Reading and Writing

, Volume 17, Issue 7–8, pp 769–800 | Cite as

Self-teaching in normal and disabled readers

  • David L Share
  • Carmit Shalev


This study set out to investigate the self-teaching of good and poor readers in pointed Hebrew – a highly regular orthography. Four groups of children (three groups in Grades 4 to 6, and one group in Grade 2) were included in this study; poor readers with large discrepancies between IQ and reading (‘dyslexics’), IQ-nondiscrepant poor readers (non-dyslexic or ‘garden-variety’ poor readers), chronological-age matched normal readers, and a group of younger normal readers matched to the older garden-variety group on both reading and mental age. It was hypothesized that primary deficits in phonological recoding (decoding) would impair the identification of novel target words (fictitious names of fruits/towns/stars/coins, etc.) appearing in text, which, in turn, would lead to deficient orthographic memory for target spellings. Alternative predictions were derived with regard to the degree of orthographic deficiency. According to the ‘compensatory processing’ hypothesis, orthographic learning was expected to be relatively less impaired among disabled readers compared to normal readers. The alternative ‘dissociation’ hypothesis, on the other hand, predicts that disabled readers’ orthographic learning would be significantly more impaired than that of normal readers. Neither hypothesis was supported. Impaired orthographic learning, commensurate with levels of target decoding success, was evident in the post-test spelling and orthographic choices of both groups of poor readers. Indeed, a close link was observed between levels of target word decoding and the acquisition of orthographic information among all three older groups of children. No qualitative differences between dyslexics and garden-variety poor readers emerged in patterns of self-teaching. While the data from the three older groups supported a model of developmental delay rather than deviance, findings from the younger reading-age/mental-age controls revealed startling qualitative divergence in orthographic learning. No statistically reliable evidence was obtained for orthographic learning in these younger beginning readers who displayed an essentially ‘surface’ pattern of non-lexical reading. A hybrid ‘orthographic sensitivity’ hypothesis was proposed to account for these data, according to which an initially surface-style of word reading engendered by a highly regular orthography gives way to a highly specialized print-specific (orthographic) processing advantage that develops in the course of the second school year as an outgrowth of a critical volume of print experience.


IQ-discrepancy Orthographic learning Phonological recoding Reading development Reading disabilities Self-teaching 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aaron, P. G. 1997The impending demise of the discrepancy formulaReview of Educational Research67461502Google Scholar
  2. Adams, M. J., Bruck, M. 1993Word recognition: The interface of educational policies and scientific researchReading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal5113139Google Scholar
  3. Bentin, S., Deutsch, A., Liberman, I. Y. 1990Syntactic competence and reading ability in childrenJournal of Experimental Child Psychology48147172Google Scholar
  4. Bentin, S., Frost, R. 1995Morphological factors in visual word identification in HebrewFeldman, L. B. eds. Morphological aspects of language processingLawrence ErlbaumHillsdale, NJ271292Google Scholar
  5. Brooks, L. 1977Visual pattern in fluent word identificationReber, A. S.Scarborough, D. L. eds. Toward a psychology of readingErlbaum AssociatesHillsdale, NJ143181Google Scholar
  6. Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K. E., Share, D. L. 2002Orthographic learning during reading: Examining the role of self-teachingJournal of Experimental Child Psychology82185199Google Scholar
  7. Castles, A., Datta, H., Gayan, J., Olson, R. K. 1999Varieties of developmental reading disorder: Genetic and environmental influencesJournal of Experimental Child Psychology727394Google Scholar
  8. Cossu, G. 1999The acquisition of Italian orthographyHarris, M.Hatano, G. eds. Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspectiveCambridge University PressCambridge1033Google Scholar
  9. Ehri, L. C., Saltmarsh, J. 1995Beginning readers outperform older disabled readers in learning to read words by sightReading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal7295326Google Scholar
  10. Felton, R. H., Wood, F. B. 1992A reading level match study of nonword reading skills in poor readers with varying IQJournal of Learning Disabilities25318326Google Scholar
  11. Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Liberman, I. Y., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D. J., Fowler, A. E., Shaywitz, B.A. 1994Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitionsJournal of Educational Psychology86623Google Scholar
  12. Fredman, G., Stevenson, J. 1988Reading processes in specific reading retarded and reading backward 13 year-oldsBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology697108Google Scholar
  13. Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Winikates, D. , Mehta, P., Schatschneider, C., Fletcher,  J. M. 1997Early interventions for children with reading disabilitiesScientific Studies of Reading1255276Google Scholar
  14. Foorman, B. R., Torgesen, J. 2001Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction promote reading success in all childrenLearning Disabilities Research & Practice16203212Google Scholar
  15. Frost , R., Bentin, S. 1992Reading consonants and guessing vowels: Visual word recognition in HebrewFrost, R.Katz, L. eds. Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaningNorth-HollandAmsterdam2744Google Scholar
  16. Hogaboam, T. W., Perfetti, C. A. 1978Reading skill and the role of verbal experience in decodingJournal of Educational Psychology70717729Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, N. E., Coltheart, M. 2001Routes to reading success and failure: Toward an integrated cognitive psychology of atypical reading.Psychology PressPhiladelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  18. Jorm, A. F., Share, D. L. 1983Phonological recoding and reading acquisitionApplied Psycholinguistics4103147Google Scholar
  19. Lovett, M.W., Lacerenza, L., Borden, S.L., Frijters, J. C., Steinbach, K. A., Palma, M. 2000Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomesJournal of Educational Psychology92263283Google Scholar
  20. Manis, F. R. 1985Acquisition of word identification skills in normal and disabled readersJournal of Educational Psychology777890Google Scholar
  21. Olson, R. K., Kliegl, R., Davidson, B. J., Foltz, G. 1985Individual and developmental differences in reading disabilityBesner, D.Waller, T. G.E., G. eds. Reading research: Advances in theory and practiceAcademic PressNew York164Google Scholar
  22. Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Ring, J., Johnson, M. 1997Computer-based remedial training in phoneme awareness and phonological decoding: Effects on the posttraining development of word recognitionScientific Studies of Reading1235253Google Scholar
  23. Ortar, G. (1987). Hava Nikra: Mivchan lehavanat hanikra leveit-hasefer Nosach Yod [Let’s read: Test of reading comprehension for school, Version 10]. Achi’ever Press.Google Scholar
  24. Perfetti, C. A. 1985Reading abilityOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., Olson, R. K. 1992The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A reviewReading Research Quarterly272953Google Scholar
  26. Raven, J., Raven, J.C., Court, J. H. 1976Raven’s progressive matricesJ. C. Raven Ltd., Oxford Psychologists PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Ravid, D. 1995Language change in child and adult Hebrew: A psycholinguistic perspectiveOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Reitsma, P. 1983aPrinted word learning in beginning readersJournal of Experimental Child Psychology,36321339Google Scholar
  29. Reitsma, P. 1983bWord-specific knowledge in beginning readingJournal of Research in Reading,64156Google Scholar
  30. Share, D. L. 1995Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisitionCognition55151218Google Scholar
  31. Share, D. L. 1996Word recognition and spelling processes in specific reading disabled and garden-variety poor readersDyslexia2167174Google Scholar
  32. Share, D. L. 1999Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesisJournal of Experimental Child Psychology7295129Google Scholar
  33. Share, D. L. (2002). Lexical and contextual factors in printed word learning. Research report submitted to the Ministry of Education, Office of the Chief Scientist. April, 2002.Google Scholar
  34. Share, D. L. 2004Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teachingJournal of Experimental Child Psychology87267298Google Scholar
  35. Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F. 1987Segmental analysis: Co-requisite to reading, vital for self-teaching, requiring phonological memoryEuropean Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology7509513Google Scholar
  36. Share, D. L., Levin, I. 1999Learning to read and write in HebrewHarris, M.Hatano, G. eds. Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspectiveCambridge University PressCambridge89111Google Scholar
  37. Share,  D. L., McGee, R., McKenzie, D., Williams, S. M., Silva , P. A. 1987Further evidence relating to the distinction between specific reading retardation and general reading backwardnessBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology53544Google Scholar
  38. Shatil, E. (1997). Predicting reading ability: Evidence for cognitive modularity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Haifa.Google Scholar
  39. Shaywitz, S. E., Escobar, M. D., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., Makuch, R. 1992Distribution and temporal stability of dyslexia in an epidemiological sample of 414 children followed longitudinallyNew England Journal of Medicine326145150Google Scholar
  40. Shimron,  J., Navon,  D. (1981–1982)The dependence on graphemes and on their translation to phonemes in reading: A developmental perspectiveReading Research Quarterly17210228Google Scholar
  41. Siegel, L. S. 1989IQ is irrelevant to the definition of reading disabilityJournal of Learning Disability22469479Google Scholar
  42. Siegel, L. S., Share, D. L., Geva, E. 1995Dyslexics have orthographic skills that are superior to normal readersPsychological Science6250254Google Scholar
  43. Solberg, S., Nevo, B. 1979Preliminary steps towards an Israeli standardization of the Peabody Test (in Hebrew)Megamot3407413Google Scholar
  44. Stanovich, K. E. 1988Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference modelJournal of Learning Disabilities21590604Google Scholar
  45. Stanovich, K. E. 1991Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astrayReading Research Quarterly26729Google Scholar
  46. Stanovich, K. E. 1994Does dyslexia existJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry35579595Google Scholar
  47. Stanovich, K. E. 1998Refining the phonological core deficit modelChild Psychology and Psychiatry Review31721Google Scholar
  48. Stanovich, K. E., Siegel, L. S. 1994Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference modelJournal of Educational Psychology862453Google Scholar
  49. Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., LeDoux, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A. 2002Validity of IQ-discrepancy classifications of reading disabilities: A meta-analysisAmerican Educational Research Journal39469518Google Scholar
  50. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–58, 78.Google Scholar
  51. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A. 1997Prevention and remediation of severe reading disability: Keeping the end in mindScientific Studies in Reading1217234Google Scholar
  52. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M. 1987Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental studyMerrill-Palmer Quarterly33321363Google Scholar
  53. Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., Scanlon, D. M. 2004Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decadesJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry45240Google Scholar
  54. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Lyon, G. R. 2000Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-discrepancy definition of reading disabilityJournal of Learning Disabilities33223238Google Scholar
  55. Wimmer, H., Landerl, K., Frith, U. 1999Learning to read German: Normal and impaired acquisitionHarris, M.Hatano, G. eds. Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspectiveCambridge University PressCambridge3450Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Learning Disabilities Faculty of EducationUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations