Abstract
It is well known that market prices of risk play an important role in commodity derivative valuation. There is an extensive literature showing that market prices of risk vary through time. Based on these results, a factor model, with two long- and short-term factors, with market prices of risk depending on these underlying asset factors is proposed and estimated, using data from crude oil, heating oil, unleaded gasoline and natural gas futures prices traded at NYMEX. The valuation results obtained with an extensive sample of commodity American options traded at NYMEX show that this model with time-varying market prices of risk outperforms standard models with constant market prices of risk.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In this model large moves affecting the long-term run are captured through the long-term factor, whereas small, short-term deviations from the long-term run are captured through the short-term factor.
As shown in Schwartz and Smith (2000), their short-term/long-term model is equivalent to the stochastic convenience yield model by Gibson and Schwartz (1990), in which the convenience yield is assumed to follow an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process. Therefore, although not explicitly considered in our model with time-varying market prices of risk, convenience yields are assumed to follow a mean-reverting process. Recently, Bakshi et al. (2013) point out that a third factor, the commodity momentum, is needed to describe the cross-sectional and time-series variation of commodity returns.
Here we assume homoskedasticity in the error terms. Trolle and Schwartz (2009) present a model allowing for stochastic volatility for crude oil prices, using daily data. More recently, Christoffersen et al. (2013) present a discrete-time GARCH-type model allowing for both time-varying volatility and jumps. However, in this paper we have confined ourselves to the constant volatility case with no jumps for several reasons. Firstly, here we are using weekly data. Secondly, a stochastic volatility model with jumps is probably more realistic, but also more complex so much the Kalman filter formulae cannot be computed explicitly in an exact way and it is necessary the use of approximations, such as the extended Kalman filter, whereas all the formulae in this article are exact.
It should be noted that in the paper by Casassus and Collin-Dufresne (2005) the estimation is carried out using the the maximum likelihood method, whereas in the present paper we use the Kalman filter method.
Additional details about the contracts can be found on the CME Group web page.
It is worth noting that \(\alpha _{t}\) and \(\alpha _{t}^{*}\) are deterministic factors and therefore their volatility is zero. Moreover, \(\alpha _{t}=\alpha _{t}^{*}=0\) in the case of crude oil.
E*[] and Var*[] are the mean and variance under the risk neutral measure.
References
Archarya, V. V., Lochstoer, L. A., & Ramadorai, T. (2013). Limits to arbitrage and hedging: Evidence from commodity markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(2), 441–465.
Baker, S., & Routledge, B. (2012). The price of oil risk. Working Paper, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University.
Bakshi, G., Gao, X., & Rossi, A. (2013). A better specified asset pricing model to explain the cross-section and time-series of commodity returns. Working Paper, Smith School of Business, University of Maryland.
Bakshi, G., & Wu, L. (2010). The behavior of risk and market prices of risk over the Nasdaq bubble period. Management Science, 56(12), 2251–2264.
Basu, D., & Miffre, J. (2013). Capturing the risk premium of commodity futures: The role of hedging pressure. Working Paper, EDHEC Business School.
Bhar, R., & Lee, D. (2011). Time-varying market price of risk in the crude oil futures market. The Journal of Futures Market, 31(8), 779–807.
Bessembinder, H. (1992). Systematic risk, hedging pressure, and risk premiums in futures markets. Review of Financial Studes, 5(4), 637–667.
Bessembinder, H., & Lemmon, M. L. (2002). Equilibrium pricing and optimal hedging in electricity forward markets. The Journal of Finance, 57, 1347–1382.
Casassus, J., & Collin-Dufresne, P. (2005). Stochastic convenience yield implied from commodity futures and interests rates. The Journal of Finance, 60(5), 2283–2328.
Casassus, J. P., Liu, P., & Tang, K. (2013). Economics linkages, relative scarcity, and commodity futures returns. Review of Financial Studies, 26(5), 1324–1362.
Christoffersen, P. C., Jacobs, K., & Li, B. (2013). Dynamic jump intensities and risk premiums in crude oil futures and options markets. Working Paper.
Dai, Q., & Singleton, K. J. (2002). Expectations puzzles time-varying risk premia, and affine models of the term structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 63, 415–441.
Duffee, G. R. (2002). Term premia and interest rate forecasts in affine models. Journal of Finance, 57, 405–443.
Fama, E. F. (1984). Term premiums in bond returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 529–546.
Fama, E. F., & Bliss, R. R. (1987). The information in long-maturity forward rates. American Economic Review, 77(4), 680–692.
Fama, E. F., & French, E. R. (1987). Commodity futures prices: Some evidence on forecast power, premiums, and the theory of storage. Journal of Business, 60(1), 55–73.
Fama, E. F., & French, E. R. (1988). Permanent and temporary components of stock prices. Journal of Political Economy, 96, 246–273.
Gibson, R., & Schwartz, E. S. (1990). Stochastic convenience yield and the pricing of commodity claims. The Journal of Finance, 45, 959–976.
Harvey, A. C. (1989). Forecasting structural time series models and the Kalman filter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hong, H., & Yogo, M. (2012). What does futures market interest tell us about the macroeconomy and asset prices? Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 473–490.
Jalali-Naini, A., & Kazemi-Manesh, M. (2006). Price volatility, hedging and variable risk premium in the crude oil market. OPEC Review, 30(2), 55–70.
Kolos, S. P., & Ronn, E. I. (2008). Estimating the commodity market price of risk for energy prices. Energy Economics, 30, 621–641.
Le, A., & Zhu, H. (2013). Risk premia in gold lease rates. Working Paper.
Longstaff, F., & Schwartz, E. (2001). Valuing American options by simulations a simple least squares approach. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(1), 113–147.
Lucia, J., & Torro, H. (2011). Short-term electricity futures prices: Evidence on the time-varying risk premium. International Review of Economics and Finance, 20(4), 750–763.
Mirantes, A. G., Población, J., & Serna, G. (2012a). The stochastic seasonal behavior of natural gas prices. European Financial Management, 18, 410–443.
Mirantes, A. G., Población, J., & Serna, G. (2012b). Analyzing the dynamics of the refining margin: Implications for valuation and hedging. Quantitative Finance, 12, 1839–1855.
Moosa, I. A., & Al-Loughani, N. E. (1994). Unbiasedness and time varying risk premia in the crude oil futures market. Energy Economics, 16(2), 99–105.
Oksendal, B. (1992). Stochastic differential equations. An introduction with applications (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
Prokopczuk, M., & Simen, C. W. (2013). Variance risk premia in commodity markets. Working Paper, University of Reading.
Routledge, B. R., Seppi, D., & Spatt, C. W. (2001). The “spark” spread: Cross-commodity equilibrium restrictions and electricity. Working Paper.
Sardosky, P. (2002). Time-varying risk premiums in petroleum futures prices. Energy Economics, 24, 539–556.
Schwartz, E. S. (1997). The stochastic behavior of commodity prices: Implication for valuation and hedging. The Journal of Finance, 52, 923–973.
Schwartz, E. S., & Smith, J. E. (2000). Short-term variations and long-term dynamics in commodity prices. Management Science, 46(7), 893–911.
Sorensen, C. (2002). Modeling seasonality in agricultural commodity futures. The Journal of Futures Markets, 22, 393–426.
Trolle, A. B., & Schwartz, E. S. (2009). Unspanned stochastic volatility and the pricing of commodity derivatives. Review of Financial Studies, 22(11), 4423–4461.
Trolle, A. B., & Schwartz, E. S. (2010). Variance risk premia in energy commodities. Journal of Derivatives, 17(3), 15–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Kalman filtering
Detailed accounts for Kalman filtering are given in Harvey (1989) and also in Bakshi and Wu (2010) among others.
Appendix: Kalman filtering
Let \(Z_t=(\xi _t\chi _t\alpha _t\alpha _t^*)^{\prime }\) be the vector of all factors.Footnote 10 The “risk-neutral” SDE of \(Z_{t}\) can be expressed as \(dZ_t =\left( {b^{\diamondsuit }+AZ_t} \right) dt+\Omega dW_{Zt}^{\diamondsuit }\), where \(dW_{Zt}^{\diamondsuit }\) is a vector of independent Brownian motions, and therefore \(\hbox {Var}(dZ_{t})=R= \Omega \Omega ^{T}\) (\(\Omega ^{T}\) is the transpose matrix of \(\Omega \)), with the restriction explained above: \(b^{\diamondsuit }=(\begin{array}{cccc} \mu _t-\lambda _{\xi 0}&-\lambda _{\chi 0}&0&0\end{array})\) and:
Under this notation\(X_t=cZ_t \), where \(c=(\begin{array}{cccc}1&1&1&0\end{array})\).
It is easy to prove that the (unique) solution of that problem is (Oksendal 1992):
It is clear that, under the risk-neutral measure, given \(Z_0 \), \(Z_t \) is Gaussian, with mean and varianceFootnote 11
As \(X_t=c Z_t =\xi _t +\chi _t +\alpha _t\), then under the risk-neutral measure, \(X_t\) is also Gaussian with mean and variance:
This provides a valuation scheme for all sorts of commodity contingent claims as financial derivatives on commodity prices, real options, investment decisions and other more. In particular, the price of a futures contract traded at time “\(t\)” with maturity at time “\(t+T\)” is: \(F_{t,T} =E^{*}\left[ {S_{t+T} \left\| {I_t } \right. } \right] =\exp \left\{ {E^{*}\left[ {X_{t+T} \left\| {I_t } \right. } \right] +\frac{1}{2}Var^{*}\left[ {X_{t+T} \left\| {I_t } \right. } \right] } \right\} \), where \(I_{t}\) is the information available at time “\(t\)”. It can be expressed as:
where \(g(T)=ce^{A T}\int _t^{t+T} {e^{-A s}} b^{\diamondsuit }ds+\frac{1}{2}ce^{A T} \left[ {\int _t^{t+T} {e^{-A s}R(e^{-A T}} )^{T}ds } \right] (e^{A T})^{T}c^{T}\), which is a deterministic function.
The Kalman filter technique is a recursive methodology that estimates the unobservable time series and the state variables or factors \((Z_{t})\) based on an observable time series \((Y_{t})\), which depends on these state variables.
If the difference between the current period and the initial period is one period time, \(Z_{t}\) follows the discrete process:
where \(c_t =e^{At}\int _{t-1}^t {e^{-As}bds} \in \mathfrak {R}^{h}, T=e^{A}\in \mathfrak {R}^{h x h}and \psi _t \in \mathfrak {R}^{h}\) is a vector of serially uncorrelated Gaussian disturbances with zero mean and covariance matrix \(Q=(e^{A})\left[ {\int _{t-1}^t {e^{-As}R(e^{-As})^{T}ds} } \right] (e^{A})^{T}\). This equation will be called, following standard conventions in the literature, the transition equation. It is worth noting that expression (13) can be derived from expression (9) and thus \(c_{t}\), \(T\) and \(Q\) can be computed from expression (9).
The measurement equation is just the expression of the log-futures prices \((Y_{t})\) in terms of the factors \((Z_{t})\) by adding serially uncorrelated disturbances with zero mean \((\eta _{t})\) to take into account measurement errors derived from bid-ask spreads, price limits, non-simultaneity of observations, errors in data, etc. To avoid dealing with a great amount of parameters, the covariance matrix \(H_{t}\) will be assumed diagonal with main diagonal entries equal to \(\sigma _{\eta }\). This simple structure for the measurement errors is imposed so that the serial correlation and cross correlation in the log-prices is attributed to the variation of the unobservable state variables. The measurement equation (which can be derived from expression (12))will be expressed as:
where \(Y_t ,d_t \in \mathfrak {R}^{n}, M_t \in \mathfrak {R}^{n x h}, Z_t \in \mathfrak {R}^{h}\), \(h\) is the number of state variables, or factors, in the model, and \(\eta _t \in \mathfrak {R}^{n}\) is a vector of serially uncorrelated Gaussian disturbances with zero mean and covariance matrix \(H_{t}\).
Let \(Y_{t|t-1}\) be the conditional expectation of \(Y_{t}\) and let \(\Xi _t\) be the covariance matrix of \(Y_{t}\) conditional on all information available at time \(t-1\). Then, after omitting unessential constants, the log-likelihood function can be expressed as:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mirantes, A.G., Población, J. & Serna, G. Commodity derivative valuation under a factor model with time-varying market prices of risk. Rev Deriv Res 18, 75–93 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-014-9104-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-014-9104-1