Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of ideal and ought-to L2 selves on Korean EFL learners’ writing strategy use and writing quality

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite awareness of the important role of motivation in second/foreign language (L2) learning, a thorough investigation into the motivational influence on the L2 writing processes and products has been neglected. In an attempt to fill this research gap, the present study explored the effects of different types of L2 self-related motivation (ideal and ought-to L2 selves) drawn from the theory of the L2 motivational self system (Dörnyei, 2005) on writing strategy use and writing quality. Sixty-eight Korean undergraduates with a low level of overall English proficiency responded to questionnaires designed to measure their ideal and ought-to L2 selves and writing strategy use. They also completed a descriptive composition task aimed at assessing their writing quality. Regression analyses revealed that the ideal L2 self had a significant positive effect on both planning strategy use and writing outcomes, whereas the ought-to L2 self was merely correlated with revising strategy use. This study provides some empirical support for the potential of an idealized future L2 self-image to become a major determinant of writing processes and products. The results are discussed with reference to a promotion/prevention focus and a sensitivity of the ideal and ought-to L2 selves to positive/negative learning outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderman, E. M. (1992, 12). Motivation and cognitive strategy use in reading and writing. The annual meeting of the national reading conference, San Antonio, TX.

  • Chae, S-E. (2011). Contributions of prior knowledge, motivation, strategies to Korean college students’ L2 writing development. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.

  • Cho, M. (2015). The effects of working possible selves on second language performance. Reading and Writing, 28(8), 1099–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csizér, K., & Kormos, J. (2009). Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behavior: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csizér, K., & Lukács, G. (2010). The comparative analysis of motivation, attitudes and selves: The case of English and German in Hungary. System, 38, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csizér, K., & Tankó, G. (2015). English majors’ self-regulatory control strategy use in academic writing and its relation to L2 motivation. Applied Linguistics, 38(3), 386–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., & Chan, L. (2013). Motivation and vision: An analysis of future L2 self images, sensory styles, and imagery capacity across two target languages. Language Learning, 63, 437–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2009). Motivation, language identities and the L2 self: Future research directions. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 350–356). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Bianco, A. T. (2003). Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance. Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(1), 148–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. C. (2001). Integrative motivation and second language acquisition. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 1–20). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A student’s contributions to second-language learning. Part II: Affective variables. Language Teaching, 26, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, D., & Woldemariam, G. S. (2011). The influence of motivation and attitude on writing strategy use of undergraduate EFL students: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Asian EFL Journal, 13(2), 34–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemian, M., & Heidari, A. (2013). The relationship between L2 learners’ motivation/attitude and success in L2 writing. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 476–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, T.-H. (2005). Effects of mastery and performance goals on the composition strategy use of adult EFL writers. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 407–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, S. (1995). Objective measurement of low-proficiency EFL narrative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(1), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M., Lamb, M., & Chambers, G. (2013). The L2 motivational self system and national interest: A Pakistani perspective. System, 41, 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jong, Y. (2012). Korean students’ perspectives on and use of strategies in English critical writing. English Language Teaching, 24(2), 75–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, E-h, & Kim, S.-H. (2003). A study on the motivating factors and the strategy use by different levels of middle school students. Foreign Languages Education, 10(2), 227–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J. Y. (2005). Written narratives as an index of L2 competence in Korean EFL learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaldieh, S. A. (2000). Learning strategies and writing processes of proficient vs. less-proficient learners of Arabic. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 522–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kormos, J. (2011). Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 148–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kormos, J. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 390–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M. (2012). A self-system perspective on young adolescents’ motivation to learn English in urban and rural settings. Language Learning, 62, 997–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.-W. (2002). A study on the relationships between attitudes, motivation, and strategies in learning English. The Journal of English Language Teaching, 14(1), 189–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.-B. (2005). An investigation into the effects of integrative and instrumental orientations on language learning strategies. English Language & Literature Teaching, 11(1), 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, P. D., Mackinnon, S. P., & Clément, R. (2009). The baby, the bathwater, and the future of language learning motivation research. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 43–65). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, P. D., & Noels, K. A. (1996). Using social-psychological variables to predict the use of language learning strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 373–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every good teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pae, T.-I. (2009). L2 motivation and writing performance by proficiency level: A process approach to motivation. English Language Teaching, 21(3), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papi, M. (2010). The L2 motivational self system, L2 anxiety, and motivated behavior: A structural equation modeling approach. System, 38, 467–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papi, M. (2016). Motivation and learning interface: How regulatory fit affects incidental vocabulary learning and task experience. Ph.D. thesis, Michigan State University, United States.

  • Papi, M., & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2012). Teacher motivational practice, student motivation, and possible L2 selves: An examination in the Iranian EFL context. Language Learning, 62, 571–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papi, M., & Teimouri, Y. (2012). Dynamics of selves and motivation: A cross-sectional study in the EFL context of Iran. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22, 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papi, M., & Teimouri, Y. (2014). Language learner motivational types: A cluster analysis study. Language Learning, 64, 493–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrić, B., & Czárl, B. (2003). Validating a writing strategy questionnaire. System, 31, 187–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R., & Watanabe, Y. (2001). Motivation, strategy use, and pedagogical preferences in foreign language learning. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 313–359). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, T., Magid, M., & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self system amongst Chinese, Japanese, and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66–97). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Teimouri, Y. (2017). L2 selves, emotions, and motivated behaviors. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 681–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The International English Language Testing System. (1992). IELTS general training writing [writing task 2: Band descriptors]. Retrieved March 20, 2018 from https://www.ielts.org/-/media/pdfs/writing-band-descriptors-task-2.ashx?la=en.

  • Tseng, W.-T., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 78–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2011). Task type as a moderator of positive/negative feedback effects on motivation and performance: A regulatory focus perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(8), 1084–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness, and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26, 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, L., & Papi, M. (2017). Motivation and feedback: How implicit theories of intelligence predict L2 writers’ motivation and feedback orientation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wi, H. J., & Joh, J. S. (2010). The relationships among English learning motivation, learning strategy, and English achievement: A study of Korean high school students. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 10(4), 807–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, E.-M. (2011). Korean college students’ English learning motivation and listening proficiency. English Language & Literature Teaching, 17(2), 93–114.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junkyu Lee.

Additional information

This work was supported by Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jang, Y., Lee, J. The effects of ideal and ought-to L2 selves on Korean EFL learners’ writing strategy use and writing quality. Read Writ 32, 1129–1148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9903-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9903-0

Keywords

Navigation