Review of Accounting Studies

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 361–391 | Cite as

The effects of audit partner pre-client and client-specific experience on audit quality and on perceptions of audit quality

  • Wuchun Chi
  • Linda A. Myers
  • Thomas C. Omer
  • Hong Xie


We examine the associations between audit partner pre-client and client-specific experience and audit quality using data from Taiwan, where signing audit partner names are disclosed. Using discretionary accruals and interest rate spreads to proxy for audit quality and perceptions of audit quality, respectively, we find that both pre-client and client-specific experience improve audit quality and creditor perceptions of audit quality. We also find that audit partner pre-client experience is positively associated with audit quality early in the engagement, but not when the partner has been with the client for at least five years. Our findings provide evidence consistent with the assumption underlying the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s decision to require the disclosure of engagement partner names. They also suggest that pre-client experience cannot completely mitigate the loss of client-specific knowledge when partner or audit firm turnover occurs.


Audit partner experience Audit quality Discretionary accruals Interest rate spreads Auditor tenure 


M4 M41 M42 



We thank Paul Fischer (the Editor), two anonymous reviewers, Brian Bratten, Monika Causholli, Andrew Doucet, Guojin Gong, Ole-Kristian Hope, Yue Li, Linda McDaniel, James Myers, Robert Ramsay, Steven Salterio, Marjorie Shelley, Shui-Liang Tung, Chung-Fern Wu, Minlei Ye, and David Ziebart; participants at the 2nd Symposium of China Journal of Accounting Research, the 2010 CAPANA Conference, and the 2011 European Accounting Association conference; as well as workshop participants at National Taiwan University and at the University of Kentucky for helpful comments and suggestions. Wuchun Chi gratefully acknowledges financial support from National Science Council (Project No. NSC 94-2416-H-004-036). Linda Myers gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Haslam Chair of Business at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and from the Garrison/Wilson Chair while at the University of Arkansas. Thomas Omer gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Delmar Lienemann Sr. Chair of Accounting at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and from Ernst & Young while at Texas A&M University. Hong Xie gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Von Allmen Research Support endowment and the PwC fellowship endowment at the University of Kentucky.


  1. Anthony, J., & Ramesh, K. (1992). Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices: A test of the life cycle hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(2–3), 203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anzai, Y., & Simon, H. A. (1979). The theory of learning by doing. Psychological Review, 86(2), 124–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aobdia, D., Lin, C.-J., & Petacchi, R. (2015). Capital market consequences of audit partner quality. The Accounting Review, 90(6), 2143–2176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D., & LaFond, R. (2006). The effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1–2), 203–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, C., DeFond, M., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: the effect of managers on firm policies. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1169–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bharath, S. T., Sunder, J., & Sunder, S. V. (2008). Accounting quality and debt contracting. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonner, S. E., & Walker, P. L. (1994). The effects of instruction and experience on the acquisition of audit knowledge. The Accounting Review, 69(1), 157–178.Google Scholar
  10. Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carcello, J. V., & Li, C. (2013). Costs and benefits of requiring an engagement partner signature: Recent experience in the United Kingdom. The Accounting Review, 88(5), 1511–1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carcello, J. V., & Nagy, A. L. (2004). Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carey, P., & Simnett, R. (2006). Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 81(3), 653–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, C., Lin, C., & Lin, Y. (2008). Audit partner tenure, audit firm tenure, and discretionary accruals: Does long auditor tenure impair earnings quality? Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(2), 415–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen, S., Sun, S., & Wu, D. (2010). Client importance, institutional improvements, and audit quality in China: An office and individual auditor level analysis. The Accounting Review, 85(1), 127–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chi, W., & Huang, H. (2005). Discretionary accruals, audit-firm tenure and audit-partner tenure: Empirical evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 1(1), 65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chi, W., Huang, H., Liao, Y., & Xie, H. (2009). Mandatory audit-partner rotation, audit quality and market perception: Evidence from Taiwan. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(2), 359–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chi, W., Douthett, E., & Lisic, L. (2012). Client importance and auditor independence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(3), 320–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chiesi, H. L., Spillich, G. J., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(3), 257–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chin, C., & Chi, H. (2009). Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), 729–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clement, M. (1999). Analyst forecast accuracy: Do ability, resources, and portfolio complexity matter? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 27(3), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dechow, P. (1994). Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18(1), 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dechow, P., & Dichev, I. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(Supplement), 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics., 56(2–3), 275–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Drake, M., & Myers, L. A. (2011). Analysts’ accrual-related over-optimism: Do analyst characteristics play a role? Review of Accounting Studies, 16(1), 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dunn, K., & Mayhew, B. (2004). Audit firm industry specialization and client disclosure quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 9(1), 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Easley, D., & O’Hara, M. (2004). Information and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1553–1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. M., & Schipper, K. (2004). Costs of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 967–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. M., & Schipper, K. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 295–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goodwin, J., & Wu, D. (2014). Is the effect of industry expertise on audit pricing an office-level or a partner-level phenomenon? Review of Accounting Studies, 19(4), 1532–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hammersley, J. S. (2006). Pattern identification and industry-specialist auditors. The Accounting Review, 81(2), 309–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hribar, P., & Collins, D. (2002). Errors and estimating accruals: implications for empirical research. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(1), 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson, V., Khurana, I., & Reynolds, J. (2002). Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4), 637–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnstone, K. M., & Bedard, J. C. (2003). Risk management in client acceptance decisions. The Accounting Review, 78(4), 1003–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnstone, K. M., & Bedard, J. C. (2004). Audit firm portfolio management decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(4), 659–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones, J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaplan, S. E., O’Donnell, E. F., & Arel, B. M. (2008). The influence of auditor experience on the persuasiveness of information provided by management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(1), 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kim, J., Simunic, D., Stein, M., & Yi, C. (2011). Voluntary audits and the cost of debt capital for privately held firms: Korean evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(2), 585–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Larcker, D. F., & Rusticus, T. O. (2010). On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(3), 186–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mansi, S., Maxwell, W., & Miller, D. (2004). Does auditor quality and tenure matter to investors? Evidence from the bond market. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(Supplement), 755–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Myers, J. N., Myers, L. A., & Omer, T. C. (2003). Exploring the term of auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Review, 78(3), 779–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Keefe, T. B., King, R. D., & Gaver, K. M. (1994). Audit fees, industry specialization, and compliance with GAAS reporting standards. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 13(2), 41–55.Google Scholar
  44. Pittman, J. A., & Fortin, S. (2004). Auditor choice and the cost of debt capital in newly public firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(1), 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2011). Improving the transparency of audits: Proposed amendments to PCAOB auditing standards and Form 2. PCAOB Release No. 2011–007.Google Scholar
  46. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2015). Improving the transparency of audits: Rules to require disclosure of certain audit participants on a new PCAOB form and related amendments to auditing standards. PCAOB Release No. 2015–008.Google Scholar
  47. Sengupta, P. (1998). Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review, 73(4), 459–474.Google Scholar
  48. Shelton, S. W. (1999). The effect of experience on the use of irrelevant evidence in auditor judgment. The Accounting Review, 74(2), 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stanley, J. D., & DeZoort, F. T. (2007). Audit firm tenure and financial restatements: An analysis of industry specialization and fee effects. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(2), 131–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stock, J. H., & Yogo, M. (2005). Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In D. W. K. Andrews & J. H. Stock (Eds.), Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas J. Rothenberg (ch. 5). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Tubbs, R. M. (1992). The effect of experience on the auditor’s organization and amount of knowledge. The Accounting Review, 67(4), 783–801.Google Scholar
  52. Zmijewski, M. E. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(Supplement), 50–82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wuchun Chi
    • 1
  • Linda A. Myers
    • 2
  • Thomas C. Omer
    • 3
  • Hong Xie
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of AccountingNational Chengchi UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Haslam College of BusinessThe University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleKnoxvilleUSA
  3. 3.School of AccountancyUniversity of Nebraska– LincolnLincolnUSA
  4. 4.Von Allmen School of AccountancyUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations