This study examines the home seller’s brokerage services decision, comparing full-service brokerage and limited-service arrangements. A model is developed which considers seller motivation and availability of effort, along with the cost of brokerage services, broker productivity and market dynamics as factors of influence in this decision. Limited-service arrangements are found to have a significant impact on price and marketing time. The popularity of limited-service arrangements is strongly influenced by the total dollar cost of brokerage services, which, in turn, is determined by housing market conditions.
Limited-service Brokerage Principal-agent
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Anglin, P. M. & Arnott, R. (1991). Residential real estate brokerage as a principal-agent problem. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4, 99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anglin, P. M., Rutherford, R. C., & Springer, T. M. (2003). The trade-off between selling price of residential properties and time-on-the-market: the impact of price setting. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 26, 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, M. A. (1992). The principal-agent relationship in real estate brokerage services. Real Estate Economics, 20, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, J. D. & Chinloy, P. T. (2000). Pricing, exposure, and residential listing strategies. Journal of Real Estate Research, 20, 61–74.Google Scholar
Benjamin, J. D., Jud, G. D., & Sirmans, G. S. (2000). What do we know about real estate brokerage? Journal of Real Estate Research, 20, 5–30.Google Scholar
Cubbin, J. S. (1974). Price, quality, and selling time in the housing market. Applied Economics, 6, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, H. W., Zumpano, L. V., & Baryla, E. A. (2000). Buyer brokers: do they make a difference? their influence on selling price and search duration. Real Estate Economics, 28, 337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, L. M. & Yavaş, A. (2009). A case for percentage commission contracts: the impact of a “race” among agents. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, doi:10.1007/s11146-008-9139-x.Google Scholar
Han, L., Hong, S. (2009). Testing cost inefficiency under free entry in the real estate brokerage industry. Working paper, November 9, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1205678.
Hsieh, C. & Moretti, E. (2003). Can free entry be inefficient? fixed commissions and social waste in the real estate industry. Journal of Political Economy, 111, 1076–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K. H., Springer, T. M., & Brockman, C. M. (2005). Price effects of non-traditionally broker-marketed properties. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 31, 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jud, G. D., Seeks, T. G., & Winkler, D. T. (1996). Time-on-the-market: the impact of residential brokerage. Journal of Real Estate Research, 12, 447–458.Google Scholar
Knight, J. R. (2002). Listing price, time on market, and ultimate selling price: causes and effects. Real Estate Economics, 30, 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megbolugbe, I. F., Marks, A. P., & Schwartz, M. B. (1991). The economic theory of housing demand: a critical review. Journal of Real Estate Research, 6, 381–393.Google Scholar
Miller, N. G. (1978). Time on the market and selling price. Real Estate Economics, 6, 164–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munneke, H. J. & Yavaş, A. (2001). Incentives and performance in real estate brokerage. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 22, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar