Advertisement

Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 871–900 | Cite as

Educational attainment and maternity in Spain: not only “when” but also “how”

  • María A. Davia
  • Nuria Legazpe
Article

Abstract

This paper describes how women with different human capital endowments behave differently with regard to the decision to bear their first child and disentangles the overall effects of education on the timing of the birth of the first child through a set of intervening variables. To do so, a decomposition technique that enables distinction between direct and indirect effects in logistic regressions is deployed. Education drives different fertility behavior patterns and delays fertility through several mechanisms: attachment to the labor market, non-traditional values, and the characteristics of the partner and the partnership. Nevertheless, the ability of the mechanisms explored in this study to explain the link between education and fertility timing is rather limited, and a large part of this relationship remains unexplained. In addition, we find evidence of differences across educational groups in the way women’s decisions to have their first child respond to several explanatory factors, which points at a structural change in the decision taking amongst women with different educational endowments.

Keywords

Fertility Human capital Intervening variables Duration analysis Decomposition 

JEL Classification

J13 J16 J24 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. Maarten Buis for his help and advice on the application of his STATA program ldecomp while Maria A. Davia was visiting WZB (Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung), which hospitality is greatly acknowledged. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. Adserà, A. (2006). An economic analysis of the gap between desired and actual fertility: The case of Spain. Review of Economics of the Household, 4(1), 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adserà, A. (2004). Changing fertility rates in developed countries. The impact of labor market institutions. Journal of Population Economics, 17(1), 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahn, N., & Mira, P. (2001). Job bust, baby bust?: Evidence from Spain. Journal of Population Economics, 14(3), 505–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alba, A., Álvarez-Llorente, G., & Carrasco, R. (2009). On the estimation of the effect of labour participation on fertility. Spanish Economic Review, 11(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Álvarez-Llorente, G. (2002). Decisiones de Fecundidad y Participación Laboral de la Mujer en España. Investigaciones Económicas, 26(1), 187–218.Google Scholar
  6. Amuedo-Dorantes, C., & Kimmel, J. (2005). The motherhood wage gap for women in the United States: The importance of college and fertility delay. Review of Economics of the Household, 3(1), 17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baizán, P., Aassve, A., & Billari, F. C. (2003). Cohabitation, marriage, and first birth: The interrelationship of family formation events in Spain. European Journal of Population, 19(2), 147–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker, G. S. (1960). An Economic Analysis of Fertility. In Universities National Bureau Committee for Economic Research (Ed.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209–231). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Becker, G. D. (1991). A Treatise on the family (Enlarged ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Blackburn, M. L., Bloom, D. E., & Neumark, D. (1993). Fertility timing, wages and human capital. Journal of Population Economics, 6(1), 1–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bloemen, H., & Kalwij, A. S. (2001). Female labor market transitions and the timing of births: A simultaneous analysis of the effects of schooling. Labour Economics, 8(5), 593–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brañas-Garza, P., & Neuman, S. (2007). Parental religiosity and daughter’s fertility: The case of Catholics in Southern Europe. Review of Economics of the Household, 5(3), 305–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buis, M. L. (2010). Direct and indirect effects in a logit model. The Stata Journal, 10(1), 11–29.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Castro-Martín, T. (1992). Delayed childbearing in contemporary Spain: Trends and differentials. European Journal of Population, 8(3), 217–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. De La Rica, S., & Ferrero, M. D. (2003). The effect of fertility on labour force participation: The Spanish evidence. Spanish Economic Review, 5(2), 153–172.Google Scholar
  16. De la Rica, S., & Iza, A. (2005). Career planning in Spain: Do fixed-term contracts delay marriage and parenthood? Review of Economics of the Household, 3(1), 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Wit, M. L., & Ravanera, Z. R. (1998). The changing impact of women’s educational attainment and employment on the timing of births in Canada. Canadian Studies in Population, 25(1), 45–67.Google Scholar
