Embedded markets: A dialogue between F.A. Hayek and Karl Polanyi

  • Andrea Migone


The recent economic crisis has once more underscored the close connection between markets and social life, thrusting this point at the centre of the analysis of economic and political activity and has once more asked the question of whether and how individuals are embedded in both. Here I argue that an analysis and partial reconciliation of the positions of F.A. Hayek and Karl Polanyi on the topic can help in this debate.


Hayek Polanyi Embeddedness Markets 

JEL codes

B25 B52 


  1. Accarino, B. (1982). La democrazia insicura: Etica e politica in Georg Simmel, la storia e le idee. Napoli: Guida.Google Scholar
  2. Adaman, F., Devine, P., & Ozkaynak, B. (2003). Reinstituting the economic process: (Re)embedding the economy in society and nature. International Review of Sociology—Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 13(2), 357–374.Google Scholar
  3. Albrow, M. (1990). Max Weber’s construction of social theory. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  4. Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barber, B. (1977). Absolutization of the market: some notes on how we got from there to here. In P. Brown (Ed.), Markets and morals (pp. 15–31). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  6. Barber, B. (1995). All economies are “embedded”: the career of a concept and beyond. Social Research, 62(2), 387–413.Google Scholar
  7. Beckert, J. (2009). The social order of markets. Theory and Society, 38(3), 245–269.Google Scholar
  8. Bernard, M. (1997). Political economy and the counter movement: Karl Polanyi and the second great transformation. In D. Salée (Ed.), The legacy of Karl Polanyi: Market, state and society at the end of the twentieth century (pp. 75–89). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Bhaskar, R. (1989). The possibility of naturalism. A philosophic critique of the contemporary human sciences (2nd ed.). Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
  10. Bienefeld, M. (1991). Karl Polanyi and the contradictions of the 1980s. In D. Salée (Ed.), The legacy of Karl Polanyi: Market, state and society at the end of the twentieth century (pp. 3–5). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Birchfield, V. (1999). Contesting the hegemony of market ideology: Gramsci’s ‘good sense’ and Polanyi’s ‘double movement’. Review of International Political Economy, 6(1), 27–54.Google Scholar
  12. Block, F. (2001). Introduction. In F. Block (Ed.), The great transformation (pp. xvii–xxxix). New York: Beacon.Google Scholar
  13. Block, F., & Sommers, M. (1984). Beyond the economistic fallacy: The holistic social science of Karl Polanyi. In T. Skocpol (Ed.), Vision and method in historical sociology (pp. 47–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Boettke, P. J. (1989). Evolution and economics: Austrians as institutionalists. Researches in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 6, 73–90.Google Scholar
  15. Boettke, P. J. (2002). Information and knowledge: Austrian Economics in search of its uniqueness. The Review of Austrian Economics, 15(4), 263–274.Google Scholar
  16. Boettke, P. J., & Storr, V. H. (2002). Post-classical political economy: Polity, society and economy in Weber, Mises and Hayek. American Journal of Economics and Society, 61(1), 161–191.Google Scholar
  17. Böhm, S. (1994). Hayek and knowledge: Some question marks. In M. Colonna, H. Hagemann, & O. F. Hamouda (Eds.), Capitalism, socialism and knowledge (pp. 160–178). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. Butos, W. N. (2003). Knowledge questions: Hayek, Keynes and beyond. The Review of Austrian Economics, 16(4), 291–307.Google Scholar
  19. Cangiani, M. (2003). The forgotten institution. International Review of Sociology—Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 13(2), 327–341.Google Scholar
  20. Dale, G. (2010). Karl Polanyi: The limits of the market. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  21. Fehl, U. (1994). Spontaneous order. In P. J. Boettke (Ed.), The Elgar companion to Austrian economics (pp. 197–205). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  22. Ferguson, A. (1767). An essay on the history of civil society. Vol. 3. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fleetwood, S. (2008). Structure, institution, agency, habit, and reflexive deliberation. Journal of Institutional Economics, 4(2), 183–203.Google Scholar
  24. Fleetwood, S. (2010). Sketching a socio-economic model of labour markets. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35, 15–38.Google Scholar
  25. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  26. Fouilée, A. (1930). Le socialisme et la sociologie réformiste (4th ed.). Paris: Librarie Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
  27. Galeotti, A. E. (1987). Individualism, social rules, tradition: The case of Friedrich A. Hayek. Political Theory, 15(2), 163–181.Google Scholar
  28. Gemici, K. (2008). Karl Polanyi and the antinomies of embeddedness. Socio-Economic Review, 6(1), 5–33.Google Scholar
  29. Giddens, A. (1982). Profiles and critiques in social theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  31. Gloria-Palermo, S. (1999). The evolution of Austrian economics. From Menger to Lachmann. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Goldfrank, W. (1990). Fascism and the great transformation. In K. Polanyi-Levitt (Ed.), The life and work of Karl Polanyi: A celebration (pp. 87–92). Montréal: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
  33. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 91, 481–510.Google Scholar
  34. Granovetter, M. (1992). Economic institutions as social constructions: A framework for analysis. Acta Sociologica, 35, 3–11.Google Scholar
  35. Granovetter, M., & Swedberg, R. (1992). The sociology of economic life. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  36. Gray, J. (1986). Hayek on liberty (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. Gray, J. (1998). False dawn: The delusions of global capitalism. New York: New.Google Scholar
  38. Hayek, F. A. (1946). Individualism: True and false. Dublin: Hodges, Figgis, and Co.Google Scholar
  39. Hayek, F. A. (1948a). Individualism and economic order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Hayek, F. A. (1948b). Individualism: True and false. In F. A. Hayek (Ed.), Individualism and economic order (pp. 1–32). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Hayek, F. A. (1948c). The meaning of competition. In F. A. Hayek (Ed.), Individualism and economic order (pp. 92–106). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hayek, F. A. (Ed.). (1954). Capitalism and the historians: Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Hayek, F. A. (1960). The constitution of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Hayek, F. A. (1964a). Kinds of order in society. New Individualist Review, 3, 3–12.Google Scholar
  45. Hayek, F. A. (1964b). The theory of complex phenomena. In M. A. Bunge (Ed.), The critical approach to science and philosophy: Essays in honor of K.R. Popper (pp. 332–349). New York: Free.Google Scholar
  46. Hayek, F. A. (1967). Rules, perception and intelligibility. In F. A. Hayek (Ed.), Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  47. Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty: Rules and order. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Hayek, F. A. (1976). Law, legislation and liberty: The mirage of social justice. Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hayek, F. A. (1978a). Competition as a discovery procedure. In F. A. Hayek (Ed.), New studies in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas (pp. 179–190). London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
  50. Hayek, F. A. (1978b). The confusion of language in political thought. In F. A. Hayek (Ed.), New studies in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas (pp. 71–97). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Hayek, F. A. (1978c). New studies in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Hayek, F. A. (1979). Law, legislation and liberty: The political order of a free people. Vol. 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  53. Hayek, F. A. (1988). The fatal conceit: The errors of socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  54. Hayek, F. A. (1994). Hayek on Hayek: An autobiographical dialogue. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Heath, E. (1989). How to understand liberalism as gardening: Galeotti on Hayek. Political Theory, 17(1), 107–113.Google Scholar
  56. Heath, E. (1992). Rules, function, and the invisible hand an interpretation of Hayek’s social theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 22(1), 28–45.Google Scholar
  57. Hechter, M. (1981). Karl Polanyi’s social theory. Politics and Society, 10(4), 399–429.Google Scholar
  58. Helleiner, E. (1995). Great transformations: A Polanyian perspective on the contemporary financial order. Studies in Political Economy, 48, 149–164.Google Scholar
  59. Helleiner, E. (2003). Economic liberalism and its critics: The past as prologue? Review of International Political Economy, 10(4), 685–696.Google Scholar
  60. Hodgson, G. M. (2003). The hidden persuaders: Institutions and individuals in economic theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2), 159–175.Google Scholar
  61. Hodgson, G. M. (2004). The evolution of institutional economics. Agency, structure and Darwinism in American institutionalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Hodgson, G. M. (2007a). Meanings of methodological individualism. Journal of Economic Methodology, 14(2), 211–226.Google Scholar
  63. Hodgson, G. M. (2007b). Institutions and individuals: Interaction and evolution. Organization, 28(1), 95–116.Google Scholar
  64. Hoover, K. R. (2003). Economics as ideology: Keynes, Laski, Hayek, and the creation of contemporary politics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  65. Ioannides, S. (2003). Orders and organizations: Hayekian insights for a theory of economic organization. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 62(3), 533–566.Google Scholar
  66. Jessop, B. (2001). The social embeddedness of the economy and its implications for economic governance. In P. Devine (Ed.), The socially embedded economy. Montreal: Black Books.Google Scholar
  67. Kelsey, J. (2000). Polanyi revisited: Globalisation and its contradictions in the new millennium. In M. Richardson (Ed.), Globalisation and international trade liberalisation: Continuity and change (pp. 170–183). London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  68. Kirshner, J. (1999). Keynes, capital mobility and the crisis of embedded liberalism. Review of International Political Economy, 6(3), 313–337.Google Scholar
  69. Kloppenberg, J. T. (1986). Uncertain victory: Social democracy and progressivism in European and American thought, 1870–1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Koppl, R. G. (1992). Invisible-hand explanations and neoclassical economics: Towards a post marginalist economics. Journal of Institutional And Theoretical Economics, 148(2), 292–313.Google Scholar
  71. Koppl, R. G. 1994. ‘Invisible hand’ explanations. In P. J. Boettke (Ed.), The Elgar companion to Austrian Economics (pp. 193–196). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  72. Krippner, G. R. (2001). The elusive market: Embeddedness and the paradigm of economic sociology. Theory and Society, 30(7), 775–810.Google Scholar
  73. Lacher, H. (1999a). Embedded liberalism, disembedded markets: reconceptualizing the Pax Americana. New Political Economy, 4(3), 343–360.Google Scholar
  74. Lacher, H. (1999b). The politics of the market: Re-reading Karl Polanyi. Global Society, 13(3), 313–326.Google Scholar
  75. Lachmann, L. M. (1982). Ludwig von Mises and the extension of subjectivism. In I. Krizonor (Ed.), Method, process, and Austrian economics: Essays in honor of Ludwig Von Mises (pp. 31–40). Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  76. Lachmann, L. M. (1990). G.L.S. Shackle’s place in the history of subjectivist thought. In S. F. Frowen (Ed.), Unknowledge and choice in economics: Proceedings of a conference in honour of G. L. S. Shackle. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  77. Langlois, R. N. (1986). Economics as a process: Essays in the New Institutional Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Lavoie, D. (1995). The market as a procedure for the discovery and conveyance of inarticulate knowledge. In D. L. Prychitko (Ed.), Individuals, institutions, interpretations. Hermeneutics applied to economics (pp. 115–137). Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  79. Lewis, P. A. (2005). Structure, agency and causality in post-revival Austrian Economics: tensions and resolutions. Review of Political Economy, 17(2), 291–316.Google Scholar
  80. McCann, C. R. (2002). F. A. Hayek: The liberal as communitarian. The Review of Austrian Economics, 15(1), 5–34.Google Scholar
  81. McCloskey, D. N. (2006). The Bourgeois virtues: Ethics for an age of commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  82. McCloskey, D. N. (2010). Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  83. Meadowcroft, J., & Pennington, M. (2008). Bonding and bridging: Social capital and the communitarian critique of liberal markets. Review of Austrian Economics, 21(2–3), 119–133.Google Scholar
  84. Menger, C. (1985 [1883]). Investigations into the method of the social sciences with special reference to economics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Mikl-Horke, G. (2008). Austrian economics and economic sociology: past relations and future possibilities for a socio-economic perspective. Socio-Economic Review, 6(2), 201–226.Google Scholar
  86. Munck, R. (2004). Globalization, labor and the ‘Polanyi problem’. Labor History, 45(3), 251–269.Google Scholar
  87. O’Rourke, K. H., & Williamson, J. G. (1999). Globalization and history. The evolution of a nineteenth century Atlantic economy. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  88. Palmer, T. G. (2009). Realizing freedom. Libertarian theory, history, and practice. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
  89. Plociniczak, S. (2002). Action économique et relations sociales: La notion d’encastrement chez Karl Polanyi et Mark Granovetter. Paris: Université Paris 13.Google Scholar
  90. Polanyi, K. (1945). Universal capitalism or regional planning? London Quarterly of World Affairs, 1, 1–6.Google Scholar
  91. Polanyi, K. (1947). Our obsolete market mentality. Commentary, 3, 109–117.Google Scholar
  92. Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  93. Polanyi, K. (1977). The livelihood of man. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  94. Raleen, S. (1998). Classical liberalism and international economic order. Studies in theory and intellectual order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  95. Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415.Google Scholar
  96. Sandel, M. (1998). Liberalism and the limits of justice (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Scott, A. (1996). Bureaucratic revolutions and free market utopias. Economy and Society, 25(1), 89–110.Google Scholar
  98. Shearmur, J. Y. (1996). Hayek and after: Hayekian liberalism as a research programme. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  99. Simmel, G. (1900). Philosophie des Geldes. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  100. Simmel, G. (1903). Über räumliche Projektionen sozialer Formen. Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaften, 6, 287–302.Google Scholar
  101. Simmel, G. (1908). Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  102. Simmel, G. (1950 [1903]). The metropolis and mental life. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  103. Simmel, G. (1978). The philosophy of money. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  104. Simmel, G. (1991 [1908]). The problem of style. Theory, Culture and Society, 8, 63–71.Google Scholar
  105. Slater, D., & Tonkiss, F. (2001). Market society. Markets and modern social theory. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  106. Storr, V. (2008). The market as a social space. On the meaningful extra-economic conversations that can occur in markets. Review of Austrian Economics, 21(2–3), 135–150.Google Scholar
  107. Trigilia, C. (2002). Economic sociology. State, market, and society in modern capitalism. Oxford: Blackweel.Google Scholar
  108. Udehn, L. (2002). The changing face of methodological individualism. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 479–507.Google Scholar
  109. Ullmann-Margalit, E. (1978). Invisible hand explanations. Synthèse, 39(2), 263–291.Google Scholar
  110. Vanberg, V. (1986). Spontaneous market order and social rules: A critical examination of F.A. Hayek theory of cultural evolution. Economic Philosophy, 2(1), 75–100.Google Scholar
  111. Vaughn, K. I. (1994). Austrian economics In America: The migration of a tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  112. Von Mises, L. (1966). Human action: A treatise on economics (3rd ed.). Chicago: Contemporary Books.Google Scholar
  113. Weber, M. (1978 [1922]). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  114. Weber, M. (1981). General economic history. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  115. Weber, M. (2002 [1930]). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism and other writings. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  116. Whitman, D. G. (1998). Hayek contra Pangloss on evolutionary systems. Constitutional Political Economy, 9, 45–66.Google Scholar
  117. Zafirovski, M. (2002). Paths of the Weberian-Austrian connection. The Review Of Austrian Economics, 15(1), 35–59.Google Scholar
  118. Zwirn, G. (2007). Methodological individualism or methodological atomism: The case of Friedrich Hayek. History of Political Economy, 39(1), 47–80.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations