Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early contribution of morphological awareness to literacy skills across languages varying in orthographic consistency

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, we examined the role of morphological awareness in reading and spelling performance across three languages varying in orthographic consistency (English, French, and Greek), after controlling for the effects of phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming (RAN). One hundred fifty-nine English-speaking Canadian, 238 French-speaking Canadian, and 224 Greek children were assessed at the beginning of Grade 2 on measures of morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and RAN. At the end of Grade 2, they were assessed on reading accuracy, reading fluency, reading comprehension, and spelling to dictation. The results indicated that morphological awareness was a unique predictor of reading comprehension and spelling in all three languages, of reading fluency in English and French, and of reading accuracy in English only. Furthermore, the results of multigroup analyses revealed no significant differences in the contribution of morphological awareness to the literacy outcomes across languages. Theoretical and practical implications of these finding are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A common estimate of orthographic transparency is the entropy index based on letter-to-sound mappings. The lower the entropy index is the more transparent the orthography is. The estimate of this index is .83 for English, .46 for French (Ziegler et al., 2010), and .16 for Greek (Protopapas & Vlachou, 2009).

  2. The negative variance of the first indicator of the reading accuracy latent variable had to be fixed at 0 in the French group, thus resulting in a model with 47 degrees of freedom. This constraint did not result in a significant decrement in the model fit and it was deemed necessary to ensure the identification of the measurement model.

  3. The fit of this model was identical to the measurement model because it estimated all relationships between the predictors and the outcomes. However, as in a multiple regression, this model estimated the effect of a predictor when holding constant the effect of the other predictors.

  4. We calculated the change in R² to estimate the unique/incremental variance explained by morphological awareness. We tested a first model in which the effects of the covariates were freely estimated but the effect of morphological awareness was fixed to zero (i.e., equivalent to the first step in a hierarchical regression). We tested a second model (equivalent to the second step of a hierarchical regression) in which both the effects of the covariates and morphological awareness were freely estimated. Therefore, the unique/incremental variance explained by morphological awareness (R² change) is obtained with this formula: R² of model 2 minus R² of model 1. Results of the second model are presented in Tables 4 and 5. All results from the first model are available upon request.

  5. The fit of this model corresponds to the sum of MLRχ 2 for the model previously estimated in each of the three language groups.

References

  • Angelelli, P., Marinelli, C. V., & Burani, C. (2014). The effect of morphology on spelling and reading accuracy: A study on Italian children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anglin, J. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, 1–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Nagy, W., & Carlisle, J. (2010). Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in Grade 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 141–163. doi:10.1007/s10936-009-9130-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthiaume, R., Besse, A.-S., & Daigle, D. (2010). L’évaluation de la conscience morphologique: proposition d’une typologie des tâches. Language Awareness, 19, 153–170. doi:10.1080/09658416.2010.482992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booij, G. (2012). The grammar of words: An introduction to linguistic morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P., Nunes, T., & Aidinis, A. (1999). Different morphemes, same spelling problems: Cross-linguistic developmental studies. In M. Harris & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write (pp. 112–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P., Nunes, T., & Bindman, M. (2000). The relations between children’s linguistic awareness and spelling: The case of the apostrophe. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 253–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Defior, S., Seidlová Málková, G., & Hulme, C. (2013). Different patterns, but equivalent predictors, of growth in reading in consistent and inconsistent orthographies. Psychological Science, 24, 1398–1407. doi:10.1177/0956797612473122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C., Litavský, M., Onochie-Quintanilla, E., et al. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23, 678–686. doi:10.1177/0956797611434536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary grades. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., & Nomanbhoy, D. M. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177–195. doi:10.1017/S0142716400009541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casalis, S., Deacon, S. H., & Pacton, S. (2011). How specific is the connection between morphological awareness and spelling? A study of French children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 499–511. doi:10.1017/S014271641100018X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexandre, M.-F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 303–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chliounaki, K., & Bryant, P. (2007). How children learn about morphological spelling rules. Child Development, 78, 1360–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, G. G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corporation, E. (2012). DirectRT research software (v2012). New York: Empirisoft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. J., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Early predictors of phonological and morphological awareness and the link with reading: Evidence from children with different patterns of early deficit. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 509–531. doi:10.1017/S0142716413000295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S. H. (2012). Sounds, letters and meanings: The independent influences of phonological, morphological and orthographic skills on early word reading accuracy. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 456–475. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010D.0E1A4C9O6.Nx.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238. doi:10.1017.S0124716404001117.

  • Deacon, S. H., Kirby, J. R., & Casselman-Bell, M. (2009). How robust is the contribution of morphological awareness to general spelling outcomes? Reading Psychology, 30, 301–318. doi:10.1080/02702710802412057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S. H., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2008). A review of the evidence on morphological processing in dyslexics and poor readers: A strength or a weakness? In G. Reid, A. Fawcett, F. Manis, & L. Siegel (Eds.), The Sage handbook of dyslexia (pp. 212–237). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S. H., Wade-Woolley, L., & Kirby, J. (2007). Crossover: The role of morphological awareness in French immersion children’s reading. Developmental Psychology, 43, 732–746. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, A. (2012a). ÉCOLE: évaluation de la compétence en lecture. Unpublished test battery, School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Canada.

  • Desrochers, A. (2012b). French adaptation of the Passage Comprehension TestWoodcock (1998). Experimental version, School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Canada.

  • Duncan, L. G., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2009). Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 405. doi:10.1017/S0142716409090213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, G., Manolitsis, G., Nurmi, J.-E., & Parrila, R. (2010). Does task-focused versus task avoidance behavior matter for literacy development in an orthographically consistent language? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, G., Papadopoulos, T. C., Fella, A., & Parrila, R. (2012a). Rapid naming speed components and reading development in a consistent orthography. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2008). Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency in English and Greek: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 566–580. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, G. K., & Stewart, B. (2013). Is rapid automatized naming automatic? Preschool and Primary Education, 1, 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, G. K., Torppa, M., Manolitsis, G., Lyytinen, H., & Parrila, R. (2012b). Longitudinal predictors of reading and spelling across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 25, 321–346. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9271-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigorakis, I. (2014). The development of children’s metamorphological abilities from Kindergarten to Grade 2 and its relationship with reading and spelling acquisition. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece.

  • Grigorakis, I., & Manolitsis, G. (2016). Η συμβολή της μορφολογικής επίγνωσης στα πρώτα στάδια ανάπτυξης της ικανότητας ορθογραφημένης γραφής [The contribution of morphological awareness on the early stages of spelling development]. Preschool and Primary Education, 4, 128–148. doi:10.12681/ppej.8581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, G. R. (2001). Effect size, power, and sample size determinants for structured means modeling and MIMIC approaches to between-groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. Psychometrika, 66, 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holton, D., Mackridge, P., & Philippaki-Warburton, I. (2004). Greek: A comprehensive grammar of the modern language. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalamboukis, T. Z. (1995). Suffix stripping with Modern Greek. Program, 29, 313–321. doi:10.1108/eb047204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Bowers, P. N., Izenberg, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Parrila, R. (2012). Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 389–410. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, L.-J., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41, 161–180. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4103_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, P.-W., & Wu, Q. (2012). Estimation in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 164–180). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lethonen, A., & Bryant, P. (2005). Active players or just passive bystanders? The role of morphemes in spelling development in a transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 137–155. doi:10.1017/s0142716405050113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manolitsis, G. (2006). Η σχέση της μορφολογικής επίγνωσης με την αναγνωστική ικανότητα κατά τα πρώτα στάδια ανάπτυξής της [The relation of morphological awareness with early reading ability]. In D. Koutsogianis, A. Haralabopoulos, & N. Liosis (Eds.), Studies in Greek linguistics. Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting of the Department of Linguistics. Faculty of Philosophy. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (pp. 282–293), Thessaloniki.

  • Manolitsis, G., & Grigorakis, I. (2012). How specific is the role of morphological awareness in beginning reading and spelling? Paper presented at the 19th Conference of Scientific Studies of Reading, 12–14 July, Montreal, Canada.

  • Mouzaki, A., Protopapas, A., Sideridis, G., & Simos, P. (2010). Μια δοκιμασία για την αξιολόγηση της ορθογραφίας [A test for spelling evaluation]. In A. Mouzaki, & A. Protopapas (Eds.), Spelling. Learning & Disorders (pp. 326–347). Athens: Gutenberg.

  • Müller, K., & Brady, S. (2001). Correlates of early reading performance in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 757–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). The number of words in printed school English. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E., Carlisle, J. F., & Goodwin, A. P. (2014). Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 3–12. doi:10.1177/0022219413509967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Aidinis, A., & Bryant, P. (2006). The acquisition of written morphology in Greek. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 201–219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2006). Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33, 637–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, T. C. (2001). Phonological and cognitive correlates of word-reading acquisition under two different instructional approaches in Greek. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 549–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peereman, R., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Messaoud-Galusi, S. (2013). The contribution of morphology to the consistency of spelling-to-sound relations: A quantitative analysis based on French elementary school readers. L’Année Psychologique, 113, 3–33. doi:10.4074/S0003503313001012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittas, E., & Nunes, T. (2014). The relation between morphological awareness and reading and spelling in Greek: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 27, 1507–1527. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9503-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaza, M., & Cohen, H. (2004). Predictive influence of phonological processing, morphological/syntactic skill, and naming speed on spelling. Brain and Language, 55, 368–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protopapas, A., Altani, A., & Georgiou, G. K. (2013). Development of serial processing in reading and rapid naming. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 914–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protopapas, A., & Vlahou, E. (2009). A comparative quantitative analysis of Greek orthographic transparency. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 991–1008. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rispens, J., McBride-Chang, C., & Reitsma, P. (2008). Morphologial awareness and early and advanced word recognition and spelling in Dutch. Reading and Writing, 21, 587–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothou, K. M., & Padeliadu, S. (2015). Inflectional morphological awareness and word reading and reading comprehension in Greek. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1007–1027. doi:10.1017/S0142716414000022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruan, Y., George, G., Song, S., Li, Y., & Shu, H. (2017). Does writing system influence the association between phonological awareness, morphological awareness and reading? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/edu0000216.

  • Sanchez, M., Magnan, A., & Ecalle, J. (2012). Knowledge about word structure in beginning readers: What specific links are there with word reading and spelling? Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 299–317. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0071-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference Chi square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. doi:10.1007/BF02296192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seigneuric, A., Zagar, D., Meunier, F., & Spinelli, E. (2007). The relation between language and cognition in 3- to 9-year olds: The acquisition of grammatical gender in French. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 229–246. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2006.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sénéchal, M. (2000). Morphological effects in children’s spelling of French words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sénéchal, M., Basque, M. T., & Leclaire, T. (2006). Morphological knowledge as revealed in children's spelling accuracy and reports of spelling strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tighe, E. L., & Schatscheider, C. (2015). Exploring the dimensionality of morphological awareness and its relations to vocabulary knowledge in adult basic education students. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 293–311. doi:10.1002/rrq.102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., & Cassar, M. (1996). Effects of morphology on children’s spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 141–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2001). Wechsler individual achievement test—Second edition (WIAT-II). New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2005). Test de rendement individuel de Wechsler (WIAT-II CDN-F). Toronto: Pearson Canada Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, J., Wood, A., & D’zatko, K. W. (2009). The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children. Language, Speech, and Hearing in Schools, 40, 286–298. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery test-revised-normative update examiner’s manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., et al. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21, 551–559. doi:10.1177/0956797610363406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency in spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 504–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. C., & Stone, G. O. (1997). What is the pronunciation of –ough and the spelling for/u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 29, 600–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada grant to the last author (Grant No. RES0002344). We thank all school boards, school principals, teachers, children, and research assistants for their collaboration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain Desrochers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Desrochers, A., Manolitsis, G., Gaudreau, P. et al. Early contribution of morphological awareness to literacy skills across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Read Writ 31, 1695–1719 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9772-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9772-y

Keywords

Navigation