp. 1141–1174). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- Viscusi, K., Vernon, J., & Harrington, J. (2005). Economics of regulation and antitrust. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Werden, G. (2006). The ‘no economic sense’ test for exclusionary conduct. Journal of Corporation Law., 31, 293–305.Google Scholar