Does Big Drive Out Small?
- 1.4k Downloads
This paper measures the impact of the entry of large supermarkets on incumbents of various sizes. Contrary to the conventional notion that big stores drive small rivals out of the market, data from Tokyo in the 1990s show that large supermarkets’ entry induces the exit of existing large and medium-size competitors, but improves the survival rate of small supermarkets. These findings highlight the role of store size as an important dimension of product differentiation. Size-based entry regulations would appear to protect big incumbents, at the expense of small incumbents and potential entrants.
KeywordsDeregulation Entry and exit Product differentiation Retail
JEL ClassificationL11 L13 L51 L81
I thank Jinyong Hahn, Hidehiko Ichimura, Toshiaki Iizuka, Edward Leamer, Rosa Matzkin, Hiroshi Ohashi, Connan Snider, Raphael Thomadsen, and seminar participants at the University of Tokyo, the 2007 Japanese Economic Association Annual Spring Meeting at Osaka Gakuin University, and UCLA, for invaluable suggestions. I am grateful to the editor, Lawrence White, and the two anonymous referees, for thoughtful comments. I thank Evan Gill, Matthew Khalil Hill, and Maki Komatsu for editorial assistance, Saneaki Obata for industry expertise, and my local supermarkets CSN (small) and Life Extra (medium) for inspiration. Financial support from the Ito Foundation and the Nozawa Fellowship are gratefully acknowledged.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Anderson S. P., de Palma A., Thisse J.-F. (1992) Discrete choice theory of product differentiation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Arai Y. (1996) Seikatsu-ken no keikaku. In: Arai Y., Okamoto K., Kamiya H., Kawaguchi T. (eds) Toshi no kuukan to jikan: Seikatsu-katsudou no jikan-chirigaku. Kokonshoin, Tokyo, pp 73–80Google Scholar
- Japan Fair Trade Commission. (2005). Marubeni Kabushikigaisha niyoru Kabushikigaisha Daiei tou heno shusshi nitsuite. Retrieved September 23, 2009, from http://www.jftc.go.jp/ma/jirei2/H17jirei12-02.html.
- Kawaguchi T. (1996) Seikatsu no jikuukan to shogyo katsudou. In: Arai Y., Okamoto K., Kamiya H., Kawaguchi T. (eds) Toshi no kuukan to jikan: Seikatsu-katsudou no jikan-chirigaku. Kokonshoin, Tokyo, pp 157–176Google Scholar
- Lewis W. W. (2004) The power of productivity: Wealth, poverty, and the threat to global stability. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
- Masuda E. (2002) Tokyo-ken Korekara Nobiru Machi [Towns with High Growth Potential in Greater Tokyo]. Kodansha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Minakata T. (2004) Nihon no Kouri-gyo to Ryutsu-seisaku. Chuo-Keizai-Sha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Neven D., Thisse J.-F. (1990) On quality and variety competition. In: Gabszewicz J. J., Richard J.-F., Wolsey L. (eds) Economic decision-making: Games, econometrics and optimisation. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 175–199Google Scholar
- Shogyokai. (1990 & 1995). Japan Supermarket Directory [Nihon Supermarket Meikan]. Tokyo: Shogyokai.Google Scholar
- Sutton J. (1991) Sunk costs and market structure: Price competition, advertising, and the evolution of concentration. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Toyokeizai: (1995) Metropolitan commercial map 1995 [Shutoken Shogyochi Map 1995]. Toyokeizai, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Wal-Mart Watch. (2005). Annual Report 2005: Low Price at What Cost? Retrieved from http://walmartwatch.com/img/sitestream/pdf/2005-annual-report.pdf.
- Zhu, T., Singh, V. & Dukes, A. (2006). Local competition and impact of entry by a discount retailer. Working Paper, University of Toronto.Google Scholar