Advertisement

Review of Accounting Studies

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 559–595 | Cite as

Analysts’ pre-tax income forecasts and the tax expense anomaly

  • Bok Baik
  • Kyonghee Kim
  • Richard Morton
  • Yongoh Roh
Article
  • 953 Downloads

Abstract

This paper examines whether analysts’ pre-tax income forecasts mitigate the tax expense anomaly documented by Thomas and Zhang (J Account Res 49:791–821, 2011). They find that seasonal changes in quarterly income tax expense are positively related to future returns after controlling for the earnings surprise and conclude that investors underreact to value-relevant information in tax expense. When analysts issue both earnings and pre-tax income forecasts, they implicitly provide a forecast of income tax expense. We posit that this implicit forecast helps investors recognize the persistence of current tax expense surprise for future earnings. Accordingly, we expect that mispricing of tax expense will be less severe for firms with earnings and pre-tax income forecasts. As expected, we find that the presence of pre-tax income forecasts significantly weakens the positive relation between tax expense surprise and future returns, consistent with analysts’ implicit forecasts of tax expense mitigating the tax expense anomaly.

Keywords

Pre-tax income forecasts Disaggregated forecasts Tax expense anomaly Analysts’ forecasts 

JEL Classification

G14 M41 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Katherine Sonu, Frank Zhang (discussant), and participants at the 2014 Korean Accounting Association annual meeting and the 2015 American Accounting Association annual meeting for their helpful comments and suggestions. Bok Baik acknowledges financial support from the Institute of Management Research, Seoul National University.

References

  1. Abarbanell, J., & Bushee, B. (1997). Fundamental analysis, future earnings, and stock prices. Journal of Accounting Research, 35, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayers, B. C. (1998). Deferred tax accounting under SFAS No. 109: An empirical investigation of its incremental value-relevance relative to APB No. 11. The Accounting Review, 73, 195–212.Google Scholar
  4. Bernard, V. L., & Thomas, J. K. (1989). Post-earnings-announcement drift: Delayed price response or risk premium? Journal of Accounting Research, 27, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhojraj, S., Sengupta, P., & Zhang, S. (2009). Restructuring charges, regulatory changes and the accruals anomaly. Working paper, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  6. Bradshaw, M. T., Richardson, S. A., & Sloan, R. G. (2001). Do analysts and auditors use information in accruals? Journal of Accounting Research, 39, 45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Call, A. C., Chen, S., & Tong, Y. H. (2009). Are analysts’ earnings forecasts more accurate when accompanied by cash flow forecasts? Review of Accounting Studies, 14, 358–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, S., & Matsumoto, D. A. (2006). Favorable versus unfavorable recommendations: The impact on analyst access to management-provided information. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(4), 657–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clement, M. B. (1999). Analyst forecast accuracy: Do ability, resources, and portfolio complexity matter? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 27(3), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clement, M. B., & Tse, S. Y. (2003). Do investors respond to analysts’ forecast revisions as if forecast accuracy is all that matters? The Accounting Review, 78(1), 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeFond, M. L., & Hung, M. (2003). An empirical analysis of analysts’ cash flow forecasts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35, 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Desai, H., Rajgopal, S., & Venkatachalam, M. (2004). Value-glamour and accruals mispricing: One anomaly or two? The Accounting Review, 79, 355–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dhaliwal, D. S., Gleason, C. A., & Mills, L. F. (2004). Last-chance earnings management: Using the tax expense to meet analysts’ forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21, 431–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dhaliwal, D. S., Kaplan, S., Laux, R., & Weisbrod, E. (2012). The information content of tax expense for firms reporting losses. Working paper, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  15. Dhaliwal, D. S., Trezevant, R., & Wilkins, M. (2000). Test of deferred tax explanation of the negative association between the LIFO reserve and firm value. Contemporary Accounting Research, 17, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diether, K. B., Malloy, C. J., & Scherbina, A. (2002). Differences of opinion and the cross section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 57, 2113–2141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ertimur, Y., Mayew, W. J., & Stubben, S. R. (2011). Analyst reputation and the issuance of disaggregated earnings forecasts to I/B/E/S. Review of Accounting Studies, 16, 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1996). Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. The Journal of Finance, 51, 55–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 607–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Green, J., Hand, J. R. M., & Soliman, M. T. (2011). Going, going, gone? The apparent demise of the accruals anomaly. Management Science, 57, 797–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanlon, M., Laplante, S. K., & Shevlin, T. (2005). Evidence for the possible information loss of conforming book income and taxable income. Journal of Law and Economics, 48, 407–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hirshleifer, D., Lim, S., & Teoh, S. (2011). Limited investor attention and stock market misreactions to accounting information. Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 1, 35–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hirshleifer, D., & Teoh, S. (2003). Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 38, 337–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hong, H., & Kubik, J. (2003). Analyzing the analysts: Career concerns and biased earnings forecasts. The Journal of Finance, 58, 313–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacob, J., Lys, T. Z., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Expertise in forecasting performance of security analysts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(1), 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jegadeesh, N., & Livnat, J. (2006). Revenue surprises and stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41, 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Keung, E. C. (2010). Do supplementary sales forecasts increase the credibility of financial analysts’ earnings forecasts? The Accounting Review, 85, 2047–2074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lev, B., & Nissim, D. (2004). Taxable income, future earnings, and equity values. The Accounting Review, 79, 1039–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lev, B., & Thiagarajan, S. R. (1993). Fundamental information analysis. Journal of Accounting Research, 31, 190–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Louis, H., Robinson, D., & Sbaraglia, A. (2008). An integrated analysis of the association between accrual disclosure and the abnormal accrual anomaly. Review of Accounting Studies, 13, 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McInnis, J., & Collins, D. W. (2011). The effect of cash flow forecasts on accrual quality and benchmark beating. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51, 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mikhail, M. B., Walther, B. R., & Willis, R. H. (1997). Do security analysts improve their performance with experience? Journal of Accounting Research, 35, 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mohanram, P. S. (2014). Analysts’ cash flow forecasts and the decline of the accruals anomaly. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(4), 1143–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Brien, P. C. (1988). Analysts’ forecasts as earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 10(1), 53–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Brien, P. C., & Bhushan, R. (1990). Analyst following and institutional ownership. Journal of Accounting Research, 28, 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ohlson, J. A., & Penman, S. H. (1992). Disaggregated accounting data as explanatory variables for returns. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 7, 553–573.Google Scholar
  38. Plumlee, M. A. (2003). The effect of information complexity on analysts’ use of that information. The Accounting Review, 78(1), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Radhakrishnan, S., & Wu, S. L. (2014). Analysts’ cash flow forecasts and accrual mispricing. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(4), 1191–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramnath, S., Rock, S., & Shane, P. (2008). The financial analyst forecasting literature: A taxonomy with suggestions for further research. International Journal of Forecasting, 24(1), 34–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmidt, A. P. (2006). The persistence, forecasting, and valuation implications of the tax change component of earnings. The Accounting Review, 81, 589–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thomas, J., & Zhang, F. X. (2011). Tax expense momentum. Journal of Accounting Research, 49, 791–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weber, D. P. (2009). Do analysts and investors fully appreciate the implications of book-tax differences for future earnings? Contemporary Accounting Research, 26, 1175–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bok Baik
    • 1
  • Kyonghee Kim
    • 2
  • Richard Morton
    • 3
  • Yongoh Roh
    • 1
  1. 1.Business SchoolSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Trulaske College of BusinessUniversity of Missouri at ColumbiaColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.College of BusinessFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations