Review of Industrial Organization

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 5–44 | Cite as

Theory of the Perfect Game: Competitive Balance in Monopoly Sports Leagues



Based on the limiting assumption that sports owners are profit maximizers the invariance proposition holds that revenue sharing has no impact on competitive balance in sports leagues. If owners are win-maximizing sportsmen instead, then revenue sharing can lead to increased competitive balance and higher payrolls. Evidence of the sportsman effect is provided by erosion of monopsonistic exploitation in the four major American sports leagues where players now share about 60% of revenues. Monopsony power erosion forces sports-league cartels to exploit statutory monopoly power in monster deals for media rights fees and public venue subsidies. New evidence on competitive balance suggests that revenue sharing leads to increased balance with or without team salary caps. Optimum competitive balance is an empirical question, and the answer lies between random competition of the NFL and deterministic dynasties of the NBA.


Professional sports leagues Competitive balance 

JEL Classification



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. El Hodiri M., Quirk J. (1971) An economic model of a professional sports league. Journal of Political Economy, 79: 1302–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fort R., Quirk J. (1995) Cross-subsidization, incentives, and outcomes in professional team sports leagues. Journal of Economic Literature, 33(3): 1265–1299Google Scholar
  3. Kesenne S. (1996) League management in professional team sports with win maximizing clubs. European Journal for Sports Management, 2: 14–22Google Scholar
  4. Kesenne S. (2000) The impact of salary caps in professional team sports. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 47(4): 422–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Quirk J., El Hodiri M. (1974) The economic theory of a professional sports league. In: Noll R.(eds) Government and the Sports Business.. Brookings, Washington DC, pp 33–80Google Scholar
  6. Quirk J., Fort R. (1992) Pay Dirt: The Business of Professional Team Sports. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  7. Rottenberg S. (1956) The baseball player’s labor market. Journal of Political Economy, 64: 242–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sloane P. (1971) The economics of professional football: The football club as a utility maximizer. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 7(2): 121–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Szymanski S. (2003) The economic design of sporting contests. Journal of Economic Literature, 41: 1137–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Szymanski S. (2004) Professional team sports are only a game: Walrasian fixed-supply conjecture model, contest nash equilibrium and the invariance principle. Journal of Sports Economics, 5: 111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Szymanski S., Kesenne S. (2004) Competitive balance and gate revenue sharing in team sports. Journal of Industrial Economics, 52(1): 165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vrooman J. (1995) General theory of professional sports leagues. Southern Economic Journal, 61(4): 971–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vrooman J. (1996) The baseball players labor market reconsidered. Southern Economic Journal, 63(2): 339–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vrooman J. (1997a) Unified theory of capital and labor markets in major league baseball. Southern Economic Journal, 63(3): 594–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vrooman J. (1997b) Franchise free agency in professional sports leagues. Southern Economic Journal, 64(1): 191–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vrooman J. (2000) The economics of American sports leagues. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 47(4): 594–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vrooman J. (2007) Theory of the beautiful game: The unification of European football. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 54(3): 314–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations