Journal of Regulatory Economics

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 37–65 | Cite as

Voluntary development of environmental management systems: motivations and regulatory implications

  • Toshihiro Uchida
  • Paul J. Ferraro
Original Article


Encouraging firms to develop voluntarily more comprehensive environmental management systems (EMSs) is touted as a policy tool to augment mandatory environmental regulations. Using a unique dataset of environmental management practices of Japanese manufacturers and controlling for self-selection bias in survey responses, we find that proxies for regulatory pressures and consumer pressures are the most important factors that motivate firms toward more comprehensive EMSs. Despite the oft-claimed “voluntary” nature of EMS development, our results show that the government may have a role to play in both directly and indirectly affecting EMS development by firms.


Environmental management Japan Pollution Voluntary approaches 

JEL Classifications

Q5 L5 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aghion P., Bloom N., Blundell R., Griffith R., & Howitt P. (2002). Competition and innovation: an inverted U relationship. NBER Working Paper No. 9269, NBER.Google Scholar
  2. Aghion P., Harris C., Howitt P., Vickers J. (2001). Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation. Review of Economic Studies 68(3): 467–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahn S. (2002). Competition, innovation and productivity growth: A review of theory and evidence. OECD Working Paper No. 317, OECD.Google Scholar
  4. Anton W.R.Q., Deltas G., Khanna M. (2004). Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48, 632–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arora S., Gangopadhyay S. (1995). Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 28(3): 289–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arrow K.J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson R.R. (eds) The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Bester H., Petrakis E. (1993). The incentives for cost reduction in a differentiated industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization 11, 519–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blundell R., Griffiths R., van Reenen J. (1999). Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of british manufacturing firms. Review of Economic Studies 66(3): 529–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonanno G., Haworth B. (1998). Intensity of competition and the choice between product and process innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization 16, 495–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carraro C., Leveque F. (1999). Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  11. Coglianese C., Nash J. (2001). Environmental management systems and the New Policy Agenda. In: Coglianese C., Nash J. (eds) Regulating from the inside:Can environmental management systems achieve policy goals?. Washington DC, Resources for the FutureGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen W.M. (1995). Empirical studies of innovative activities. In: Stoneman P. (eds) Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Oxford, Blackwell PublishersGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen W.M., & Levin. R. C. (1989). Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In: R. L. Schmalensee & R. D. Willig (eds.), Handbook of industrial organization. North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Crow M. (2000). Beyond experiment. Environmental Forum May/June, 19–29Google Scholar
  15. Dasgupta S., Hettige H., Wheeler D. (2000). What improves environmental compliance? Evidence from Mexican industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39, 39–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davidson R., MacKinnon J.G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics. New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Decker C.S. (2003). Corporate environmentalism and environmental statutory permitting. Journal of Law and Economics 46(1): 103–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Decker C.S. (2004). Voluntary pollution control and local economic conditions as determinants of environmental monitoring and enforcement Working paper. Nebraska, University of OmahaGoogle Scholar
  19. Delmas M.A. (2000). Barriers and incentives to the adoption of ISO 14001 in the United States. Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum Fall, 1–38Google Scholar
  20. Denton D.K. (1994). Enviro-management: How smart companies turn environmental costs into profits. New Jersey, Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  21. Esty D.C., & Chertow M.R. (1997). Thinking ecologically: An introduction. In: M. R. Chertow & D. C. Esty (eds.), Thinking ecologically: The next generation of environmental policy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Geroski P. (1995). Market sstructure, corporate performance and innovative activity. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldberg P.K., Knetter M.M. (1999). Measuring the intensity of competition in export markets. Journal of International Economics 47, 27–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamilton J.T. (1995). Pollution as News: Media and stock market reactions to the release inventory data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28(1): 98–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henriques I., Sadorsky P. (1996). The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30(3): 381–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huber P.J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under Nonstandard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability,1, 221–233Google Scholar
  27. ISO (2005). The ISO Survey (2004). Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
  28. Khanna M. (2001). Non-mandatory approaches to environmental protection. Journal of Economic Surveys 15(3): 291–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khanna M., Anton W.R. Q. (2002). Corporate environmental management: Regulatory and market-based pressures. Land Economics 78(4): 539–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lutz S., Lyon T.P., Maxwell J.W. (2000). Quality leadership when regulatory standards are forthcoming. Journal of Industrial Economics XLVIII(3): 331–348Google Scholar
  31. Lyon T., & Maxwell J.W. (2002). Voluntary approaches to environmental regulation: A survey. In: M. Franzini & A. Nicita(eds.), Economic institutions and environmental policy. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Lyon T., Maxwell J.W. (2004). Corporate environmentalism and public policy. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin R. (1998). ISO 14001 Guidance Manual, Technical Report NEDR/98-06 University of Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  34. Maxwell J.W., Lyon T.P., Hackett S.C. (2000). Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism. Journal of Law and Economics XLIII(2): 583–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nakamura M., Takahashi T., Vertinsky I. (2001). Why Japanese firms choose to certify: A study of managerial responses to environmental issues. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42(1): 23–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nickell S. (1996). Competition and corporate performance. Journal of Political Economy 104, 724–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nihon Keizai Shimbun (2002). Report for the Fifth Annual Environmental Survey (Kankyo Keieido Chousa Houkokusho). Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shimbun (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  38. OECD (2003). Voluntary approaches for environmental policy: effectiveness, efficiency and usage in policy mixes. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  39. Qiu L.D. (1997). On the dynamic efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot Equilibria. Journal of Economic Theory 75 75:213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rogers W.H. (1993). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin 13, 19–23Google Scholar
  41. Roht-Arriaza N. (1997). Environmental management systems and environmental protection: Can ISO 14001 be useful within the context of APEC?. Journal of Environmental Development 6, 292–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rondinelli D.A. (2001). A new generation of environmental policy: Government-business collaboration in environmental management. Environmental Law Reporter 31(8): 10891–10905Google Scholar
  43. Rugman A.M., Verbeke A. (1998). Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal 19, 363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schumpeter J.A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York, HarperGoogle Scholar
  45. Segerson K., Miceli T.J. (1998). Voluntary environmental agreements: Good or bad news for environmental protection?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36(2): 109–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spence M. (1984). Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. Econometrica 52(1): 101–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stapleton P.J., Glover M.A., Petie Davis S. (2001). Environmental management systems: An implementation guide for small and medium sized organizations. Technical Report. NSF International.Google Scholar
  48. Symeonidis G. (2003). Comparing Cournot and Bertrand equilibria in a differentiated Duopoly with product R&D. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21, 39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Toyo Keizai (1999). Japan company handbook [First section, Second section] Autumn (1999). Tokyo, Toyo KeizaiGoogle Scholar
  50. Toyo Keizai (2002). Japan company handbook [First section, Second section] Autumn (2002). Tokyo, Toyo KeizaiGoogle Scholar
  51. U.S. EPA (1999). Aiming for excellence: actions to encourage stewardship and accelerate environmental progress. Report of the EPA Innovations Task Force. EPA.Google Scholar
  52. U.S. EPA (2004). EPA’s strategy for determining the role of environmental management systems in regulatory programs. Working Paper. EPA.Google Scholar
  53. Van Cayseele P.J.G. (1998). Market structure and innovation: A survey of the last twenty years. De Economist 146, 391–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Welch E.W., Mori Y., Aoyagi-Usui M. (2002). Voluntary adoption of ISO 14001 in Japan: Mechanisms, stages and effects. Business Strategy and the Environment 11, 43–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. White H. (1980). “A Heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48, 817–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wooldridge J.M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Massachusetts, The MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Global Environmental StrategiesKanagawaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy StudiesGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations