, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 345–351 | Cite as

A Spectrophotometric Study of the Interaction of Uranyl Ions with Orthosilicic Acid and Polymeric Silicic Acids in Aqueous Solutions

  • A. B. Yusov
  • A. M. Fedoseev


The interaction of UO 2 2+ ions with orthosilicic acid Si(OH)4 and polymeric silicic acids (PSAs) was studied spectrophotometrically. The equilibrium constant of the reaction UO 2 2+ + Si(OH)4 = UO2OSi(OH) 3 + + H+ in solutions with the ionic strength I = 0.1–0.2 is log K = −2.56±0.09 (log K0 = −2.29±0.09 recalculated to I = 0); the stability constant of the complex UO2OSi(OH) 3 + (I = 0) is log β0 = 7.52±0.09. Formation of small oligomers (degree of polymerization n ≤ 4) has virtually no effect on the apparent constant K. When high polymers are formed (n > 100), the apparent equilibrium constant decreases by a factor of 2–3, and the “true” equilibrium constant recalculated to the actual concentration of silanol groups increases by a factor of 3–4. The absorption spectrum of the complex UO2OSi(OH) 3 + was obtained by treatment of the experimental spectra; it has an absorption maximum in the visible range at 422.5 nm, ɛ422.5 = 35±2 l mol−1 cm− 1. At pH higher than 5–6, complexes of UO 2 2+ with PSAs of the composition UO2(≡SiO)2(≡ SiOH)m − 2 are formed. The absorption spectrum of such a complex was obtained.


Absorption Spectrum Oligomer Uranyl Equilibrium Constant Actual Concentration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Porter, R.A. and Weber, W.J., Jr., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 1971, vol. 33, no.8, p. 2443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Satoh, I. and Choppin, G.R., Radiochim. Acta, 1992, vol. 56, no.1, p. 85.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jensen, M.P. and Choppin, G.R., Radiochim. Acta, 1998, vol. 82, p. 83.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jensen, M.P., Competetive Complexation Studies of Europium(III) and Uranium(VI) Complexation by Aqueous Orthosilicic Acid, PhD Thesis, Florida State Univ., 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moll, H., Geipel, G., Brendler, V., et al., J. Alloys Comp., 1998, vols. 271–273, p. 765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hrnecek, E. and Irlweck, K., Radiochim. Acta, 1999, vol. 87, no.1, p. 29.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yusov, A.B. and Fedoseev, A.M., Radiokhimiya, 2004, vol. 46, no.2, pp. 104–109.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yusov, A.B., Fedosseev, A.M., and Delegard, C., Abstracts of Papers, 9th Int. Conf. on Chemistry and Migration Behavior of Actinides and Fission Products in the Geosphere (Migration’03), gyeongju (Korea), September 21–26, 2003, PA3-18, p. 69.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guillaumont, R., Fanghanel, T., Fuger, J., et al., Update on the Chemical Thermodynamics of Uranium, Neptunium, Plutonium, Americium and Technetium, vol. 5 of OECD, NEA-TDB: Chemical Thermodynamics, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yusov, A.B. and Fedoseev, A.M., Koord. Khim., 2003, vol. 29, no.8, pp. 625–634.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yusov, A.B., Shilov, V.P., Fedoseev, A.M., et al., Radiokhimiya, 2005, vol. 47, no.4, pp. 322–327.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iler, R.K., The Chemistry of Silica, New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1979.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meinrath, G. and Schweinberger, M., Radiochim. Acta, 1996, vol. 75, no.4, pp. 205–210.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yusov, A.B., Budantseva, N.A. Fedoseev, A.M., and Astafurova, L.N., Kooord. Khim., 2001, vol. 27, no.11, pp. 824–830.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. B. Yusov
    • 1
  • A. M. Fedoseev
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Physical ChemistryRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations