Abstract
Innovation requires cooperation among multiple actors spread across different organizations in order to fund, research, develop, scale-up and bring new products and services to the marketplace. Proximity is often corelated with cooperation, leading to policies adopted around the world to build science and technology parks as a way of stimulating economic development. However, cooperation can falter in the presence of extant collective action problems. The transformation of collocated facilities and expertise into dynamic innovation clusters requires that multiple individual actors recognize the opportunities and synergies that can arise from cooperation, diagnose prevailing collective action problems, and craft the rules needed to solve the myriad challenges to working together. Elaborating the institutional contexts within which linkages across innovation ecosystems can grow and thrive can also broaden the opportunity for economic growth to areas beyond dense technology clusters.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aghion, P., & Jaravel, X. (2015). Knowledge spillovers, innovation and growth. The Economic Journal, 125(583), 533–573.
Audretsch, D. B. (2015). Everything in its place: Entrepreneurship and the strategic Management of Cities, regions, and states. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (2004). Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation- Handbook of regional and urban economics, 4, 2713–2739.
Braunerhjelm, P., & Feldman, P. (2006). Cluster genesis: Technology based industrial development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32(125), 1–14.
U. Cantner & A. Meder (2008). Innovators and the diversity of innovation systems. Applied Economics Quarterly. 59(supplement), 9-26.
Coase, R. H. (1937). Nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
Czarnitzki, D., Hussinger, K., & Schneider, C. (2015). R&D collaboration with uncertain intellectual property rights. Review of Industrial Organization, 46, 183–204.
Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2014). Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Research Policy, 10, 1785–1799.
Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2016). Defining clusters of related industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(1), 1–38.
Desrochers, P., & Sautet, F. (2004). Cluster-based economic strategy, facilitation policy and the market process. The Review of Austrian Economics, 17, 233–245.
Dorfman, N. S. (1983). Route 128: The development of a regional high technology economy. Research Policy, 12(6), 299–316.
The Economist. (2015). Business high school: Companies struggling to find talent are looking to teenagers, July 18.
Economic Development Administration. (2020) “U.S. Cluster Mapping Project.” Accessed at eda.gov on February 7, 2020.
Estrin, James (August 12, 2015). "Kodak's first digital moment". The New York Times.
Feldman, M.F. &. Francis, J.L. (2004). Homegrown Solutions: Fostering Cluster Formation. Economic Development Quarterly, 18(2).
Flamm, K. (2003). SEMATECH revisited: Assessing consortium impacts on semiconductor industry R&D. In In National Research Council, Securing the Future: Regional and National Programs to Support the Semiconductor Industry. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
Hayek, F. A. (2014) “Degrees of explanation” (1955). In B. Caldwell (Ed.), The market and other orders. London: Routledge.
Irwin, D. A., & Klenow, P. J. (1996). Sematech: Purpose and performance. Proceedings of the National Academies of the United States, 93(23).
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 63, 577–598.
Janssen, M. A., Holahan, R., Lee, A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Lab experiments for the study of social-ecological systems. Science, 328(5978), 613–617.
Klimenko, M. (2005). The ‘thick market’ effect and agglomeration in high-growth industries. Pacific Economic Review, 10(2), 167–187.
Lachmann, L. M. (1978). Capital and its structure. Kansas City: Sheed, Andrews and McMeel Inc..
Lewis, P. (2019). Technicians and innovation: A literature review. London: Gatsby Foundation.
Link, A.N. (1995). A generosity of Spirit: The early history of the research Triangle Park, Research Triangle Foundation.
A.N. Link (2009) Research, science, and technology parks. An overview of the academic literature. In National Research Council, Understanding Research, Science and Technology Parks: Global Best Practices: Report of a Symposium. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics; an introductory volume. London: Macmillan.
McFadden, C. (2012). Praise for Sematech. Issues in Science and Technology, 28(4).
Mills, K. G., Reynolds, E. B., & Reamer, A. (2008). Clusters and competitiveness: A new Federal Role for stimulating regional economies. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Building America's skilled technical workforce. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2008). An assessment of the SBIR program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2011). Growing innovation clusters for American prosperity: Summary of a symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2012). Clustering for 21st century prosperity: Summary of a symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2013). 21st century manufacturing: The role of the manufacturing extension partnership program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, V. (1971). The political theory of a compound republic: Designing the American experiment. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
Polyani, M. (1951). The logic of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73–93.
Potter, A., & Watts, H. D. (2014). Revisiting Marshall's agglomeration economies: Technological relatedness and the evolution of the Sheffield metals cluster. Regional Studies, 48(4), 603–623.
Robey, J., Eberts, R. W., Pittelko, B., & Robey, C. (2018). The National-Level Economic Impact of the manufacturing extension partnership (MEP): Estimates for fiscal year 2017. Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge MA: Harvard University press.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1983) [1934]. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books.
Shivakumar, S. (2017). Innovation as a collective action challenge. In P. D. Aligica, P. Lewis & V. H. Stor (Eds.), The Austrian and Bloomington School of Political Economy, Advances in Austrian Economics (Vol. 22). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Technology News. (January 3, 2018). Beijing to build $2 billion AI research park: Xinhua
Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219.
United States Census Bureau. (2019). Delineating metropolitan and Micropolitan statistical areas.
Wessner, C. W., & Howell, T. (2019). Regional Renaissance. How New York’s Capital Region became a Nanotechnology Powerhouse: Springer.
Wessner, C. W., & Shivakumar, S. (2013). Driving regional growth, the growing role of policies to promote clusters. In D. Audretsch & M. Walshok (Eds.), Creating competitiveness, entrepreneurship and innovation policies for growth. Edward Elgar.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Submitted to RAE Special Issue on Innovation and Austrian Economics
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shivakumar, S. Beyond clusters: Crafting contexts for innovation. Rev Austrian Econ 34, 115–127 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-020-00509-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-020-00509-6