Journal of Regulatory Economics

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 194–208 | Cite as

Did the introduction of a nodal market structure impact wholesale electricity prices in the Texas (ERCOT) market?

Original Article


Regression analysis suggests that zonal averages of locational marginal prices under the nodal market are about 2 % lower than the balancing energy prices that would occur under the previous zonal market structure in ERCOT. The estimates for the nodal market price effects are found after controlling for such factors as natural gas prices, total system load levels, non-dispatchable generation levels, the treatment of local congestion costs, and the treatment of the revenues received by the market from the auctioning of transmission rights. Our finding is limited to periods which are not characterized by price spikes in the wholesale market.


Electricity market restructuring Deregulation Locational marginal pricing ERCOT 

JEL Classification

L51 L11 L94 Q48 



The authors would like to thank Dan Jones of Potomac Economics for discussions during the course of this work. We also wish to thank two anonymous referees and providing exceptionally detailed and valuable comments on earlier drafts.


  1. Baldick, R. (2003). Shift factors in ERCOT congestion pricing. Technical report, March 2003. Presented at the Public Utility Commission of Texas.Google Scholar
  2. Baldick, R. (2012). Wind and energy markets: A case study of Texas. IEEE Systems Journal, 6(1), 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baughman, M. L., Siddiqi, S. N., & Zarnikau, J. (1997). Advanced pricing in electrical systems, part 1: Theory. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 12(1), 489–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cleary, M. (2011). Market benefits observed: The first six months. Accessed June 21, 2011, from
  5. Climate Policy Initiative. (2011). International experiences of nodal pricing implementation: Frequently asked questions. Berlin: Climate Policy Initiative.Google Scholar
  6. Foley, A. M., Gallachoir, B. P. O., Hur, J., Baldick, J., & McKeogh, E. J. (2010). A strategic review of electricity system models. Energy, 35(12), 4522–4530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Green, R. (2007). Nodal pricing of electricity: How much does it cost to get it wrong? Journal of Regulatory Economics, 31, 125–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hinsley, R. (2006). Memo to the ERCOT Board, Item 6, Market Redesign Report. Accessed April 11, 2006, from
  9. Huber, P. J. (1973). Robust regression: Asymptotics, conjectures and Monte Carlo. Annals of Statistics, 1, 799–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ma, X., Sun, D., & Cheung, K. (2003). Evolution toward standard market design. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 18(2), 460–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Petterson, M. (2011). Presentation to the ERCOT Board, Item 10a. Accessed January 18, 2011, from
  12. Rousseeuw, P. J., & Leroy, A. M. (1987). Robust regression and outlier detection. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rousseeuw, P. J., & Yohai, V. J. (1984). Robust regression by means of S estimators. In J. Franke, W. Hardle, & R. D. Martin (Eds.), Robust and nonlinear time series analysis (pp. 256–274). Lecture notes in statistics, 26. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Schweppe, F. C., Caramanis, M. C., Tabors, R. D., & Bohn, R. E. (1988). Spot pricing of electricity. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tabors Caramanis & Associates and KEMA Consulting. (2004, November). Cost–benefit assessment of the Texas nodal market.Google Scholar
  16. Woo, C. K., Horowitz, I., Horii, B., Orans, R., & Zarnikau, J. (2012). Blowing in the wind: Vanishing payoffs of a tolling agreement for natural-gas-fired generation of electricity in Texas. The Energy Journal, 33(1), 207–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Woo, C. K., Horowitz, I., Moore, J., & Pacheco, A. (2011a). The impact of wind generation on the electricity spot-market price level and variance: The Texas experience. Energy Policy, 39(7), 3939–3944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Woo, C. K., Zarnikau, J., Moore, J., & Horowitz, I. (2011b). Wind generation and zonal-market price divergence: Evidence from Texas. Energy Policy, 39, 3928–3938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yohai, V. J. (1987). High breakdown point and high efficiency robust estimates for regression. Annals of Statistics, 15, 642–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Frontier Associates LLCAustinUSA
  2. 2.LBJ School of Public Affairs and Division of StatisticsThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsHong Kong Baptist UniversityHong KongHong Kong
  4. 4.Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc.San FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations