Advertisement

Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics

, Volume 54, Issue 7, pp 452–462 | Cite as

The technique of coherent echo processing in the approximation of a small number of point scatterers

  • K. V. Grkovich
  • O. I. Berngardt
Article
  • 40 Downloads

In this paper, we aim at studying the structure of individual samples of coherent echo signals and determining signal features that permit one to detect coherent backscatter and also improve the methods of signal processing. We offer a model of the received signal in the form of a square pulse with duration of the order of the sounding pulse length and filled with a sinusoidal signal of arbitrary frequency. It is shown that this model is quite effective to interpret coherent echo signals in some cases. There are two ways of practical use of the model. One is a technique which singles out the sounding sessions in which strong coherent echo signals are distinguished against the background of other signals received by the Irkutsk incoherent scatter radar. Another is a technique of the spatial resolution improvement.

Keywords

Radar Ionospheric Plasma Scattered Signal Doppler Frequency Shift Antenna Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. Haldoupis, Ann. Geophys., 7, No. 3, 239 (1989).ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Chisham, M. Lester, S. E. Milan, et al., Surveys Geophys., 28, 33 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. Buneman, Phys. Rev. Lett ., 10, 285 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. T. Farley, J. Geophys. Res., 68, 6083 (1963).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. C. Foster and D. Tetenbaum, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 1251 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. P. Potekhin, O. I. Berngardt, V. I. Kurkin, et al., Proc. SPIE., 3983, 328 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    É. L. Afraimovich, O. I. Berngardt, N. A. Zolotukhina, et al., Geomagn. Aeron., 41, No. 5, 569 (2001).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. A. Zolotukhina, O. I. Berngardt, and B. G. Shpynev, Geomagn. Aeron., 47, No. 3, 343 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O. I. Berngardt, N. A. Zolotukhina, and B. G. Shpynev, Geomagn. Aeron., 44, No. 6, 726 (2004).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. I. Berngardt, Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 49, No 6, 415 (2006).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. A. Zherebtsov, A. V. Zavorin, A. V. Medvedev, et al., Radiotekh. Élektron., 47, No. 7, 1 (2002).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. V. Grkovich and O. I. Berngardt, Geomagn. Aeron., 49, No. 8 (Spec. Issue), 1231 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. W. Helstrom, Statistical Theory of Signal Detection, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1960).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. N. Tikhonov and V. Ya. Arsenin, Methods of Solving Ill-Posed Problems [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1979).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. L. Voronov and B. G. Shpynev, Proc. SPIE., 3583, 414 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. C. Foster and H. B. Vo, J. Geophys. Res. A, 107, No. 12, SIA16-1 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesIrkutskRussia

Personalised recommendations