Advertisement

The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 199–207 | Cite as

The curious destiny of a heterodoxy: The Austrian economic tradition

  • Thierry Aimar
Article
  • 93 Downloads

Abstract

The Austrian School has had a curious destiny: while contributing many concepts to contemporary economic theory, it is either ignored or criticised by much of modern economic literature. This article discusses possible reasons for this institutional sidelining and the main futures of a renewal of Austrian thought.

Keywords

Austrian school Market for economists 

JEL

A11 A14 B25 

References

  1. Aimar, T. (2005). Les apports de l’école autrichienne d’économie, Subjectivisme, ignorance et coordination. Paris: Vuibert.Google Scholar
  2. Aimar, T. (2008a). Self-Ignorance: Toward an extension of Austrian paradigm. The Review of Austrian Economics, 21(1), 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aimar, T. (2008b). Economie et psychologie, une réflexion autrichienne sur l’organisation de l’esprit. Revue Française d’Economie, XXII, 189–222.Google Scholar
  4. Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C. J., Leeson, P. T., & Sautet, F. (2005). The new comparative political economy. The Review of Austrian Economics, 18(3/4), 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boudreaux, D. (1994). Schumpeter and Kirzner on competition and equilibrium. In P. J. Boettke, & D. L. Prychitko (Eds.), The market process, essays in contemporary Austrian economics (pp. 52–61). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Choi, Y. B. (1995). The entrepreneur: Schumpeter versus Kirzner. In P. J. Boetkke, & M. Rizzo (Eds.), Advances in Austrian economics, vol. 2, Part A (pp. 55–66). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  7. Colander, D., Holt, R., & Rosser, B. (2004). The changing face of economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  8. Desrochers, P. (1998). Geographical proximity and the transmission of tacit knowledge. The Review of Austrian Economics, 14(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Desrochers, P. (2001). A geographical perspective on Austrian economics. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1(2), 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayek, F. A. (1952). The sensory order, an inquiry into the foundations of theoretical psychology. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
  11. Hayek, F. A. (1967). Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hayek, F. A. (1980). Joseph Schumpeter. In P. Klein (Ed.), The collected works of F.A. Hayek, the fortunes of liberalism, vol. 4 (1992) (pp. 160–165). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hébert, R., & Link, A. N. (1982). The entrepreneur, mainstream views and radical critiques. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  14. Holcombe, R. G. (2004). The new urbanism versus the market process. The Review of Austrian Economics, 17(2/3), 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ikeda, S. (2004). Urban interventionism and local knowledge. The Review of Austrian Economics, 17(2/3), 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ikeda, S. (2007). Urbanizing economics. The Review of Austrian Economics, 20(4), 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dulbecco, P., & Garrouste, P. (1999). Structure de la production et structure de la connaissance: éléments pour une théorie autrichienne de la firme. Revue Economique, 51(1), 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foss, N. (1997). Austrian insights and the theory of the firm. In: Advances in Austrian Economics, 4, 175–198.Google Scholar
  19. Ioannides, S. (1999). Towards an Austrian perspective on the firm. The Review of Austrian Economics, 11(1/2), 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirzner, I. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process. Journal of Economic Literature, XXXV, 60–85.Google Scholar
  21. Koppl, R. (2006). Austrian economics at the cutting edge. The Review of Austrian Economics, 19(4), 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leeson, P. (2007) 10 Austrian vices and how to avoid them, http://austrianeconomists.typepad.com/webblog/2007/03:austrian_vices_.htlm.
  23. Mises, L. V. (1933). Epistemological problems of economics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Mises, L. V. (1957). Theory and history. Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Mises, L. V. (1962). The ultimate foundation of economic science. Kansas City: Sheed, Andrews and MacMeel.Google Scholar
  26. Mises, L. V. (1966). Human action: A treatise on economics. Chicago: Henry Regnery.Google Scholar
  27. Mises, L. V. (1978). Notes and recollections. South Holland: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rothbard, M. (1963). America’s great depression. New York City: Richardson et Snyder.Google Scholar
  29. Sautet, F. (2000). An entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Londres: Routledge and Kegan.Google Scholar
  30. Stigler, G. (1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 69, 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Witt, U. (1999). Do entrepreneurs need firms? A contribution to a missing chapter in Austrian economics. The Review of Austrian Economics, 11(1/2), 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yu, T. F. (2001). Entrepreneurial alertness and discovery. The Review of Austrian Economics, 14(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Law and EconomicsUniversity of Nancy 2NancyFrance

Personalised recommendations