Merger Control Policy Under China’s Anti-Monopoly Law
- 757 Downloads
China’s merger policy and enforcement approaches since its Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) took effect in August 2008 are by and large based on the same conceptual framework that is employed in advanced economies. While China has shown a very fast learning capability in conducting competition analysis, further capacity building in China is crucial. There is no clear evidence of industrial policy considerations being at the forefront in the eight published decisions by the Ministry of Commerce to date, except for its very early decisions. We propose a competition-neutral principle, which requires that a competition test be conducted before, and independently from, any consideration of industrial policy and argue that industrial policy matters only for competition-neutral mergers. On a more technical level, if China adopts the total welfare standard, then its treatment of efficiencies and the meaning of sufficiency of entry post merger should be modified accordingly from the US/EU consumer-oriented model.
KeywordsMerger control China’s Anti-Monopoly Law Theory of harm Welfare standard Industrial policy
JEL ClassificationL4 L43 L44
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cramer, N. (2010). Waiting for the other shoe: Merger review under the PRC Anti Monopoly Law. Working paper.Google Scholar
- Fallon J. (2005) ACCC’s authorisation of decisions: Interpretation of public interest. Agenda 12(4): 335–350Google Scholar
- Fels, A. (2012). China’s Anti-Monopoly Law 2008: An overview. Rev Ind Organ doi: 10.1007/s11151-012-9342-y.
- James, C. A. (2002). Giant steps, remarks on the occasion of the twentieth anniversary of the 1982 merger guidelines. Available at http://www.justice.gov/atr/hmerger/11253.pdf.
- Lin, P. (2005). Competition policy in China: Interactions with industrial and FDI policies. In S. Evernett & D. Brooks (Eds.), Competition policy and development in east Asia (pp. 71–106). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lin, P. (2009a). Balancing competition policy and industrial policy under China’s AML, presentation at the 5th summer workshop on industrial organization and management strategy. Qinghua University, Beijing.Google Scholar
- Lin, P. (2009b). The unilateral effects of horizontal mergers (in Chinese). MOFCOM Internal Publication.Google Scholar
- Lin. P. (2009c). The coordinated effects of horizontal mergers (in Chinese). MOFCOM Internal Publication.Google Scholar
- Lin, P. (2010). Assessment of the unilateral effects and coordinated effects of mergers in the US and the EU and implications for China. MOFCOM Internal Publication.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Commerce: (2007) Anti-Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China: Interpretations and applications. The Law Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- Shan, P., Tan, G., Wilkie, S.J., & Williams, M.A. (2012). China’s Anti-Monopoly Law: What is the welfare standard? Rev Ind Organ. doi: 10.1007/s11151-012-9349-5.
- Sun H., Zhao J. (2011) China Introduces National Security Review for Foreign Investments. Norton Rose, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Wang X. Y. (2008) On the Anti-Monopoly Law, (in Chinese). Social Sciences Academic Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- Williamson O. (1968) Economies as an antitrust defense: The welfare tradeoffs. American Economic Review 58: 407–426Google Scholar
- Wu, C. Q., & Liu, Z. C. (2012). A tiger without teeth? regulation of administrative monopoly under China’s Anti-Monopoly Law. Rev Ind Organ. doi: 10.1007/s11151-012-9351-y.
- Yin, Y. L. (2010). China’s merger control legislation and enforcement. Presentation at the Asian competition forum conference. Available at http://www.asiancompetitionforum.org/download/20101207_ACF_ppt/2-02%2020101206present_final.pdf.
- Zhang, X. Z. (2011). Oracle and sun merger: The economic analysis. Power-point presentation at Dalian international conference on industrial organization. Dalian.Google Scholar