Advertisement

The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 329–344 | Cite as

The Q Theory and the Swedish Housing Market—An Empirical Test

  • Lennart Berg
  • Tommy Berger
Article

Abstract

We argue that major changes in economic policy have resulted in a more market driven demand for housing investment in Sweden, due to policy changes at the end of the 1980s and the beginning of the 1990s. Tobin’s transparent Q theory is the investment theory used. For the last period of the sample (1993–2003 quarterly data), our results indicate that there exists a high degree of correlation between the Q ratio and the (logarithm of) two different variables for housing investment. An error correction regression model, controlling for structural breaks, also indicates that a stable long-run relationship could be detected for the logarithm of building starts and the Q ratio between 1993–2003, but not between 1981–1992.

Key words

Tobin’s Q Housing investment Error correction model Structural break 

JEL Classifications

E22 R21 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agell, J., & Berg, L. (1996). Does financial deregulation cause the Swedish consumption boom? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 98(4), 579–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agell, J., Englund, P., & Södersten, J. (1998). Incentives and the redistribution in the welfare state. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Barrot, B. (2003). Empirical studies in consumption, house prices and the accuracy of European growth and inflation, Economic Studies 77. Department of Economics, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
  4. Berg, L. (2002). Prices on the second-hand market for Swedish family houses—Correlation, causation and determinants. European Journal of Housing Policy, 2(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg, L. (2005). Price indexes for multi-dwelling buildings in Sweden. Journal of Real Estate Research, 27(1), 47–81.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, T. (1998). Priser på egenskaper hos småhus, Arbetsrapport 14, Institutet för bostads- och urbanforskning, Gävle.Google Scholar
  7. Berger, T. (2000). Tobins q på småhusmarknaden. In T. Lindh (Ed.), Prisbildning och värdering av fastigheter. Institutet för bostads- och urbanforskning, Gävle.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, T., Englund, P., Hendershott, P. H., & Turner, B. (2000). The capitalization of interest subsidies: Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 32(2), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, R., Durbin, J., & Evans, J. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationship over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society series B, 37, 149–172.Google Scholar
  10. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Englund, P. (1999). The Swedish banking crisis: Roots and consequences. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 15(3), 80–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Englund, P., Hendershott, P. H., & Turner, B. (1995). The tax reform and the housing market. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 2(3), 19–56.Google Scholar
  13. EViews 5 User Guide (2004). Quantitative Micro Software, LLC.Google Scholar
  14. Green, W. H. (1997). Econometric analysis, third edition. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Hayashi, F. (1982). Tobin’s marginal q and average q: A neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica, 50, 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jaffee, D. M. (1994). Den svenska fastighetskrisen (The Swedish Real Estate Crisis). Stockholm: SNS Förlag.Google Scholar
  17. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Johansen, S., Mosconi, R., & Nielsen, B. (2000). Cointegration analysis in the presence of structural breaks in the deterministic trend. Econometric Journal, 3, 216–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jud, G. D., & Winkler, D. T. (2003). The Q theory of housing investment. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 27(3), 379–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Petterson, K. (2000). An introduction to applied econometrics: A time series approach. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  22. Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. (1988). Variable trends in economic time series. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 147–174.Google Scholar
  23. Takala, K., & Tuomala, M. (1990). Housing investment in Finland. Finnish Economic Papers, 3(1), 41–53.Google Scholar
  24. Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money Credit, and Banking, 3(1), 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Turner, B., & Whitehead, M. E. (2002). Reducing housing subsidy: Swedish housing policy in an international context. Urban Studies, 39(2), 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.The Institute for Housing and Urban ResearchUppsala UniversityGävleSweden

Personalised recommendations