  18. Del Boca, D., Pascua, S., & Pronzato, C. (2005). Fertility and employment in Italy, France and the UK. Labour, 19(S1), 51–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Del Boca, D., & Sauer, R. M. (2009). Life cycle employment and fertility across institutional environments. European Economic Review, 53(3), 274–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., Jackson, M., Yaish, M., & Cox, D. R. (2005). On class differentials in educational attainment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 102(27), 9730–9733.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernández-Kranz, D., Lacuesta, A., & Rodríguez-Planas, N. (2013). The motherhood earnings dip: Evidence from administrative records. Journal of Human Resources, 48(1), 169–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Francesconi, M. (2002). A joint dynamic model of fertility and work of married women. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(2), 336–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldstein, J. R., Sobotka, T., & Jasilioniene, A. (2009). The end of lowest-low fertility?. Population and Development Review, 35(4), 663–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gustafsson, S. (2005). Having kids later. Economic analyses for industrialized countries. Review of Economics of the Household, 3(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gustafsson, S., & Worku, S. (2005). Assortative mating by education and postponement of couple formation and first birth in Britain and Sweden. Review of Economics of the Household, 3(1), 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gutiérrez-Domènech, M. (2008). The impact of the labour market on the timing of marriage and births in Spain. Journal of Population Economics, 21(1), 83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haan, P., & Wrohlich, K. (2011). Can child care policy encourage employment and fertility? Evidence from a structural model. Labour Economics, 18(4), 498–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hakim, C. (2003). A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: preference theory. Population and Development Review, 29(3), 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Herrarte, A., Moral-Carcedo, J., & Sáez, F. (2012). The impact of childbirth on Spanish women’s decisions to leave the labor market. Review of Economics of the Household, 10(3), 441–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hotchkiss, J. L., Pitts, M. M., & Walker, M. B. (2011). Labor force exit decisions of new mothers. Review of Economics of the Household, 9(3), 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jenkins, S. P. (1995). Easy estimation methods for discrete-time duration models. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57(1), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Kohler, H., Billari, F., & Ortega, J. (2002). The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review, 28(4), 641–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kravdal, Ø., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2008). Changing relationships between education and fertility: A study of women and men born 1940 to 1964. American Sociological Review, 73(5), 854–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kreyenfeld, M. (2010). Uncertainties in female employment careers and the postponement of parenthood in Germany. European Sociological Review, 26(3), 51–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Long, J. S. (2009). Group comparisons in logit and probit using predicted probabilities. Working paper draft 2009-06-25. Retrieved from: http://www.indiana.edu/~jslsoc/research_groupdif.htm.
  37. Marcenaro-Gutiérrez, O., & Navarro, L. (2005). Nueva evidencia sobre el rendimiento del capital humano en España. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 13(37), 69–88.Google Scholar
  38. Martín-García, T., & Baizán, P. (2006). The impact of the type of education and of educational enrolment on first births. European Sociological Review, 22(3), 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller, A. R. (2011). The effect of motherhood timing on career path. Journal of Population Economics, 24(3), 1071–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mills, M. R., Rindfuss, R., McDonald, P., & te Velde, E. (2011). Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Human Reproduction Update, 17(6), 848–860.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Moffit, R. A. (1984). Profiles of fertility, labor supply, and wages of married woman: A complete life-cycle model. Review of Economic Studies, 52(2), 765–799.Google Scholar
  42. Molina, J. A., & Montuenga, V. (2009). The motherhood wage penalty in Spain. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30(3), 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mulder, C. H. (2006). Home-ownership and family formation. Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 21(3), 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nicoletti, C., & Tanturri, M. L. (2008). Differences in delaying motherhood across European countries: Empirical evidence from the ECHP. European Journal of Population, 24(2), 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Donoghue, C., Meredith, D., & O’Shea, E. (2011). Postponing maternity in Ireland. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(1), 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pronzato, C. D. (2009). Return to work after childbirth: Does parental leave matter in Europe? Review of Economics of the Household, 7(4), 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sheran, M. (2007). The career and family choices of women: A dynamic analysis of labor force participation, schooling, marriage, and fertility decisions. Review of Economic Dynamics, 10(3), 367–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Suárez, M. J. (2013). Working mothers’ decisions on child care: The case of Spain. Review of Economics of the Household,. doi: 10.1007/s11150-013-9189-6.Google Scholar
  49. Van Bavel, J. (2010). Choice of study discipline and the postponement of motherhood in Europe: The impact of expected earnings. Gender Composition and Family Attitudes. Demography, 47(2), 439–458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang, L. (2011). The influence of cohabitation on male and female fertility. In Male fertility patterns and determinants. The Springer Series on Demographic methods and population analysis, 27 (Part 3), (pp. 143–176). Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y EmpresarialesUniversidad de Castilla – La ManchaAlbaceteSpain
  2. 2.Facultad de Ciencias Sociales - Edificio Gil de AlbornozUniversidad de Castilla – La ManchaCuencaSpain

Personalised recommendations