The Austrian school of economics has played a key contribution toward an improved understanding of the characteristics of economic innovation. Over recent decades the language and concepts of innovation theory has broadened to non-market settings, among other things giving rise to a voluminous literature on “social innovation.” During the same period of time, scholars have increasingly utilised Austrian economic insights to explore the nature of social interaction and the dynamics of social change, delving into matters such as social entrepreneurship, non-price coordination, and social learning. Both social innovation and non-economic Austrian scholarship have largely been conducted independently of each other. The central claim of this paper is that scope exists for meaningful intellectual exchanges between these two sub-branches of social scientific endeavour. An Austrian perspective on social innovation centres upon entrepreneurs using their unique knowledge to create and change social norms and practices, providing micro-level foundations for broader scale social innovations of cultural and institutional character. Social innovation theory assails the limitations of market-state duality by stressing the involvement of non-market, non-state social actors in promulgating social novelties. Austrian perspectives on social theory may also gain from the social-innovation emphasis upon enhancing broad aspects of human well-being.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aligica, P. D., Boettke, P. J., & Tarko, V. (2019). Public governance and the classical-Liberal perspective: Political economy foundations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Almudi, I., Fatas-Villafranca, F., Izquierdo, L. R., & Potts, J. (2017). The economics of utopia: A co-evolutionary model of ideas, citizenship and socio-political change. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27(4), 629–662.
Anderson, A. R., & Smith, R. (2007). The moral space in entrepreneurship: An exploration of ethical imperatives and the moral legitimacy of being enterprising. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(6), 479–497.
Ayob, N., Teasdale, S., & Fagan, K. (2016). How social innovation ‘came to be’: Tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 635–653.
Bennett, E. E., & McWhorter, R. R. (2019). Social movement learning and social innovation: Empathy, agency, and the design of solutions to unmet social needs. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(2), 224–249.
Boettke, P. J. (1998). Rational choice and human agency in economics and sociology: Exploring the weber-Austrian connection. In H. Giersch (Ed.), Merits and limits of markets (pp. 54–81). Heidelberg: Springer.
Boettke, P. J., & Coyne, C. J. (2008). The political economy of the philanthropic enterprise. In G. E. Shockley, P. M. Frank, & R. R. Stough (Eds.), Non-market entrepreneurship: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 71–88). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Boettke, P. J., & Coyne, C. J. (2009). Context matters: Institutions and entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 135–209.
Boettke, P. J., & Prychitko, D. L. (2004). Is an independent nonprofit sector prone to failure? Toward an Austrian school interpretation of nonprofit and voluntary action. Conversations on Philanthropy, 1, 1–40.
Boettke, P. J., & Storr, V. H. (2002). Post-classical political economy: Polity, society and economy in Weber, Mises and Hayek. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61(1), 161–191.
Boettke, P. J., & Subrick, J. R. (2003). Rule of law, development, and human capabilities. Supreme Court Economic Review, 10, 109–126.
Buchanan, J. M. (1982). Order defined in the process of its emergence. Literature of Liberty, 5(4), 5.
Buchanan, J. M., & Congleton, R. D. ( 2003). Politics by Principle, Not Interest: Toward Nondiscriminatory Democracy. Collected works of James M. Buchanan, volume 11. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
Capriati, M. (2013). Capabilities, freedoms and innovation: Exploring connection. Innovation and Development, 3(1), 1–17.
Caulier-Grice, J., Davies, A., Patrick, R., & Norman, W. (2012). Defining social innovation. The Young Foundation. https://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/TEPSIE.D1.1.Report.DefiningSocialInnovation.Part-1-defining-social-innovation.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2018.
Chamlee-Wright, E. (1997). The cultural foundations of economic development: Urban female entrepreneurship in Ghana. New York: Routledge.
Chamlee-Wright, E., & Myers, J. (2008). Discovery and social learning in non-priced environments: An Austrian view of social network theory. Review of Austrian Economics, 21(2–3), 151–166.
Chamlee-Wright, E., & Storr, V. H. (2015). Social economy as an extension of the Austrian research program. In P. J. Boettke & C. J. Coyne (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Austrian economics (pp. 247–271). New York: Oxford University Press.
Clay, A. (2017). Utopia Inc. Aeon, February 28. https://aeon.co/essays/like-start-ups-most-intentional-communities-fail-why. Accessed 15 Aug 2019.
Coyne, C. J. (2013). Doing bad by doing good: Why humanitarian action fails. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Davis, J. B. (2008). Heterodox economics, the fragmentation of the mainstream, and embedded individual analysis. In J. T. Harvey & R. F. Garnett Jr. (Eds.), Future directions for heterodox economics (pp. 53–72). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Dekker, E., & Kuchař, P. (2017). Emergent Orders of Worth: Must we agree on more than a price? Cosmos + Taxis, 4(1), 4–17.
della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2015). The Oxford handbook of social movements. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Domanski, D., & Kaletka, C. (2018). Social innovation ecosystems. In J. Howaldt, C. Kaletka, A. Schröder, & M. Zirngiebl (Eds.), Atlas of social innovation – New practices for a better future (pp. 208–211). Dortmund: TU Dortmund University.
Dopfer, K., & Potts, J. (2008). The general theory of economic evolution. London: Routledge.
Frank, P. M., & Shockley, G. E. (2016). A critical assessment of social entrepreneurship: Ostromian Polycentricity and Hayekian knowledge. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(4), 61S–77S.
Franz, H.-W., Hochgerner, J., & Howaldt, J. (2012). Challenge social innovation: An introduction. In H.-W. Franz, J. Hochgerner, & J. Howaldt (Eds.), Challenge social innovation: Potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society (pp. 1–16). Heidelberg: Springer.
Garnett Jr., R. F. (2011). Hayek and philanthropy: A classical liberal road not taken. In A. Farrant (Ed.), Hayek, mill, and the Liberal tradition (pp. 148–162). New York: Routledge.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Goldsmith, S. (2010). The power of social innovation: How civic entrepreneurs ignite community networks for good. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Goodman, N. (2019). Don Lavoie’s dialectical liberalism. In R. E. Bissell, C. M. Sciabarra, & E. W. Younkins (Eds.), The dialectics of liberty: Exploring the context of human freedom (pp. 133–148). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
Grube, L. E., & Storr, V. H. (2015). Culture and economic action. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Grube, L. E., Haeffele-Balch, S., & Davies, E. G. (2017). The organizational evolution of the American National Red Cross: An Austrian and Bloomington approach to organizational growth and expansion. Advances in Austrian Economics, 22, 89–105.
Haeffele, S., & Storr, V. H. (2019a). Hierarchical management structures and housing the poor: An analysis of habitat for humanity in Birmingham, Alabama. The Journal of Private Enterprise, 34(1), 15–37.
Haeffele, S., & Storr, V. H. (2019b). Understanding nonprofit social enterprises: Lessons from Austrian economics. The Review of Austrian Economics, 32(3), 229–249.
Harrisson, D., Chaari, N., & Comeau-Valée, M. (2012). Intersectoral Alliance and social innovation: When corporations meet civil society. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 83(1), 1–24.
Hartley, J., & Potts, J. (2014). Cultural science: A natural history of stories, demes, knowledge and innovation. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Hayek, F. A. ( 1948). Individualism: True and false. In Individualism and economic order (pp. 1–32). London: Routledge.
Hayek, F. A. (1960). The constitution of liberty. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hayek, F. A. (1964). Kinds of order in society. New Individualist Review, 3(2), 3–12.
Hayek, F. A. ( 1997). Freedom and the economic system. In Caldwell, B. (Ed.), Socialism and war: Essays, documents, reviews (pp. 189-211). Collected works of F. A. Hayek, volume 10. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Howaldt, J., & Schwarz, M. (2010). Social innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends. In K. Henning & F. Hees (Eds.), Studies for innovation in a modern working environment – International monitoring (Vol. Volume 5). IMZ/ZLW & IfU: Aachen.
Howaldt, J., Kaletka, C., Schröder, A., & Zirngiebl, M. (2018). Atlas of social innovation – new practices for a better future. Dortmund: TU Dortmund University.
Jensen, J. (2015). Social innovation: Redesigning the welfare diamond. In A. Nicholls, J. Simon & M. Gabriel (Eds.), New frontiers in social innovation research (pp. 89–106). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Koppl, R. (2006). Entrepreneurial behavior as a human universal. In M. Minniti (Ed.), Entrepreneurship – The engine of growth (pp. 1–20). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.
Langrill, R. N., & Storr, V. H. (2015). Contemporary Austrian economics and the new economic sociology. In P. J. Boettke & C. J. Coyne (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Austrian economics (pp. 547–562). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lavoie, D. (1990). Economics and hermeneutics. New York: Routledge.
Lavoie, D. (1993). Democracy, markets, and the legal order: Notes on the nature of politics in a radically Liberal society. Social Philosophy and Policy, 10(2), 103–120.
Lemke, J. S. (2016). Interjurisdictional competition and the married women’s property acts. Public Choice, 166(3), 291–313.
Lewis, P. A. (2004). Structure and agency in economic analysis: The case of Austrian economics and the material embeddedness of socio-economic life. In J. B. Davis, A. Marciano, & J. H. Runde (Eds.), The Elgar companion to economics and philosophy (pp. 364–385). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Liljenberg, A. (2005). A socio-dynamic understanding of markets: The progressive joining forces of economic sociology and Austrian economics. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 64(4), 999–1023.
Lucas, D. S. (2017). Federal homelessness policy: A robust political economy approach. The Review of Austrian Economics, 30(3), 277–303.
Martin, A. (2010). Emergent politics and the power of ideas. Studies in Emergent Order, 3, 212–245.
Martin, A. (2018). The limits of liberalism: Good boundaries must be discovered. The Review of Austrian Economics, 31(2), 265–276.
Martin, A., & Petersen, M. (2019). Poverty alleviation as an economic problem. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(1), 205–221.
McCaffrey, M. (2018). Economic calculation and the limits of social entrepreneurship. In M. McCaffrey (Ed.), The economic theory of costs: Foundations and new directions (pp. 243–263). New York: Routledge.
Migone, A. (2011). Embedded markets: A dialogue between F.A. Hayek and Karl Polanyi. The Review of Austrian Economics, 24(4), 355–381.
Mikl-Horke, G. (2008). Austrian economics and economic sociology: Past relations and future possibilities for a socio-economic perspective. Socio-Economic Review, 6(2), 201–226.
Mises, L. v. ( 2007). Human action: A treatise on economics. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Mises, L. v. ( 2012). The general rise in prices in the light of economic theory. In R. M. Ebeling (Ed.), Selected writings of Ludwig von Mises: Monetary and economic policy problems before, during, and after the great war (pp. 131–195). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145–162.
Mulgan, G. (2012a). Social innovation theories: Can theory catch up with practice? In H.-W. Franz, J. Hochgerner, & J. Howaldt (Eds.), Challenge social innovation: Potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society (pp. 19–42). Heidelberg: Springer.
Mulgan, G. (2012b). The theoretical foundations of social innovation. In A. Nicholls & A. Murdock (Eds.), Social innovation: Blurring boundaries to reconfigure markets (pp. 33–65). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Novak, M. (2018). Civil society as a complex adaptive phenomenon. Cosmos + Taxis, 5(3/4), 3–13.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
O’Sullivan, D., & Dooley, L. (2009). Applying innovation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Palagashvili, L., Piano, E., & Skarbek, D. (2017). The decline and rise of institutions: A modern survey of the Austrian contribution to the economic analysis of institutions. London: Cambridge University Press Elements.
Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43.
Potts, J. (2010). Innovation by elimination: A proposal for negative policy experiments in the public sector. Innovation: Organization & Management, 12(2), 238–248.
Potts, J. (2014). Innovation is a spontaneous order. Cosmos + Taxis, 2(1), 1–10.
Reinstaller, A. (2013). An evolutionary view of social innovation and the process of dynamic change. WWWforEurope working paper series no. 43. http://www.foreurope.eu/fileadmin/documents/pdf/Workingpapers/WWWforEurope_WPS_no043_MS51.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2018.
Robeyns, I. (2016). The capability approach. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/capability-approach. Accessed 30 Oct 2018.
Rosen, S. (1997). Austrian and neoclassical economics: Any gains from trade? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(4), 139–152.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
Shey, T. H. (1977). Why communes fail: A comparative analysis of the viability of Danish and American communes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 39(3), 605–613.
Snow, D. A. (2003). Social movements. In L. T. Reynolds & N. J. Herman-Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 811–833). Walnut Creek: Rowman & Littlefield.
Storr, V. H. (2013). Understanding the culture of markets. New York: Routledge.
Storr, V. H., Haeffele-Balch, S., & Grube, L. E. (2015). Community revival in the wake of disaster: Lessons in local entrepreneurship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Storr, V. H., Haeffele-Balch, S., & Grube, L. E. (2017). Social capital and social learning after hurricane Sandy. Review of Austrian Economics, 30(4), 447–467.
Sunstein, C. (1996). Social norms and social roles. Columbia Law Review, 96(4), 903–968.
Sutter, D., & Smith, D. J. (2017). Coordination in disaster: Nonprice learning and the allocation of resources after natural disasters. Review of Austrian Economics, 30(4), 469–492.
Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (2006). Contentious politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Vaughn, K. (1994). Can democratic society reform itself? The limits of constructive change. In P. J. Boettke & D. L. Prychitko (Eds.), The market process: Essays in contemporary Austrian economics (pp. 229–243). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Wagner, R. E. (2016). Politics as a peculiar business: Insights from a theory of entangled political economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Wandel, J., & Valentinov, V. (2014). The nonprofit Catallaxy: An Austrian economics perspective on the nonprofit sector. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(1), 138–149.
Yu, T. F.-L. (2011). New perspectives on economic development: A human agency approach. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532.
Ziegler, R. (2010). Innovations in doing and being: Capability innovations at the intersection of Schumpeterian political economy and human development. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 255–272.
The author wishes to thank Paul Lewis and an anonymous referee for their comments on a draft version of this paper. The usual caveats apply.
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
Availability of data and material
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Novak, M. Social innovation and Austrian economics: Exploring the gains from intellectual trade. Rev Austrian Econ 34, 129–147 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-020-00503-y
- Non-price coordination
- Social innovation