Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 689–715 | Cite as

One male offspring preference: evidence from Vietnam using a split-population model



This paper examines sex preferences for children in Vietnam using the mother birth cohort from 1972 to 1993. We specify the full set for sex–birth order composition of existing children using a split-population model. The model relaxes the assumption in conventional hazard models that all mothers would eventually have another child. Our results indicate a preference in these families for one male offspring. In addition, we observe a mixed sex preference at the fourth birth order. We also establish that a one-square-meter increase in household living area, as a proxy for the increment in household wealth, is associated with a 0.997 times lower preference for a son for the second childbirth, but a 1.015 and 1.014 times higher preference for a son for the third and fourth childbirths, respectively. As long as two-child families dominate the population structure, these results suggest that the importance placed on economic reasons for a son preference will gradually weaken as economic development proceeds in Vietnam.


Son preference Sex composition Birth spacing Birth order Split-population model 

JEL Classification

J11 J12 J13 



The authors acknowledge the useful suggestions of Hisakazu Matsushige, Tsunehiro Ootsuki, and Charles Yuji Horioka of Osaka University, and participants at the Labor Economics Conference held in Awajishima, Japan, on September 4–6, 2011, and the Fall Meeting of the Japanese Economic Association held at Tsukuba University, Japan, on October 29–30, 2011. The authors would especially like to thank Shoshana Grossbard and three anonymous referees for valuable comments and suggestions made during the reviewing process. All remaining errors are ours.


  1. Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(1), 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-19, 716–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, G., Hank, K., Rønsen, M., & Vikat, A. (2006). Gendering family composition: Sex preferences for children and childbearing behavior in the Nordic countries. Demography, 43(2), 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basu, D., & De Jong, R. (2010). Son targeting fertility behavior: Some consequences and determinants. Demography, 47(2), 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, G. S., Duesenberry, J. S., & Okun, B. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In G. B. Roberts (Ed.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209–240). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), S279–S288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bélanger, D. (2002a). Sex selective abortions: short-term and long-term perspectives. Reproductive Health Matters, 10(19), 194–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bélanger, D. (2002b). Son preference in a rural village in North Vietnam. Studies in Family Planning, 33(4), 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buis, M. L. (2010). Stata tip 87: Interpretation of interactions in nonlinear models. Stata Journal, 10(2), 305–308.Google Scholar
  11. Buis, M. L. (2012). Stata tip 107: The baseline is now reported. Stata Journal, 12(1), 165–166.Google Scholar
  12. Chung, W., & Das Gupta, M. (2007). The decline of son preference in South Korea: The roles of development and public policy. Population and Development Review, 33(4), 757–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Das Gupta, M. (1987). Selective discrimination against female children in rural Punjab, India. Population and Development Review, 13(1), 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Das Gupta, M. (2005). Explaining Asia’s ‘missing women’: A new look at the data. Population and Development Review, 31(3), 529–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Das Gupta, M. (2006). Cultural versus biological factors in explaining Asia’s ‘missing women’: Response to Oster. Population and Development Review, 32(2), 328–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Das Gupta, M. (2008). Can biological factors like Hepatitis B explain the bulk of gender imbalance in China? A review of the evidence. World Bank Research Observer, 23(2), 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Das Gupta, M., Chung, W., & Shuzhuo, L. (2009). Evidence for an incipient decline in numbers of missing girls in China and India. Population and Development Review, 35(2), 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Das Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W., & Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India, and the Republic of Korea. Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 153–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edlund, L. (1999). Son preference, sex ratios, and marriage patterns. Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), 1275–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaudin, S. (2011). Son preference in Indian families: Absolute versus relative wealth effects. Demography, 48(1), 343–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO). (2010). Gross domestic product at constant 1994 prices by economic sector. Accessed December 14, 2012 from
  22. Goodkind, D. (1994). Abortion in Vietnam: Measurements, puzzles, and concerns. Studies in Family Planning, 25(6), 342–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gray, E., Evans, A., Anderson, J., & Kippen, R. (2010). Using split-population models to examine predictors of the probability and timing of parity progression. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 26(3), 275–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greene, W. (2010). Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models. Economics Letters, 107(2), 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haughton, J., & Haughton, D. (1995). Son preference in Vietnam. Studies in Family Planning, 26(6), 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haughton, D., & Haughton, J. (1996). Using a mixture model to detect son preference in Vietnam. Journal of Biosocial Science, 28(3), 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haughton, J., & Haughton, D. (1998). Are simple tests of son preference useful? An evaluation using data from Vietnam. Journal of Population Economics, 11(4), 495–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heckman, J., & Singer, B. (1984). A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica, 52(2), 271–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Honoré, B. E. (1990). Simple estimation of a duration model with unobserved heterogeneity. Econometrica, 58(2), 453–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kureishi, W., & Wakabayashi, M. (2011). Son preference in Japan. Journal of Population Economics, 24(3), 873–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambert, P. C. (2007). Modeling of the cure fraction in survival studies. Stata Journal, 7(3), 351–375.Google Scholar
  32. Larsen, U., Chung, W., & Das Gupta, M. (1998). Fertility and son preference in Korea. Population Studies, 52(3), 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, J. (2008). Sibling size and investment in children’s education: An Asian instrument. Journal of Population Economics, 21(4), 855–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maller, R., & Zhou, X. (1996). Survival analysis with long-term survivors. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Nickell, S. (1979). Estimating the probability of leaving unemployment. Econometrica, 47(5), 1249–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oster, E. (2005). Hepatitis B and the case of the missing women. Journal of Political Economy, 113(6), 1163–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oster, E., Chen, G., Yu, X., & Lin, W. (2010). Hepatitis B does not explain male-biased sex ratios in China. Economics Letters, 107(2), 142–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosenzweig, M. R., & Wolpin, K. I. (2000). Natural ‘natural experiments’ in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(4), 827–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmidt, P., & Witte, A. D. (1989). Predicting criminal recidivism using ‘split population’ survival time models. Journal of Econometrics, 40(1), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sen, A. (1990). More than 100 million women are missing. New York Review of Books. Accessed December 14, 2012 from
  41. United Nations (UN). (2007). World abortion policies 2007, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Accessed December 14, 2012 from
  42. United Nations (UN). (2011). World abortion policies 2011, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Accessed December 14, 2012 from
  43. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). (2009a). Vietnam population 2008. Accessed December 14, 2012 from
  44. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). (2009b). Recent change in the sex ratio at birth in Viet Nam. Accessed December 14, 2012 from
  45. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). (2010). Factsheet: Aging and elderly people in Vietnam. Accessed December 14, 2012 from
  46. Vu, L. (2009). Age at first marriage in Vietnam: Trends and determinants. Working paper. Accessed December 14, 2012 from
  47. World Bank. (2011a). Life expectancy at birth. Accessed December 14, 2012 from
  48. World Bank. (2011b). Population growth rate. Accessed December 14, 2012 from
  49. World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). Global health observatory data: Country summary statistics for Vietnam. Accessed December 14, 2012 from
  50. Yamaguchi, K. (1989). A formal theory for male-preferring stopping rules of childbearing: Sex differences in birth order and in the number of siblings. Demography, 26(3), 451–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yamaguchi, K., & Ferguson, L. R. (1995). The stopping and spacing of childbirths and their birth-history predictors: rational-choice theory and event-history analysis. American Sociological Review, 60(2), 272–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Osaka School of International Public PolicyOsaka UniversityToyonakaJapan

Personalised recommendations