Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 1231–1247 | Cite as

The apple doesn’t fall from the tree: parents’ reading-related knowledge and children’s reading outcomes

  • Aviva Segal
  • Sandra Martin-Chang
Article

Abstract

This study investigated parents’ reading-related knowledge and its association with children’s reading outcomes. Forty-two parent–child dyads were assessed when children were in Kindergarten and 39 of the children were followed the subsequent year. Reading measures were administered in Kindergarten. In Grade 1, children received reading and arithmetic measures. Parents completed a questionnaire involving (general) cultural knowledge, print exposure, and reading-related knowledge associated with the identification of regular and irregular word spellings. All parent variables accounted for unique variance in children’s reading scores in Kindergarten, however, only parents’ reading-related knowledge continued to do so into Grade 1. Our findings are consistent with the research conducted with teachers underlining the association between reading-related knowledge and students’ reading performances. The current study contributes to the limited literature focusing on parents’ reading related knowledge. The data presented here suggest that parental reading-related knowledge is associated with children’s reading outcomes in both Kindergarten and Grade 1.

Keywords

Explicit instruction Home literacy environment Reading outcomes Reading-related knowledge 

References

  1. Aram, D., Korat, O., Saiegh-Haddad, E., Arafat, S. H., Khoury, R., & Elhija, J. A. (2013). Early literacy among Arabic-speaking kindergartners: The role of socioeconomic status, home literacy environment and maternal mediation of writing. Cognitive Development, 28, 193–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arya, D. J., McClung, N. A., Maul, A., & Cunningham, A. (2014). The effect of early home literacy environments on fourth-grade literacy achievement: An international comparison. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 2, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJQRE.2014.060971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachu, A. (1991). Fertility of American women. Current Population Reports, Series P 20, no. 454. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, L., Scher, D., & Mackler, K. (1997). Home and family influences on motivations for reading. Educational Psychologist, 32, 69–82.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3202_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bus, A., & van Ijendoorn, M. (1988). Mother–child interaction, attachment, and emergent literacy. Child Development, 59, 1262–1272.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1130489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne, B., Samuellson, S., Wadsworth, S., Hulslander, J., Corley, R., DeFries, J. C., et al. (2007). Longitudinal twin study early literacy development: Preschool through Grade 1. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 77–102.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9019-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cligenpeel, B. T., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). Mothers’ sensitivity and book-reading interactions with first graders. Early Education and Development, 18, 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1040928070127434510.13140/RG.2.1.2560.6567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, R. A., Mather, N., Schneider, D. A., & White, J. M. (2017). A comparison of schools: Teacher knowledge of explicit code-based reading instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30, 653–690.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9694-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham, A., Perry, K., Stanovich, K., & Stanovich, P. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 139–167.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-004-0007-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cunningham, A., & Ryan O’Donnell, C. (2015). Teacher knowledge in early literacy. In Alexander Pollatsek & Rebecca Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 447–462). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cunningham, A., & Stanovich, K. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934–945.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dumont, H., Trautwein, U., Nagy, G., & Nagengast, B. (2014). Quality of parental homework involvement: Predictors and reciprocal relations with academic functioning in the reading domain. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 144–161.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans, M. A., Fox, M., Cremaso, L., & McKinnon, L. (2004). Beginning reading: The views of parents and teachers of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 130–141.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93–99.  https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haars, M., & Haars, S. (1998). Random.org. Retrieved from https://www.random.org/lists/. Accessed 19 Feb 2018.
  17. Hammer, C. S., Farkas, G., & Maczuga, S. (2010). The language and literacy development of head start children: A study using the family and child experiences survey database. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 70–83.  https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelcey, B. (2011). Assessing the effects of teachers’ reading knowledge on students’ achievement using multilevel propensity score stratification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 458–482.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711415262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim, S., Im, H., & Kwon, K. (2015). The role of home literacy environment in toddlerhood in development of vocabulary and decoding skills. Child & Youth Care Forum, 44, 835–852.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-015-9309-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ladd, M., Martin-Chang, S., & Levesque, K. (2011). Parents' RRK and children's reading acquisition. Annals of Dyslexia, 61, 201–222.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-011-0053-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin-Chang, S. L., & Gould, O. N. (2008). Revisiting print exposure: Exploring differential links to vocabulary, comprehension and reading rate. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 273–284.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00371.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCutchen, D., Abbott, R. D., Green, L. B., Beretvas, N., Cox, S., Potter, N. S., et al. (2002). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 69–86.