The Paradox of Judicial Foreclosure: Collateral Value Uncertainty and Mortgage Rates



Using a sample of 26,892 rate quotes on home purchase loan applications, the current paper investigates interstate variation in residential mortgage interest rates. More specifically, we find posted rate quotes by lenders are directly related to measures of foreclosure process risk including the length of time required to complete foreclosure proceedings within a jurisdiction and the presence (and length) of statutory redemption periods. Mortgage rates are also found to be contingent upon differential underwriting fees and conditions, housing appreciation and volatility measures, and the competitive nature of the economic marketplace in which each lender operates. In contrast to the previous literature, we find the judicial foreclosure process requirements exert little to no impact on observable mortgage interest rate quotes after controlling for these additional dimensions of risk.


Judicial foreclosure Power of sale foreclosure Collateral value uncertainty Mortgage rate quotes 


  1. Allen, M., & Dare, W. (2004a). The effects of charm listing prices on house transaction prices. Real Estate Economics, 32(4), 695–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, M., & Dare, W. (2004b). Charm pricing as a signal of listing price precision. Journal of Housing Research, 15(2), 113–127.Google Scholar
  3. Ambrose, B., & Pennington-Cross, A. (2000). Local economic risk factors and the primary and secondary mortgage markets. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30(6), 683–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambrose, B., & Sanders, A. (2005). Legal restrictions in personal loan markets. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 30(2), 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ambrose, B., Pennington-Cross, A., & Yezer, A. (2002). Credit rationing in the U.S. mortgage market: evidence from variation in FHA market shares. Journal of Urban Economics, 51(2), 272–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ambrose, B., LaCour-Little, M., & Sanders, A. (2005). Does regulatory capital arbitrage, reputation, or asymmetric information drive securitization? Journal of Financial Services Research, 28(1–3), 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Archer, W., Elmer, P., Harrison, D., & Ling, D. (2002). Determinants of multifamily mortgage default. Real Estate Economics, 30(3), 445–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Avery, R., Bostic, R., Calem, P., & Canner, G. (2000). Credit scoring: statistical issues and evidence from credit-bureau files. Real Estate Economics, 28(3), 523–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berkovec, J., Canner, G., Gabriel, S., & Hannan, T. (1994). Race, redlining, and residential mortgage loan performance. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 9(3), 263–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Billett, M., Flannery, M., & Garfinkel, J. (1995). The effect of lender identity on a borrowing firm’s equity return. Journal of Finance, 50(2), 699–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bizer, G., & Schindler, R. (2005). Direct evidence of ending-digit drop-off in price information processing. Psychology and Marketing, 22(10), 771–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blackwell, D., & Winters, D. (1997). Banking relationships and the effect of monitoring on loan pricing. Journal of Financial Research, 20(2), 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blackwell, D., & Winters, D. (2000). Local lending markets: what a small business owner/manager needs to know. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 39(2), 62–79.Google Scholar
  14. Brenner, G., & Brenner, R. (1982). Memory and markets, or why are you paying $2.00 for a widget? Journal of Business, 55(1), 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bridewell, D. (1938). The effects of defective mortgage laws on home financing. Law and Contemporary Problems, 5(4), 545–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Calem, P. (1996). Mortgage credit availability in low- and moderate-income minority neighborhoods: are information externalities critical? Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 13(1), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campbell, T., & Dietrich, K. (1983). The determinants of default on insured conventional residential mortgage loans. Journal of Finance, 38(5), 1569–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carter, R., & Manaster, S. (1990). Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. Journal of Finance, 45(4), 1045–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chomsisengphet, S., & Pennington-Cross, A. (2006). The evolution of the subprime mortgage market. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 88(1), 31–56.Google Scholar
  20. Christie, W., & Schultz, P. (1994). Why do NASDAQ market makers avoid odd-eighth quotes? Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1813–1840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Christie, W., Harris, J., & Schultz, P. (1994). Why did NASDAQ market makers stop avoiding odd-eighth quotes? Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1841–1860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clauretie, T. (1987). The impact of interstate foreclosure cost differences and the value of mortgages on default rates. Real Estate Economics, 15(3), 152–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Clauretie, T. (1989). State foreclosure laws, risk shifting, and the private mortgage insurance industry. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 56(3), 544–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Clauretie, T., & Herzog, T. (1990). The effect of state foreclosure laws on loan losses: evidence from the mortgage insurance industry. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 22(2), 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clauretie, T., & Jameson, M. (1990). Interest rates and the foreclosure process: an agency problem in FHA mortgage insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 57(4), 701–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Deng, Y. (1997). Mortgage termination: an empirical hazard model with stochastic term structure. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 14(3), 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Deng, Y., Quigley, J., & Van Order, R. (2000). Mortgage terminations, heterogeneity and the exercise of mortgage options. Econometrica, 68(2), 275–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Desai, C., Elliehausen, G., & Steinbuks, J. (2014). Effects of bankruptcy exemptions and foreclosure laws on mortgage default and foreclosure rates. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  29. Diamond, D. (1989). Reputation acquisition in debt markets. Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), 828–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fama, E. (1985). What’s different about banks? Journal of Monetary Economics, 15(1), 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Follain, J., & Dunsky, R. (1997). The demand for mortgage debt and the income tax. Journal of Housing Research, 8(2), 155–199.Google Scholar
  32. Ghent, A., & Kudlyak, M. (2011). Recourse and residential mortgage default: evidence from US states. Review of Financial Studies, 24(9), 3139–3186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2013). The determinants of attitudes towards strategic default on mortgages. Journal of Finance, 68(4), 1473–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harrison, D. (2001). The importance of lender heterogeneity in mortgage lending. Journal of Urban Economics, 49(2), 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harrison, D., Noordewier, T., & Yavas, A. (2004). Do riskier borrowers borrow more? Real Estate Economics, 32(3), 385–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hendershottt, P., & Van Order, R. (1987). Pricing mortgages: an interpretation of the models and results. Journal of Financial Services Research, 1(1), 19–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kane, E., & Malkiel, B. (1965). Bank portfolio allocation, deposit variability, and the availability doctrine. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 79(1), 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. LaCour-Little, M., & Malpezzi, S. (2003). Appraisal quality and residential mortgage default: evidence from Alaska. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 27(2), 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lambert, Z. (1975). Perceived prices as related to odd and even price endings. Journal of Retailing, 51(3), 13–22. & 78.Google Scholar
  40. Lang, W., & Nakamura, L. (1990). The dynamics of credit markets in a model with learning. Journal of Monetary Economics, 26(2), 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lang, W., & Nakamura, L. (1993). A model of redlining. Journal of Urban Economics, 33(2), 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ling, D., & McGill, G. (1998). Evidence on the demand for mortgage debt by owner-occupants. Journal of Urban Economics, 44(3), 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ling, D., & Wachter, S. (1998). Information externalities and home mortgage underwriting. Journal of Urban Economics, 44(3), 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lummer, S., & McConnell, J. (1989). Further evidence on the bank lending process and the capital-market response to bank loan agreements. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marschoun, M. (2000). Availability of mortgage loans in volatile real estate markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 47(3), 443–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Meador, M. (1982). The effect of mortgage laws on home mortgage rates. Journal of Economics and Business, 34(2), 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Munnell, A., Tootell, G., Browne, L., & McEneaney, J. (1996). Mortgage lending in Boston: interpreting HMDA data. American Economic Review, 86(1), 25–53.Google Scholar
  48. Nichols, J., Pennington-Cross, A., & Yezer, A. (2005). Borrower self-selection, underwriting costs, and subprime mortgage credit supply. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 30(2), 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Noordewier, T., Harrison, D., & Ramagopal, K. (2001). Semivariance of property value estimates as a determinant of default risk. Real Estate Economics, 29(1), 127–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Palmon, O., Smith, B., & Sopranzetti, B. (2004). Clustering in real estate prices: determinants and consequences. Journal of Real Estate Research, 26(2), 115–136.Google Scholar
  51. Pence, K. (2003). Foreclosing on opportunity: state laws and mortgage credit. Federal Reserve Board, Finance and Economics Discussion Series #2003–16.Google Scholar
  52. Pence, K. (2006). Foreclosing on opportunity: state laws and mortgage credit. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(1), 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pennington-Cross, A. (2006). The value of foreclosed property. Journal of Real Estate Research, 28(2), 193–214.Google Scholar
  54. Pennington-Cross, A. (2010). The duration of foreclosures in the subprime mortgage market: a competing risks model with mixing. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 40(2), 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Petersen, M., & Rajan, R. (1994). The benefits of lending relationships: evidence from small business data. Journal of Finance, 49(1), 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Posey, L., & Yavas, A. (2001). Adjustable and fixed rate mortgages as a screening mechanism for default risk. Journal of Urban Economics, 49(1), 54–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Quercia, R., & Stegman, M. (1992). Residential mortgage default: a review of the literature. Journal of Housing Research, 3(2), 341–379.Google Scholar
  58. Salter, S., Johnson, K., & Spurlin, P. (2007). Off-dollar pricing, residential property prices, and marketing time. Journal of Housing Research, 16(1), 33–46.Google Scholar
  59. Schaaf, A. (1966). Regional differences in mortgage financing costs. Journal of Finance, 21(1), 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schindler, R., & Kirby, P. (1997). Patterns of rightmost digits used in advertised prices: implications for nine-ending effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schwartz, E., & Torous, W. (1989). Prepayment and the valuation of mortgage-backed securities. Journal of Finance, 44(2), 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schwartz, E., & Torous, W. (1992). Prepayment, default, and the valuation of mortgage pass-through securities. Journal of Business, 65(2), 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Seiler, M., Seiler, V., Lane, M., & Harrison, D. (2012). Fear, shame, and guilt: economic and behavioral motivations for strategic default. Real Estate Economics, 40(S1), 199–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stiglitz, J., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410.Google Scholar
  65. Twedt, D. (1965). Does the ‘9 fixation’ in retail pricing really promote sales? Journal of Marketing, 29(4), 54–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Von Furstenberg, G. (1969). Default risk on FHA-insured home mortgages as a function of the terms of financing: a quantitative analysis. Journal of Finance, 24(3), 459–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. White, B. (2010a). Take this house and shove it: the emotional drivers of strategic default. Arizona Legal Studies, Discussion Paper No. 10–17.Google Scholar
  68. White, B. (2010b). Underwater and not walking away: shame, fear and the social management of the housing crisis. Wake Forest Law Review, 45, 971–1023.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rawls College of BusinessTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  2. 2.K. Dane Brooksher Endowed Chair of Real Estate and Finance, Mason School of BusinessThe College of William and MaryWilliamsburgUSA

Personalised recommendations