The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 41–52 | Cite as

Mises and prediction markets: Can markets forecast?

  • Leonid Krasnozhon
  • John Levendis


Ludwig von Mises’s methodological position is unique because it combines apriorism with qualitative empirical approach. Nonetheless, Mises’s adherents and detractors continue to characterize his apriorism as rejecting forecasting. This paper argues that a prediction market is a traditional market for forward-looking information; it leverages subjective knowledge and aggregates information via the market process to effectively solve the Hayekian knowledge problem. We argue that Austrian economists should embrace prediction markets as a powerful method of forecasting rooted in human action.


Ludwig von Mises Prediction markets Forecasting 

JEL Codes

B53 L30 M00 


  1. Barnett, W., II. (2003). Dimensions and Economics: Some Problems. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 6(3), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berg, J., R., Forsythe, F., Nelson and T., Rietz. (2001). Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research. in C., Plott and V., Smith (Eds) Handbook of Experimental Economic Results.Google Scholar
  3. Block, W. (1999). Austrian Theorizing: Recalling the Foundations. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 2, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Block, W. (2003). Realism: Austrian vs. Neoclassical Economics, Reply to Caplan. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 6(3), 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Block, W., & McGee, R. W. (1992). Insider Trading. In R. W. McGee (Ed.), Business Ethics and Common Sense (pp. 219–229). New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  6. Boettke, P. (Ed.). (1994). The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Boettke, P. (1998). Ludwig von Mises. In J. Davis, D. Wade Hands, & U. Maki (Eds.), The Handbook of Economic Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Boettke, P. J. (2001). Calculation and coordination. PAGE. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boettke, P. J. (2010). Handbook on Contemporary Austrian Economics. Northhampton: Edward Elger.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boettke, P., & Prychitko, D. (Eds.). (1994). The market process : Essays in contemporary Austrian economics. USA: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
  11. Caplan, B. (1999). The Austrian Search for Realistic Foundations. Southern Economic Journal, 65(4), 823–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caplan, B. (2001). Probability, Common Sense, and Realism: A Reply to Hülsmann and Block. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 4(2), 69–86.Google Scholar
  13. Caplan, B. (2003). Probability and the Synthetic A Priori: A Reply to Block. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 6(3), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crovelli, M. (2010). A Challenge to Ludwig von Mises’ Theory of Probability. Libertarian Papers, 2(23), 2–14.Google Scholar
  15. Forsythe, R., Nelson, F., Neumann, G. R., & Wright, J. (1992). Anatomy of an Experimental Political Stock Market. American Economic Review, 82, 1142–1161.Google Scholar
  16. Friedman, M. (1953). Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gelman, A., & Nolan, D. (2002). You Can Load a Die, But You Can’t Bias a Coin. The American Statistician, 56(4), 308–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanson, R. (1990). Market-based foresight: A proposal. Foresight Update, 10, 1–4.Google Scholar
  19. Hanson, R. (1991). More market-based foresight. Foresight Update, 11, 11.Google Scholar
  20. Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.Google Scholar
  21. Hoppe, H. (1997). On Certainty and Uncertainty, Or: How Rational Can Our Expectations Be? Review of Austrian Economics, 10(1), 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoppe, H. (2007). The Limits of Numerical Probability: Frank H. Knight and Ludwig Von Mises and the Frequency Interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 10(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hülsmann, J. G. (1999). Economic Science and Neoclassicism. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 2(4), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirzner, I. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60–85.Google Scholar
  25. Knight, F. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  26. Lachmann, L. (1994). Expectations and the meaning of institutions: Essays in economics. London: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  27. Langlois, R. (1994). Risk and uncertainty. In P. Boettke (Ed.), The Elgar companion to Austrian economics (pp. 118–122). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  28. Leeson, P., & Boettke, P. J. (2006). Was Mises Rights? Review of Social Economy, 2, 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lewin, P. (2001). The Development of Austrian Economics: Revisiting the Neoclassical Divide. Review of Austrian Economics, 14(4), 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewin, P. (2012). What do We Know for Certain about Uncertainty? The Legatum Institute Charles Street Symposium, June 10.Google Scholar
  31. Lucas, R. (1976). Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1.Google Scholar
  32. McGee, R., & Block, W. (2004). An Ethical and Economic Look at Insider Trading. In A. de Wolf (Ed.), Ordered Anarchy: Festschrift Essays in Honor of Anthony de Jasay. Arlington: Singularity Press.Google Scholar
  33. O’Driscoll, G., & Rizzo, M. (1996). The Economics of Time and Ignorance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Powell, B., & Stringham, E. (2012). Radical Scholarship Taking on the Mainstream: Murray Rothbard’s Contribution. Review of Austrian Economics, 25, 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roll, R. (1984). Orange juice and weather. American Economic Review, 74, 861–880.Google Scholar
  36. Rosenbloom, E. S., & Notz, W. (2006). Statistical Tests of Real-Money versus Play-Money Prediction Markets. Electronic Markets, 16(1), 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rothbard, M. ([1962]1993). Man, economy, and state: A treatise on economic principles. Auburn, AL: Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  38. Rothbard, M. (1979). Thy Myth of Efficiency. In M. Rizzo (Ed.), Time, Uncertainty, and Disequilibrium. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.Google Scholar
  39. Rothbard, M. (1991). The End of Socialism and the Calculation Debate Revisited. Review of Austrian Economics, 5(2), 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rothbard, M. (2011). Economic Controversies. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  41. Servan-Schreiber, E., Wolfers, J., Pennock, D., & Galebach, B. (2004). Prediction Markets: Does Money Matter. Electronic Markets, 14(3), 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Snowberg, E., Wolfers, J., & Zitzewitz, E. (2007). Partisan Impact on the Economy: Evidence from Prediction Markets and Close Elections. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 807–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1467–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  45. Thaler, R. (1992). The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Varian, H. (1992). Microeconomic analysis. New York: W. W Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  47. Vaughn, K. (1994). Austrian economics in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. von Mises, R. ([1928] 1957). Probability, statistics, and truth. New York: DoverGoogle Scholar
  49. von Mises, L. ([1933] 1978). Epistemological Problems of Economics, Jena: Gustav FischerGoogle Scholar
  50. von Mises, L. ([1949] 1996). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  51. von Mises, L. (1957). Theory and History. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. New York/London: Free.Google Scholar
  53. Wolfers, J., & Zitzewitz, E. (2004). Prediction Markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(2), 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Loyola University New OrleansNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations