Housing Formation and Unemployment Rates: Evidence from 1975–2011

  • Jung Hyun Choi
  • Gary Painter


This paper investigates the impact of shocks in the unemployment rate on household formation. Prior research has shown that negative economic shocks reduce household formation, but does not inform how long the declines in household formation will persist. Using time series data from 1975 to 2011, we examine how households respond to unemployment rate shocks and estimate the length of time it takes for households to return to its original level in a vector autoregressive model. The results demonstrate that household formation falls in the quarter after unemployment increases, and that it can take up to 10 quarters to return its previous level. While this is a substantial length of time, one implication of these results is that even a permanent increase in the unemployment rate will not permanently affect housing formation in the long run.


Housing formation Housing demand Unemployment Vector autoregressive (VAR) 


  1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle (in second international symposium on information theory, pp. 267–281). Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.Google Scholar
  2. Billari, F. C., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2007). Should i stay or should i go? The impact of age norms on leaving home. Demography, 44(1), 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, S. D., Davis, M. A., Gallin, J., & Martin, R. R. (2009). What moves housing markets: a variance decomposition of the rent-price ratio. Journal of Urban Economics, 66(2), 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coulson, N. E., & Grieco, P. (2013). Mobility and motgages: evidence from the PSID. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demyanyk, Y., Hryshko, D., José Luengo-Prado, M., & Sørensen, B. E. (2013). Moving to a Job: The Role of Home Equity, Debt, and Access to Credit. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper Series 13–05.Google Scholar
  6. Enders, W. (2009). Applied Econometric Times Series. 3rd ed. Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-intergration: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–267.Google Scholar
  8. Farber, H. S. (2012). Unemployment in the great recession: did the housing market crisis prevent the unemployed from moving to take jobs. American Economic Review, 102(3), 520–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldscheider, F. K., & Da Vanzo, J. (1989). Pathways to independent living in early adulthood: marriage, semiautonomy, and premarital residential independence. Demography, 26, 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldscheider, F. K., & Goldscheider, C. (1993). Leaving home before marriage. ethinicity, familism and generational relationships. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  11. Granger, C. W. J. (1983). Co-Integrated Variables and Error-Correcting Models. UCSD Dicussion Paper 83–13.Google Scholar
  12. Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Haurin, D. R., & Rosenthal, S. (2007). The influence of household formation on homeownership rates across time and race. Real Estate Economics, 35(4), 411–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jarociriski, M., & Smets, F. R. (2008). House prices and the stance of monetary policy. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 90(4), 339–365.Google Scholar
  15. Johansen, S. (1991). Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors. In Long-run Economic Relationship: Readings in Cointegration. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
  16. Kaplan, G. (2009) Boomerang Kids: Labor Market Dynamics and Moving Back Home. Working Paper 675, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  17. Kaplan, G. (2010) Moving Back Home: Insurance Against Labor Market Risk, Working Paper 677, , Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, K. O., & Painter, G. (2013). What happens to household formation in a recession? Journal of Urban Economics, 76, 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Molloy, R., & Shan, H. (2013). The post-foreclosure experience of U.S. households. Real Estate Economics, 41(2), 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murphy, M., & Wang, W. (1998). Family and sociodemographic influences on patterns of leaving home in postwar Britain. Demography, 35, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mykyta, L., & Macartney, S. (2011). The Effects of Recession on Household Composition: “Doubling Up” and Economic Well-Being. SEHSD Working Paper, Number 2011–4 U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  22. Painter, G., & Redfearn, C. (2002). The role of interest rates in influencing long-run homeownership rates. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 25(2/3), 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pew Research Center. (2009) Home for the holidays… and every other day. Washington, DC.
  24. Pew Research Center. 2010. The Return of the Multi-Generational Family Household. Washington, DC.
  25. Sims, C., Stock, J., & Watson, M. W. (1990). Inference in linear time series models with some unit roots. Econometrica, 58, 113–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weimer, E.E. (2011). The Effect of Unemployment on Household Consumption and Doubling Up. National Poverty Center Working Paper Series, WP#11-12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sol Price School of Public Policy, Lusk Center for Real EstateUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations