The Effect of Listing Price Strategy on Transaction Selling Prices



While true underlying home values are expected to be randomly distributed, actual residential listing prices tend to be highly clustered. Particularly, more than 75 % of the homes in our sample are associated with a round or “just below” round asking price. This study provides a theoretical and empirical examination of how the thousands digit in a home’s asking price is related to the final transaction price relative to its true underlying value. Our findings suggest that, on average, homes listed using a “just below” pricing strategy are associated with the greatest discount negotiated relative to the asking price. However, the higher initial degree of list overpricing reflected in “just below” pricing compared with other strategies more than offsets the greater discount. Therefore, “just below” is the most effective pricing strategy for the seller in terms of a greater dollar yield relative to value. These empirical findings have economic significance and are robust across both “buyer” and “seller” housing markets, new versus existing homes, and across multiple home price ranges.


List pricing strategies Time on the market Residential real estate 



We would like to thank Oded Palmon, Ben Sopranzetti, Paul Anglin, and Tom Springer for comments on earlier drafts of this study. We also wish to thank the Virginia Association of Realtors® (VAR) for access to their sample of homeowners for the experimental component of this study. We specifically acknowledge the special assistance of Stacey Ricks at VAR. We would also like to thank Real Estate Information Network (REIN) in Hampton Roads, Virginia for providing transactions data for the empirical aspect of this study. All errors and omissions remain our own.


  1. Allen, M., & Dare, W. (2004). The effects of charm listing prices on house transaction prices. Real Estate Economics, 32(4), 695–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, M., & Dare, W. (2006). Charm pricing as a signal of listing price precision. Journal of Housing Research, 15(2), 113–127.Google Scholar
  3. Anglin, P., Rutherford, R., & Springer, T. (2003). The trade-off between the selling price of residential properties and time-on-the-market: the impact of price setting. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 26(1), 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold, M. (1999). Search, bargaining and optimal asking prices. Real Estate Economics, 27(3), 453–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharya, U., Holden, C., & Jacobsen, S. (2012). Penny wise, dollar foolish: Buy-sell imbalances on and around round numbers. Management Science, 58(2), 413–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black, R., & Diaz, J. (1996). The use of information versus asking price in the real property negotiation process. Journal of Property Research, 13(4), 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deng, Y., Gabriel, S., Nishimura, K., & Zheng, D. (2013). Optimal pricing strategy in the case of price dispersion: new evidence from Tokyo housing market. Real Estate Economics, 40(5), forthcoming.Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, L. (1967). In A. Phillips & O. E. Williamson (Eds.), Psychological pricing in the food industry, in prices: Issues in theory, practice, and public policy (pp. 187–201). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gendall, P., Holdershaw, J., & Garland, R. (1997). The effect of odd pricing on demand. European Journal of Marketing, 31(11/12), 799–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilmour, J. (1985). One cent less doesn’t make sense. Australian Business, March 20, 34.Google Scholar
  11. Haurin, D. (1988). The duration of marketing time of residential housing. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 16(4), 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haurin, D., Haurin, J., Nadauld, T., & Sanders, A. (2010). List prices, sale prices, and marketing time: an application to U.S. housing markets. Real Estate Economics, 38(4), 659–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hogl, S. (1988). The effects of simulated price changes on consumers in a retail environment-price thresholds and price policy. Lisbon: Esomar Congress Proceedings.Google Scholar
  14. Holdershaw, J., Gendall, P., & Garland, R. (1997). The widespread use of odd pricing in the retail sector. Marketing Bulletin, 8(1), 53–58.Google Scholar
  15. Horowitz, J. (1992). The role of list price in housing markets: theory and an econometric model. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7(2), 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knight, J., Sirmans, C., & Turnbull, G. (1994). List price signaling and buyer behavior in the housing market. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 9(3), 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller, N., & Sklarz, M. (1987). Pricing strategies and residential property selling prices. Journal of Real Estate Research, 2(1), 31–40.Google Scholar
  18. Northcraft, G., & Neale, M. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: an anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(1), 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Palmon, O., Smith, B., & Sopranzetti, B. (2004). Clustering in real estate prices: determinants and consequences. Journal of Real Estate Research, 26(2), 115–136.Google Scholar
  20. Rudolph, H. (1954). Pricing for today’s market. Printers Ink, 28, 22–24.Google Scholar
  21. Schindler, R., & Kibarian, T. (1996). Increased consumer sales response through use of 99-ending prices. Journal of Retailing, 72(2), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schindler, R., & Kirby, P. (1997). Patterns of rightmost digits used in advertised prices: implications for nine-ending effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schindler, R., & Wiman, A. (1989). Effects of odd pricing on price recall. Journal of Business Research, 19(4), 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seiler, M., Seiler, V., Traub, S., & Harrison, D. (2008). Regret aversion and false reference points in residential real estate. Journal of Real Estate Research, 30(4), 461–474.Google Scholar
  25. Seiler, M., Madhavan, P., & Liechty, M. (2012). Toward an understanding of real estate homebuyer internet search behavior: an application of ocular tracking technology. Journal of Real Estate Research, 34(2), 211–241.Google Scholar
  26. Stiving, M., & Winer, R. (1997). An empirical analysis of price endings with scanner data. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yavas, A., & Yang, S. (1995). The strategic role of listing price in marketing real estate: theory and evidence. Real Estate Economics, 23(3), 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and FinanceUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA
  2. 2.The College of William & MaryWilliamsburgUSA

Personalised recommendations