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meng, X., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172–175.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyer, L. A., Stahl, S. A., Wardrop, J. L., & Linn, R. L. (1994). Effects of reading storybooks aloud to children. The Journal of Educational Research, 88, 69–85.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1994.9944821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moats, L. C. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81–102.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moats, L. C., & Foorman, B. R. (2003). Measuring teachers’ content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 23–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-003-0003-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mol, S., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 267–296.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Institutes of Health. (1994). Safe to sleep campaign. Bethesda, MD. Retrieved from https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sts/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 10 Sept 2013.
  29. Ocal, T., & Ehri, L. (2017). Spelling ability in college students predicted by decoding, print exposure, and vocabulary. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 47, 58–74.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2016.1219242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olson, R. K., Keenan, J. M., Byrne, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2014). Why do children differ in their development of reading and related skills? Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 38–54.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.800521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ouellette, G., & Sénéchal, M. (2017). Invented spelling in kindergarten as a predictor of reading and spelling in Grade 1: A new pathway to literacy, or just the same road, less known? Developmental Psychology, 53, 77–88.  https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Piasta, S. B., Connor, C. M., Fishman, B. J., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Teachers’ knowledge of literacy concepts, classroom practices, and student reading growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 224–248.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430902851364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reading Rockets. (2008). About reading rockets. Retrieved from http://www.readingrockets.org/about. Accesssed 20 Nov 2017.
  34. Schmitt, S. A., Simpson, A. M., & Friend, M. (2011). A longitudinal assessment of the home literacy environment and early language. Infant and Child Development, 20, 409–431.  https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Technical abstract (Woodcock-Johnson III Assessment Service Bulletin No. 2). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73, 445–460.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2014). Continuity and change in the home literacy environment as predictors of growth in vocabulary and reading. Child Development, 85, 1552–1568.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sheridan, S. M., Knoche, L. L., Kupzyk, K. A., Pope Edwards, C., & Marvin, C. A. (2011). A randomized trial examining the effects of parent engagement on early language and literacy: Getting ready intervention. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 361–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sonnenschein, S., & Sun, S. (2016). Racial/ethnic difference in kindergartners’ reading and math skills: Parents’ knowledge of children’s development and home-based activities as mediators. Infant and Child Development, 31, 3920–3929.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.118.Google Scholar
  40. Soodia, P., Jogi, A. L., & Kikas, E. (2016). Relationships between teachers’ metacognitive knowledge and students’ metacognitive knowledge and reading achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, On-line First Posting.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0293-x.Google Scholar
  41. Sparks, R. L., Patton, J., & Murdoch, A. (2014). Early reading success and its relationship to reading achievement and reading volume: Replication of ‘10 years later’. Reading and Writing, 27, 189–211.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9439-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, P. (2003). Teachers’ acquisition of knowledge about English word structure. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 72–103.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-003-0005-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, P. (2004). Preparing novice teachers to develop basic reading and spelling skills in children. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 332–359.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-004-0016-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spear-Swerling, L., & Cheesman, E. (2012). Teachers’ knowledge base for implementing response-to-intervention models in reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1691–1723.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9338-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spear-Swerling, L., & Zibulsky, J. (2014). Making time for literacy: Teacher knowledge and time allocation in instructional planning. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1353–1378.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9491-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 211–229.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, J., & Schatschneider, C. (2010). Genetic influence on literacy constructs in kindergarten and first grade: Evidence from a diverse twin sample. Behavior Genetics, 40, 591–602.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-010-9368-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. The National Reading Plan. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.nationalreadingcampaign.ca. Accessed 10 Sept 2013.
  49. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Washburn, E., Binks-Cantrell, E., Joshi, M., Martin-Chang, S., & Arrow, A. (2016). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of basic language constructs in Canada, England, New Zealand, and the USA. Annals of Dyslexia, 66, 7–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-015-0115-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E., & Mitchell, H. R. (1993). Reading in the real world and its correlates. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 34–50.  https://doi.org/10.2307/747815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Woodcock, R., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Chicago, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations