Advertisement

Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 309–312 | Cite as

Altruism in the household: in kind transfers in the context of kin selection

  • José Alberto Molina
Article

It is generally accepted that nature is, in essence, competitive. Nevertheless, the world is full of examples that demonstrate the opposite, cooperation. It is precisely this spirit of collaboration, this teamwork, that has allowed the emergence of increasingly complete forms of life. This special issue is about altruistic acts defined as behavior in which an individual assumes a cost so that others can obtain a benefit.

Darwin (1859) already realized that this altruistic behavior presented a problem for his theory of evolution by natural selection. How does one explain the existence of altruistic individuals when their conduct benefits others but entails a cost for them? The model that best explains how natural selection promotes altruistic conduct is based on kin selection: within a family nucleus altruism takes place among family members who share genes as descendants of common ancestors. This reasoning has been mathematically revealed through Hamilton’s rule, stating that altruism...

Keywords

Parental Altruism Parental Happiness Family Structure Transition Free School Lunch High Quality Manuscript 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am grateful for helpful comments from Shoshana Grossbard. This contribution has been benefited from the funding from the Spanish Ministry of Economics (Project ECO2012-34828).

References

  1. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise of the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the prevervation of favored races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  3. Edgeworth, F. (1881). Mathematical psychics: An essay of the application of mathematics to the moral sciences. London: C. Kegan Paul and Co.Google Scholar
  4. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Molina, J.A., Giménez-Nadal, J.I., Cuesta, J.A., García Lázaro, C., Moreno, Y., Sanchez, A. (2013). Gender differences in cooperation: experimental evidence on high school students. IZA DP Nº 7421.Google Scholar
  6. Mulder, M. G. (2007). Hamilton’s rule and kin competition: the Kipsigis case. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Oli, M. K. (2003). Hamilton goes empirical: estimation of inclusive fitness from life-history data. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological B, 270, 307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Smith, A. (1957). The theory of moral sentiments. Printed for A. Millar, in the Strand; and A. Kincaid and J. Bell, in Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  9. Waibel, M., Floreano, D., & Keller, L. (2011). A quantitative test of Hamilton’s rule for the evolution of altruism. PLoS Biology, 9(5), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. West, S. A., Murray, M. G., Machado, C. A., Griffin, A. S., & Herre, E. A. (2011). Testing Hamilton’s rule with competition between relatives. Nature, 409, 510–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Zaragoza and IZAZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations