Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 29, Issue 9, pp 1793–1815 | Cite as

The anatomy of the RAN-reading relationship

  • George K. Georgiou
  • Rauno Parrila
  • Timothy C. Papadopoulos
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to contrast three models of the RAN-reading relationship derived from the most prominent theoretical accounts of how RAN is related to reading: the phonological processing, the orthographic processing and the speed of processing accounts. Grade 4 Greek-speaking children (n = 208; 114 girls, 94 boys; mean age = 117.29 months) were administered measures of general cognitive ability, RAN, phonological processing, orthographic processing, speed of processing, and reading fluency. Phonological processing and orthographic processing were assessed with both accuracy and speeded measures. Structural equation modeling showed that the most parsimonious model was one in which RAN predicted reading fluency directly and through orthographic processing. Phonological processing did not predict reading fluency and speed of processing was more important for the RAN-orthographic/phonological processing relationships than for the RAN-reading relationship. Taken together, these findings suggest that what is unique to RAN is more important for the prediction of reading fluency than what it shares with either speed of processing, phonological processing, or orthographic processing.

Keywords

Rapid automatized naming Reading fluency Orthographic processing Phonological processing Speed of processing Greek 

References

  1. Araújo, S., Reis, A., Petersson, K. M., & Faísca, M. (2015). Rapid automatized naming and reading performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 868–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babayiğit, S., & Stainthorp, R. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish. Reading and Writing, 23, 539–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowers, P. G., Steffy, R., & Tate, E. (1988). Comparison of the effects of IQ control methods on memory and naming speed predictors of reading disability. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 304–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowers, P. G., Sunseth, K., & Golden, J. (1999). The route between rapid naming and reading progress. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowers, P. G., & Swanson, L. B. (1991). Naming speed deficits in reading disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowers, P. G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 5, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowey, J. A., McGuigan, M., & Ruschena, A. (2005). On the association between serial naming speed for letters and digits and word-reading skill: Towards a developmental account. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 400–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways in assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Caravolas, M., Vólin, J., & Hulme, C. (2005). Phoneme awareness is a key component of alphabetic literacy skills in consistent and inconsistent orthographies: Evidence from Czech and English children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 107–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Compton, D. L. (2003). Modeling the relationship between growth in rapid naming speed and growth in decoding skill in first-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Compton, D. L., DeFries, J. C., & Olson, R. K. (2001). Are RAN and phonological deficits additive in children with reading disabilities? Dyslexia, 7, 125–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conrad, N. J., & Levy, B. A. (2007). Letter processing and the formation of memory representations in children with naming speed deficits. Reading and Writing, 20, 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cronin, V., & Carver, P. (1998). Phonological sensitivity, rapid naming, and beginning reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cutting, L. E., & Denckla, M. B. (2001). The relationship of rapid serial naming and word reading in normally developing readers: An exploratory model. Reading and Writing, 14, 673–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Jong, P. F. (2011). What discrete and serial rapid automatized naming can reveal about reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 314–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1974). “Rapid automatized naming” of pictured objects, colors, letters, and numbers by normal children. Cortex, 10, 186–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Di Filippo, G., Brizzolara, D., Chilosi, A., De Luca, M., Judica, A., Pecini, C., et al. (2005). Rapid naming, not cancellation speed or articulation rate, predicts reading in an orthographically regular language (Italian). Child Neuropsychology, 11, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frederickson, N., Frith, U., & Reason, R. (1997). Phonological Assessment Battery: Standardisation edition. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  20. Georgas, D. D., Paraskevopoulos, I. N., Bezevegis, I. G., & Giannitsas, N. D. (1997). Ελληνικό WISC-III: Wechsler κλίμακες νοημοσύνης για παιδιά [Greek WISC-III: Wechsler intelligence scale for children]. Athens: Ellinika Grammata.Google Scholar
  21. Georgiou, G., Aro, M., Liao, C.-H., & Parrila, R. (2015). The contribution of RAN pause time and articulation time to reading across languages: Evidence from a more representative sample of children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Georgiou, G., Papadopoulos, T. C., & Kaizer, E. L. (2014). Different RAN components predict reading at different points in time. Reading and Writing, 27, 1379–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Georgiou, G., & Parrila, R. (2013). Rapid naming and reading: A review. In H. L. Swanson, K. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 169–185). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Georgiou, G., Parrila, R., Cui, Y., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2013). Why is rapid automatized naming related to reading? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 218–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Georgiou, G., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. (2009). RAN components and reading development from Grade 3 to Grade 5: What underlies their relationship? Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 508–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Georgiou, G., Parrila, R., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2008). Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency in English and Greek: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 566–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hatzigeorgiu, N., Gavrilidou, M., Piperidis, S., Carayannis, G., Papakostopoulou, A., Spiliotopoulou, A., et al. (2000). Design and implementation of the online ILSP corpus. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference of language resources and evaluation (LREC) (Vol. 3, pp. 1737–1740). Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  28. Holland, J., McIntosh, D., & Huffman, L. (2004). The role of phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming, and orthographic processing in word reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 22, 233–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kail, R., & Hall, L. K. (1994). Speed of processing, naming speed, and reading. Developmental Psychology, 30, 949–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kail, R., Hall, L. K., & Caskey, B. J. (1999). Processing speed, exposure to print, and naming speed. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kibby, M. Y., Lee, S. E., & Dyer, S. M. (2014). Reading performance is predicted by more than phonological processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 960. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirby, R., Georgiou, G., Martinussen, R., & Parrila, R. (2010). Naming speed and reading: A review of the empirical and theoretical literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirby, J., Parrila, R., & Pfeiffer, S. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lervåg, A., Bråten, I., & Hulme, C. (2009). The cognitive and linguistic foundations of early reading development: A Norwegian latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 45, 764–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lervåg, A., & Hulme, C. (2009). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) taps a mechanism that places constraints on the development of early reading fluency. Psychological Science, 20, 1040–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Li, H., Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Liu, H., & Peng, H. (2012). Chinese children’s character recognition: Visuo-orthographic, phonological processing and morphological skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Logan, J. A. R., Schatschneider, C., & Wagner, R. (2011). Rapid serial naming and reading ability: The role of lexical access. Reading and Writing, 24, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Manis, F. R., Doi, L. M., & Bhadha, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McBride-Chang, C., & Manis, F. R. (1996). Structural invariance in the associations of naming speed, phonological awareness, and verbal reasoning in good and poor readers: A test of the double-deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing, 8, 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., Zhou, A., Wat, C. P., & Wagner, R. K. (2003). Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children’s Chinese character recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 743–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McQuarrie, L., & Parrila, R. (2009). Phonological representations in deaf children: Rethinking the “functional equivalence” hypothesis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14, 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moll, K., Fussenegger, B., Willburger, E., & Landerl, K. (2009). RAN is not a measure of orthographic processing: Evidence from the asymmetric German orthography. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nunes, T., Aidinis, A., & Bryant, P. (2006). The acquisition of written morphology in Greek. In M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 201–218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. Olson, R. K., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities (pp. 243–277). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
  47. Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J., & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pan, J., McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2011). What is in the naming? A 5-year longitudinal study of early rapid naming and phonological sensitivity in relation to subsequent reading skills in both native Chinese and English as a second language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 897–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pan, J., Yan, M., Laubrock, J., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2013). Eye–voice span during rapid automatized naming of digits and dice in Chinese normal and dyslexic children. Developmental Science, 16, 967–979.Google Scholar
  50. Papadopoulos, T. C., Georgiou, G., & Kendeou, P. (2009). Investigating the double-deficit hypothesis in Greek: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 528–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Papadopoulos, T. C., Georgiou, G., & Spanoudis, G. (2015, September). Demystifying the RAN-reading relationship: Beyond unitary explanations. Paper presented at the 17th European Conference on Developmental Psychology in Braga, Portugal.Google Scholar
  52. Parrila, R., Kirby, J. R., & McQuarrie, L. (2004). Articulation rate, naming speed, verbal short-term memory, and phonological awareness: Longitudinal predictors of early reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Poulsen, M., Juul, H., & Elbro, C. (2015). Multiple mediation analysis of the relationship between rapid naming and reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 38, 124–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Powell, D., Stainthorp, R., Stuart, M., Garwood, H., & Quinlan, P. (2007). An experimental comparison between rival theories of rapid automatized naming performance and its relationship to reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98, 46–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. In A. F. Hayes, M. D. Slater, & L. B. Snyder (Eds.), Advanced data analysis methods for communication research (pp. 13–54). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Protopapas, A., Altani, A., & Georgiou, G. (2013). Development of serial processing in reading and rapid naming. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 914–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Protopapas, A., Tzakosta, M., Chalamandaris, A., & Tsiakoulis, P. (2012). IPLR: An online resource for Greek word-level and sub-lexical information. Language Resources and Evaluation, 46, 449–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rothe, S., Schulte-Körne, G., & Ise, E. (2014). Does sensitivity to orthographic regularities influence reading and spelling acquisition? A 1-year prospective study. Reading and Writing, 27, 1141–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rueffer, A. (2000). An examination of the factors underlying the development of skilled reading. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  60. Savage, R., Pillay, V., & Melidona, S. (2007). Deconstructing rapid automatized naming: Component processes and the prediction of reading difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Silva, S., Faísca, L., Araújo, S., Casaca, L., Carvalho, L., Petersson, K. M., et al. (2015). Too little or too much? Parafoveal preview benefits and parafoveal load costs in dyslexic adults. Annals of Dyslexia,. doi: 10.1007/s11881-015-0113-z.Google Scholar
  62. Song, S., Georgiou, G., Su, M.-M., & Shu, H. (2016). How well do phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming correlate with reading accuracy and fluency in Chinese? A meta-analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 99–123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Speece, D. L., Ritchey, K. D., Silverman, R., Schatschneider, C., Walker, C. Y., & Andrusik, K. N. (2010). Identifying children in middle childhood who are at risk for reading problems. School Psychology Review, 39, 258–276.Google Scholar
  64. Stainthorp, R., Powell, D., & Stuart, M. (2013). The relationship between rapid naming and word spelling in English. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, 371–388.Google Scholar
  65. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Steacy, L. M., Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R., & Compton, D. (2014). Classification of double deficit groups across time: An analysis of group stability from kindergarten to second grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sunseth, K., & Bowers, P. G. (2002). Rapid naming and phonemic awareness: Contributions to reading, spelling, and orthographic knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 401–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  69. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  71. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming ability to growth of word-reading skills in second- to fifth- grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Torppa, M., Georgiou, G., Salmi, P., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2012). Examining the double-deficit hypothesis in an orthographically consistent language: The effect of familial risk for dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. van den Boer, M., & de Jong, P. F. (2015). Parallel and serial reading processes in children’s word and nonword reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. van den Boer, M., Georgiou, G., & de Jong, P. F. (2016). The naming of short words is (almost) the same as the naming of alphanumeric symbols. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 144, 152–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. van den Boer, M., van Bergen, E., & de Jong, P. F. (2014). Underlying skills of oral and silent reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 128, 138–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. van den Bos, K. P., Zijlstra, B. J. H., & Spelberg, B. J. H. (2002). Life-span data on continuous-naming speeds of numbers, letters, colors, and pictured objects, and word-reading speed. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wagner, R., Torgesen, J., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). CTOPP: Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  79. Wechsler, D. (1992). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (3rd ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  80. Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th ed.). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  81. Wijayathilake, M. A. D. K., & Parrila, R. (2014). Predictors of word reading skills in good and struggling readers in Sinhala. Writing Systems Research, 6, 120–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock–Johnson tests of cognitive ability—Revised. Chicago: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
  84. Yan, M., Pan, J., Laubrock, L., Kliegl, R., & Shu, H. (2013). Parafoveal processing efficiency in rapid automatized naming: A comparison between Chinese normal and dyslexic children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 579–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., & Blomert, L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21, 551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • George K. Georgiou
    • 1
  • Rauno Parrila
    • 1
  • Timothy C. Papadopoulos
    • 2
  1. 1.Department Educational Psychology, 5-143 Education NorthUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.University of CyprusNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations