The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 281–284 | Cite as

A symposium on Theodore Burczak’s, Socialism after Hayek



What does socialism after Hayek look like? Ted Burczak provides one highly intriguing answer.


Theodore Burczak Hayekian socialism Classical socialism Marxism Amherst school 

JEL codes

B0 B25 P26 


  1. Boettke, P. (1998). Rethinking ourselves: negotiating values in the political economy of postcommunism. Rethinking Marxism, 10(2), 85–95.Google Scholar
  2. Boettke, P. (2001). Calculation and Coordination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1993). The revenge of Homo economicus: Contested exchange and the revival of political economy. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(1), 83–102.Google Scholar
  4. Bowles, S. (2004). Microeconomics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Burczak, T. A. (2006). Socialism after Hayek. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ellerman, D. (1992). Property and contract in economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Lavoie, D. (1985). National economic planning. Pensacola: Ballinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  8. Resnick, S., & Wolff, R. (1987). Knowledge and class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Storr, V. H. (2007). Review of Theodore A. Burczak’s Socialism after Hayek. Review of Austrian Economics, 20, 313–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wolff, R. (2007). Why communism. Rethinking Marxism, 19.3, 322–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsDickinson CollegeCarlisleUSA

Personalised recommendations