Skip to main content
Log in

Stickiness of Rental Rates and Developers’ Option Exercise Strategies

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we incorporate sticky rents into a real options model to rationalize the widely documented overbuilding puzzle in real estate markets. Given the assumption that developers’ objective function is to maximize total revenue by selecting an optimal occupancy level, our model provides a better explanation of the phenomena we observed in the real world than the traditional market-clearance based real options models. We also show that developers’ exercise strategies can be affected by the size and the type of property markets. In other words, developers’ exercise strategies could differ among markets and under different conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abreu, D., Dutta, P. K., & Smith, L. (1994). The folk theorem for repeated games: A NEU condition. Econometrica, 62, 939–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. J. (1959). Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. In R. D. Luce & A. W. Tucker (Eds.), Contributions to the theory of games IV, annals of mathematical study, 40, pp. 287–324. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. J. (1960). Acceptable points in games of perfect information. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 10, 381–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. J. (1981). Survey of repeated games, in essays in game theory and mathematical economics in honor of Oskar Morgenstern, pp. 11–42. Mannheim/Wein/Zurich: Bibliographisches Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, E., & Goodman, Jr., J. L. (1996). Explaining the vacancy rate-rent paradox of the 1980s. Journal of Real Estate Research, 11(3), 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackley, D. M., & Follain, J. R. (1996). In search of empirical evidence that links renmt and user cost. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, 409–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M. J., & Schwartz, E. S. (1980). Analyzing convertible bonds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 15(4), 907–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. C., & Ross, S. A. (1976). The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 371–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press: New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fickes, M. (2001). The state of hotel development: it’s on the decline, but that’s good. National Real Estate Investor, 43(5), 118–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1971). A noncooperative equilibrium for supergames. Review of Economic Studies, 38, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., & Maskin, E. (1986). The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting and with incomplete information. Econometrica, 54, 533–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, S. A., & Nofhaft, F. E. (1988). Rental housing markets and the natural vacancy rate. AREUEA Journal, 16(4), 419–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenadier, S. R. (1995). Valuing lease contracts: A real-option approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 38, 297–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenadier, S. R. (1996). The strategic exercise of options: Development cascades and overbuilding in real estate. Journal of Finance, 51, 1653–1679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. M., & Kreps, D. M. (1979). Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod securities markets. Journal of Economic Theory, 20, 381–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendershott, P. H. (2000). Property asset bubbles: Evidence from the sydney office market. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 20(1), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (1998). New development: Where to from here? National Real Estate Investor, 40(5), 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jud, G. D., & Frew, J. (1990). Atypicality and the natural vacancy rate hypothesis. AREUEA Journal, 18(3), 294–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, I. J., Ramaswamy, K., & Sundaresan, S. (1993). Does default risk in coupons affect the valuation of corporate bonds? A contingent claims model. Financial Management, 22, 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., & Wilson, R. (1982). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kummerow, M. (1999). A system dynamics model of cyclical office oversupply. Journal of Real Estate Research, 18(1), 233–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lereah, D. (2004). Economic and commercial real estate market outlook. National Association of Realtors.

  • Martzoukos, S. H., & Trigeorgis, L. (2002). Real (Investment) options with multiple sources of rare events. European Journal of Operational Research, 136(3), 696–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAneny, D., Han, J., & Gallagher, M. (2001). A cautiously optimistic outlook. Mortgage Banking, 61(5), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4, 141–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C. (1975). An asymptotic theory of growth under uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies, 42, 375–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, G. R. (1999). Real estate rental growth rates at different points in the physical market cycle. Journal of Real Estate Research, 18(1), 131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, A. (1999). Cooperation in repeated games when the number of stages in not commonly known. Econometrica, 67, 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Øksendal, B. (1998). Stochastic differential equations: An introduction with applications (5th edition). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagliari Jr., J. L., & Webb, J. R. (1996). On setting apartment rental rates: A regression-based approach. Journal of Real Estate Research, 12(1), 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radner, R. (1980). Collusive behavior in non-cooperative Epsilon-Equilibria in oligopolies with long but finite lives. Journal of Economic Theory, 22, 136–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, C. (1988). Advertising and natural vacancies in rental housing markets. AREUEA Journal, 16(4), 354–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddiough, T. J. (1997). The economic consequences of regulatory taking risk on land value and development activity. Journal of Urban Economics, 41, 56–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titman, S. (1985). Urban land prices under uncertainty. American Economic Review, 75, 505–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., & Zhou, Y. (2000). Overbuilding: A game-theoretic approach. Real Estate Economics, 28(3), 493–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., & Zhou, Y. (2006). Equilibrium real options exercise strategies with multiple players: The case of real estate markets. Real Estate Economics, 34(1), 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. T. (1991). Real estate development as an option. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4, 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. T. (1993). Equilibrium and options on real assets. Review of Financial Studies, 6, 825–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rose Neng Lai.

Additional information

Submitted to Cambridge—Maastricht 2005 Symposium.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lai, R.N., Wang, K. & Yang, J. Stickiness of Rental Rates and Developers’ Option Exercise Strategies. J Real Estate Finan Econ 34, 159–188 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-007-9004-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-007-9004-3

Keywords

Navigation