Corporate Real Estate Ownership Implications: International Performance Evidence

  • Dirk Brounen
  • Piet M. A. Eichholtz
Original Article


In this paper we explore corporate real estate ownership internationally. Based on a sample of 4,636 companies from 18 industries and 9 countries we document distinct patterns and trends in the corporate ownership level of real estate. Real estate ownership appears to be driven by industrial rather than national differences, with corporate real estate ratios ranging between 0.13 for Business Services and 0.63 for the Mining sector. Overall, real estate ownership appears to be decreasing over time, which may be due to the gaining popularity of lease alternatives. When analyzing the stock performance of the companies in our sample, we discover a significantly negative relationship between real estate ownership and a firm’s systematic risk. Idiosyncratic risk bears no significant relationship with real estate ownership. With respect to stock returns our results show that returns are lowest among firms with the highest real estate ownership levels in each industry. After controlling for the variation in risks, the remaining return patterns differ strongly across industries, with a significantly negative relationship between stock outperformance and real estate ownership for Communications and Business Services and a positive but not significant relationship for Transportation.

Key Words

corporate real estate firm performance systematic risk 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ambrose, W. B. (1990). “Corporate Real Estate’s Impact on the Takeover Market,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 3(4), 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arthur Anderson & Company. (1993). Real Estate in the Corporation: The Bottom Line from Senior Management. San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Ciochetti, B. A., and J. D. Shilling. (2002). “The Disappearance of the Small Stock Premium and the Emergence of an Equity Premium on Large Firms,” Working Paper.Google Scholar
  4. Deng, Y., and J. Gyourko. (1999). “Real Estate Ownership by Non-Real Estate Firms: An Estimate of the Impact on Firm Returns,” Unpublished Working Paper, Wharton School.Google Scholar
  5. DTZ. (2003). Money Into Property-Europe, The Netherlands: AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  6. Glascock, J., W. Davidson, and C. F. Sirmans. (1989). “An Analysis of the Disposition and Acquisition of Real Estate Assets,” Journal of Real Estate Research 4(3), 131–140.Google Scholar
  7. Glascock, J., W. Davidson, and C. F. Sirmans. (1991). “The Gains From Corporate Selloffs: The Case of Real Estate Assets,” AREUEA Journal 19(4), 567–582.Google Scholar
  8. IPD. (2003a). IPD Germany Index 2002.Google Scholar
  9. IPD. (2003b). IPD France Index 2002.Google Scholar
  10. IPD. (2003c). IPD United Kingdom Index 2002.Google Scholar
  11. Krumm, P. J. M. M., and P. Linneman. (2001). “Corporate Real Estate Management,” Wharton Working Paper #370.Google Scholar
  12. Manning, C. (1991). “Leasing Versus Purchase of Corporate Real Property: Leases with Residual Equity Interests,” Journal of Real Estate Research 6(1), 79–85.Google Scholar
  13. Myer, F. C., L. He, and J. R. Webb. (1992). “Sell-Offs of U.S. Real Estate: The Effect of Domestic versus Foreign Buyers of Shareholder Wealth,” AREUEA Journal 20(3), 487–500.Google Scholar
  14. Rodriguez, M., and C. F. Sirmans. (1996). “Managing Corporate Real Estate: Evidence from Capital Markets,” Journal of Real Estate Literature 4(1), 13–36.Google Scholar
  15. Rutherford, R. C. (1990). “Empirical Evidence on Shareholder Value and the Sale-Leaseback of Corporate Real Estate,” AREUEA Journal 18(4), 522–529.Google Scholar
  16. Seiler, S. J., A. Chantrath, and J. R. Webb. (2001). “Real Estate Ownership and the Risk and Return to Stockholders,” Journal of Real Estate Research 22(1), 199–212.Google Scholar
  17. Slovin, M. B., M. E. Sushka, and J. A. Polonchek. (1990). “Corporate Sales-and-Leaseback and Shareholder Wealth,” Journal of Finance 45(1), 289–299.Google Scholar
  18. Veale, P. (1989). “Managing Corporate Real Estate: Current Executive Attitudes and Prospects for an Emergent Management Discipline,” Journal of Real Estate Research 4(3), 1–22.Google Scholar
  19. Zeckhauser, S., and Silverman, R. (1983). “Rediscover Your Company’s Real Estate,” Harvard Business Review 61(1), 111–117.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of Maastricht RotterdamMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations