Abstract
What does socialism after Hayek look like? Ted Burczak provides one highly intriguing answer.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boettke, P. (1998). Rethinking ourselves: negotiating values in the political economy of postcommunism. Rethinking Marxism, 10(2), 85–95.
Boettke, P. (2001). Calculation and Coordination. London: Routledge.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1993). The revenge of Homo economicus: Contested exchange and the revival of political economy. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(1), 83–102.
Bowles, S. (2004). Microeconomics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Burczak, T. A. (2006). Socialism after Hayek. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ellerman, D. (1992). Property and contract in economics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lavoie, D. (1985). National economic planning. Pensacola: Ballinger Publishing Company.
Resnick, S., & Wolff, R. (1987). Knowledge and class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Storr, V. H. (2007). Review of Theodore A. Burczak’s Socialism after Hayek. Review of Austrian Economics, 20, 313–316.
Wolff, R. (2007). Why communism. Rethinking Marxism, 19.3, 322–336.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
With contributions by: Andrew Farrant, Sandra J. Peart and David M. Levy, J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. and Marina V. Rosser, Edward McPhail, and Theodore Burczak
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Farrant, A. A symposium on Theodore Burczak’s, Socialism after Hayek . Rev Austrian Econ 22, 281–284 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-008-0063-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-008-0063-3