Advertisement

The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 93–104 | Cite as

What kind of state in our future? Fact and Conjecture in Vito Tanzi’s Government versus Markets

  • Richard E. Wagner
Article
  • 142 Downloads

Abstract

This is a review essay on Vito Tanzi’s Government versus Markets: The Changing Economic Role of the State. The bulk of this book looks backward on the relative growth of government from late in the 19th century until recent times when that growth seems to have stopped in many places. Tanzi also looks forward in speculating on possible qualitative changes in the character of state activity through substitution of regulation for taxation. Much wisdom is presented in these pages, and yet the book contains some significant conceptual shortcomings and lacunae due to its apparent embrace of the possibility of measurement without theory. All the same, the book poses significant challenges for scholarship in political economy and public economics.

Keywords

Growth of government Adolf Wagner Wagner’s Law Regulation as taxation States as orders Measurement without theory 
JEL Codes H11 K20 L38 N40 P16 

References

  1. Auteri, M., & Wagner, R. E. (2007). The organizational architecture of nonprofit governance: economic calculation within an ecology of enterprises. Public Organization Review, 7, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Backhaus, J. G., & Wagner, R. E. (2005a). From continental public finance to public choice: mapping continuity. History of Political Economy, Annual Supplement, 37, 314–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backhaus, J. G., & Wagner, R. E. (2005b). “Continental public finance: mapping and recovering a tradition. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 23, 43–67.Google Scholar
  4. Benson, B. L. (1990). The enterprise of law: Justice without the state. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Boettke, P. J. (1998). Economic calculation: the Austrian contribution to political economy. Advances in Austrian Economics, 5, 131–158.Google Scholar
  6. Boettke, P. J. (2010). Is the only form of ‘reasonable regulation’ self regulation?: lessons from Lin Ostrom on regulating the commons and cultivating citizens. Public Choice, 143, 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borcherding, T. E., Ferris, J. S., & Garzoni, A. (2004). Growth in the real size of government since 1970. In J. G. Backhaus & R. E. Wagner (Eds.), Handbook of public finance (pp. 77–108). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Buchanan, J. M. (1969). Cost and choice. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
  9. Buchanan, J. M. (1982). Order defined in the process of its emergence. Liiterature of Liberty, 5, 5.Google Scholar
  10. Cheung, S. N. S. (1975). “Roofs or Stars: The Stated Intents and Actual Effects of a Rents Ordinance.” Economic Inquiry, 13, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Eusepi, G. and R. E. Wagner. (2013). “Tax Prices in a Democratic Polity: The Continuing Relevance of Antonio De Viti de Marco.” History of Political Economy, forthcoming in March.Google Scholar
  13. Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for mortals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobs, J. (1992). Systems of survival. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  15. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  16. Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kirzner, I. M. (1985). Discovery and the capitalist process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Koopmans, T. J. (1947). Measurement without theory. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 29, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mankiw, N. G. (2006). The macroeconomist as scientist and engineer. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ostrom, V. (1984). Why governments fail: An inquiry into the use of instruments of evil to do good. In J. M. Buchanan & R. D. Tollison (Eds.), Theory of public choice II (pp. 422–435). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ostrom, V. (1987). The political theory of a compound republic (2nd ed.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ostrom, V. (1996). Faustian Bargains. Constitutional Political Economy, 7, 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ostrom, V. (1997). The meaning of democracy and the vulnerability of societies: A response to Tocqueville’s challenge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  24. Pantaleoni, M. (1911). Considerazioni sulle proprieta di un sistema di prezzi politici. Giornale degli Economisti, 42(9–29), 114–133.Google Scholar
  25. Pareto, V. (1935). The Mind and Society: A Treatise on General Sociology. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  26. Raudla, R. (2010). Governing budgetary commons: what can we learn from Elinor Ostrom? European Journal of Law and Economics, 30, 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Read, L. (1958). I, Pencil. Irvington-on-Hudson: Foundation for Economic Education.Google Scholar
  28. Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, termites, and traffic jams: Explorations in massively parallel microworlds. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  30. Selgin, G. (1996). Bank deregulation and monetary order. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Streit, M. (1992). Economic order, private law, and public policy: the Freiberg school of law and economics in perspective. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 148, 675–704.Google Scholar
  32. Tanzi, V. (2011). Government versus markets: The changing economic role of the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vining, R. (1949). Koopmans on the choice of variables to be studied and the methods of measurement. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 31, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. de Viti De Marco, A. (1888). Il Carattere Teorico dell’Economia Finanziaria. Rome: Pasqualucci.Google Scholar
  35. de Viti De Marco, A. (1936). First Principles of Public Finance, translated from the Italian by Edith Pavlo Marget. New York: Harcourt Brace and Co., Inc.Google Scholar
  36. Wagner, A. (1883). Finanzwissenschaft (3rd ed.). Leipzig: C. F. Winter.Google Scholar
  37. Wagner, R. E. (2007). Fiscal sociology and the theory of public finance. Cheltanham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  38. Wagner, R. E. (2010). Mind, society, and human action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Wagner, R. E. (2012a). Deficits, debt, and democracy: Wrestling with tragedy on the fiscal commons. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  40. Wagner, R. E. (2012b). The social construction of theoretical landscapes: some economics of economic theories. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 71, 1185–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wagner, R. E. (2012c). A macro economy as an ecology of plans. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 82, 433–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wagner, R. E. (2012d). Viennese kaleidics: why it’s liberty more than policy that calms turbulence. Review of Austrian Economics, 25, 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wagner, R. E. and D. Yazigi. (2013). “Form vs. Substance in Selection through Competition: Elections, Markets, and Political Economy.” Public Choice. doi: 10.1007/s11127-013-0065-y.
  44. White, L. H. (1999). The theory of monetary institutions. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  45. White, L. H. (2012). The clash of economic ideas: The great policy debates and experiments of the last hundred years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wicksell, K. (1958[1896]). A New principle of just taxation. In R. A. Musgrave & A. T. Peacock (Eds.), Classics in the theory of public finance (pp. 72–118). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. Young, R. A. (1991). Tectonic policies and political competition. In A. Breton et al. (Eds.), The competitive state (pp. 129–145). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ziliak, S. T., & McCloskey, D. N. (2008). The cult of statistical significance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, 3G4George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations