Toward a combined merchant-regulatory mechanism for electricity transmission expansion
- 417 Downloads
Electricity transmission pricing and transmission grid expansion have received increasing attention in recent years. There are two disparate approaches to transmission investment: one employs the theory based on long-run financial rights (LTFTR) to transmission (merchant approach), while the other is based on the incentive-regulation hypothesis (regulatory approach). In this paper we consider the elements that could combine the merchant and regulatory approaches in a setting with price-taking electricity generators and loads. The monopoly transmission firm (Transco) is regulated through benchmark or price regulation to provide long-term investment incentives. The two-part tariff approach used can be analyzed analytically only for well-behaved cost and demand functions. We explore a series of simplified transmission grids to argue that in a variety of circumstances those functions could have reasonable economic properties. The results suggest directions for further research to explore the properties of the cost functions and implications for design of practical incentive mechanisms and the integration with merchant investment in organized markets with LTFTRs.
KeywordsElectricity transmission Financial transmission rights Incentive regulation Loop-flow problem
JEL ClassificationD24 L51 L94
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Awad, M., Broad, S., Casey, K. E., Chen, J., Geevarghese, A. S., Miller, et al. (2004). The California ISO transmission economic assessment methodology. Paper presented at the First Carnegie-Mellon Conference on Electricity, Pittsburgh, PA. http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~electriconf/2004/Hobbs_IEEE_TEAM.pdf
- Blumsack, S. (2006). Network topologies and transmission investment under electric industry restructuring. Ph.D. Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, PAGoogle Scholar
- Blumsack S., Lave L., Ilic M. (2007) A quantitative analysis of the relationship between congestion and reliability in electric power networks. The Energy Journal 28: 73–100Google Scholar
- California ISO and London Economics International. (2003). A Proposed methodology for evaluating the economic benefits of transmission expansions in a restructured wholesale electricity market. Ethiopia. http://www.caiso.com/docs/2003/03/25/2003032514285219307.
- Gans J. S., King S. P. (1999) Options for electricity transmission regulation in Australia. University of Melbourne, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Grande O.S., Wangensteen I. (2000) Alternative models for congestion management and pricing impact on network planning and physical operation. CIGRE, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Hogan, W. (2000). Flowgate Rights and Wrongs, Mimeo. JFK School of Government, Harvard Electricity Policy Group Harvard University. http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/people/whogan.
- Hogan, W. (2002a). Financial transmission right incentives: Applications beyond hedging. Presentation to HEPG Twenty-Eight Plenary Sessions, May 31. http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/people/whogan.
- Hogan, W. (2002b). Financial transmission right formulations, Mimeo. JFK School of Government, Harvard Electricity Policy Group Harvard University. http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/people/whogan.
- Joskow P. (2005a). Transmission policy in the United States Utilities Policy, 13(Winter), 95–115Google Scholar
- Joskow, P. (2005b). Patterns of transmission investment Electricity infrastructure investment workshop. Paris, France: CRE. March 15, 2005. http://econ-www.mit.edu/fileq/1174.
- Krellenstein, G. (2004). Transmission financing. Paper Presented at the first Carnegie Mellon conference on electricity, Pittsburgh, PA. http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~electriconf/old2004.
- Léautier T.-O. (2000) Regulation of an electric power transmission company. The Energy Journal 21: 61–92Google Scholar
- O’Neill, R. P., Helman, U., Hobbs, B. F., Stewart Jr., W. R., & Rothkopf M. H. (2002) A joint energy and transmission rights auction: Proposal and properties. http://crri.rutgers.edu/pub/wp/IEEEJETRA.pdf.
- Oren S. (1997) Economic inefficiency of passive transmission rights in congested electricity systems with competitive generation. The Energy Journal 18: 63–83Google Scholar
- Rosellón, J., Weigt, H. (2007). A combined merchant-regulatory mechanism for electricity transmission in Europe Paper presented at the Trans-Atlantic INFRADAY Conference on Applied Infrastructure Modeling and Policy Analysis, University of Maryland, College Park, November 2, 2007.Google Scholar
- Schweppe F. C., Caramanis M. C., Tabors R. D., Bohn R. E. (1988) Spot pricing of electricity. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Sheffrin A., Wolak F. A. (2001) Methodology for analyzing transmission upgrades: Two alternative proposals. Mimeo, California ISOGoogle Scholar
- Stigler H., Todem C. (2005) Optimization of the Austrian electricity sector (control zone of VERBUND APG) under the constraints of network capacities by nodal pricing. Central European Journal of Operations Research 13: 105–125Google Scholar
- Stoft S. (2006) Transmission investment in a deregulated power market, chapter 4 in in F. Lévêque, Competitive electricity markets and sustainability. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
- Stoft S., & Graves F. (2000) PBR designs for transcos: Towards a comparative framework. The Electricity Journal, 13(7), August 2000.Google Scholar
- Thomas, R., Mount, T., Schuler, R., Schulze, W., & Zimmerman, R. (2006). Markets for reactive power and reliability: A white paper. Engineering and Economics of Electricity Research Group, Cornell University, December. http://www.pserc.wisc.edu/ecow/get/generalinf/presentati/psercsemin1/3psercsemin/schulze_pserc_seminar_dec06.pdf.
- Vogelsang I. (2006) Electricity transmission pricing and performance-based regulation. Energy Journal 27: 97–126Google Scholar